Loading…
Loading…
The rule translates December 2022 Wassenaar Arrangement plenary decisions into U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) amendments across five ECCNs in Category 9 (Aerospace and Propulsion) of the Commerce Control List (CCL):
ECCN 9A001 / 9A003 revisions:
subsonic gas turbine engines to migrate from 9A001 to EAR99-adjacent 9A991 — to supersonic engines. Previously, a supersonic engine that obtained civil type certification could still remain in 9A001; after this rule it receives the same decontrol pathway as subsonic, provided it is certified by type with a civil-certified supersonic aircraft.
ECCN 9E001 / 9E003.k (new paragraph) — key structural change:
engines enabling sustained supersonic cruise (Mach ≥ 1 for > 30 minutes) is moved from the broad 9E001 "development" bucket to a new, narrowly scoped ECCN 9E003.k.
attaches to engine capability (not certification status). Development-phase supersonic technology therefore remains controlled indefinitely.
propulsion technologies (e.g., turbine blade coatings, blade-tip clearance controls) that are kept under export control regardless of civil use.
Strategic Trade Authorization (STA) comment request:
eligibility under License Exception STA for Country Group A:5 destinations (close U.S. allies: Australia, Japan, UK, Germany, France, South Korea, etc.).
dual-use items. Restricting 9E003.k under STA would require even allied defence-industrial partners to obtain individual licences for supersonic turbine development technology. Comments closed December 4, 2023.
This is a routine multilateral implementation — not a unilateral U.S. escalation. The Wassenaar Arrangement's 42 participating states reached the underlying decisions collectively at the December 2022 Plenary. The structural change (9E001 → 9E003.k) is a clarification that prevents accidental decontrol via civil certification, not a new restriction on previously uncovered technology. The civil cert extension to supersonic engines is a mild liberalisation. The STA comment request is a prospective inquiry, not an immediate restriction. Severity would rise to 3–4 if BIS finalises STA restriction on 9E003.k for A:5 partners (file that as an amendment or separate action if finalised).
and their supply chains handling supersonic development programmes (Boom Supersonic XB-1/Overture, Aerion AS2, any supersonic business jet) must classify new projects under 9E003.k rather than 9E001 — the control scope is unchanged but the ECCN reference in licence applications and technology-control plans changes.
9A991 treatment, reducing recurring compliance friction for commercial export.
programmes (UK, Japan, France) would face per-shipment licence requirements for supersonic turbine development technology — relevant for programmes like GCAP (Japan-UK-Italy next-gen fighter, which includes engine co-development).
restriction for 9E003.k? File an amendment if a final rule was published.
development technology controlled under 9E003.k will be relevant to allied advanced-capability programmes; monitor for allied-nation control list updates mirroring this change.