Loading…
Loading…
BIS published this final rule effective immediately on October 5, 2021 (86 FR 54814, Docket BIS-2020-0024), implementing the US side of an Australia Group multilateral commitment reached at the AG Virtual Implementation Meeting of May 2021 and adopted through the AG silence procedure (no objecting member within the set window, binding on all 42 AG participating countries plus the EU).
New ECCN 2D352 (created by this rule)
ECCN 2D352 controls "software" that is: 1. Designed for nucleic acid assemblers and synthesizers described in ECCN 2B352.j (the existing AG Common Control List entry for DNA/RNA synthesizers and automated assembly equipment), AND 2. Capable of designing and building functional genetic elements from digital sequence data.
In practical terms: any software that accepts a digital DNA/RNA sequence as input and drives a physical nucleic acid synthesizer to produce the corresponding biological construct is 2D352-controlled. Prior to this rule, ECCN 2B352 captured only the physical hardware; the paired software had no CCL classification.
ECCN 2E001 amendment
The rule adds an explicit cross-reference to 2D352 in ECCN 2E001, which controls technology for the "development" of listed software. This captures foundational research and engineering know-how used to build or improve 2D352-controlled software, subject to CB Column 2 and AT Column 1 licence requirements.
Licence requirements
| Reason | Column | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| CB (Chemical/Biological Weapons) | CB Column 2 | Licence required for exports to most non-allied destinations, including China, Russia, Iran, and most of the Global South. Licences face a presumption of denial for weapons-related end users. |
| AT (Anti-Terrorism) | AT Column 1 | Licence required for state sponsors of terrorism. |
No licence exceptions were created or extended for 2D352 in this rule.
Multilateral framing
Because controls are AG-multilateral rather than US-unilateral, all 42 AG member states are expected to adopt equivalent controls. BIS cited this harmonisation as a "level playing field" justification — US exporters face the same controls as their foreign competitors in Australia, Canada, EU member states, Japan, South Korea, and the UK.