Loading…
Loading…
The Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access is the top-level regulatory instrument under the 2020 Foreign Investment Law that defines, exhaustively, the sectors in which foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs) face equity caps, JV requirements, or outright prohibition. Sectors not on the list are open to foreign investors on the same terms as domestic capital — replacing the case-by-case approval regime that operated under the pre-2020 Foreign Investment Catalogue.
The 2024 Edition (Order No. 23, signed 6 September 2024 by NDRC Chair Zheng Shanjie and MOFCOM Minister Wang Wentao, effective 1 November 2024) does three things:
1. Closes out manufacturing-sector liberalisation. The two remaining manufacturing restrictions are deleted: (i) the rule that publication-printing JVs must be Chinese-controlled, and (ii) the prohibition on foreign investment in traditional-Chinese-medicine decoction-piece processing techniques (steaming, frying, roasting, calcination) and in confidential-formula proprietary-Chinese-medicine production. With these two cuts the manufacturing sector is fully open to foreign capital on a national-treatment basis — the headline political signal of the document.
2. Reduces nationwide restrictions from 31 to 29 entries. Prohibited categories remain at roughly 21 (news publishing, postal monopoly, fishing in territorial waters, gene diagnosis/therapy, tobacco wholesale, etc.) and restricted (cap or JV-required) categories sit at the residual count. Services-sector restrictions (telecom value-added, healthcare, education, finance) are largely unchanged at the headline list level — opening here continues through pilot programmes (e.g. wholly-foreign-owned hospitals in select FTZs) rather than negative-list amendment.
3. Repeals the 2021 Edition (NDRC + MOFCOM Order No. 47 of 2021) effective the same date, completing the periodic-update cycle (2017 → 2018 → 2019 → 2020 → 2021 → 2024).
The 2024 list is paired with a separate but related 2025 Catalogue of Encouraged Industries for Foreign Investment (effective February 2026, not covered by this filing) which expands incentivised foreign-investment sectors in advanced manufacturing, services, and central/western regions — the carrot side of the architecture, where the negative list is the perimeter.
Severity 3. This is the first IPTM filing covering China's FDI market-access architecture itself, as distinct from China's outbound export-control posture (the minerals counter-strike theme) or its industrial-finance posture (Big Fund III). The 2024 edition is meaningful:
restrictions is the culmination of a five-year liberalisation arc and the most-cited data point in PRC official communications on opening-up since 2024Q3.
step than the 2018 → 2020 → 2021 cycle; the heaviest lifting (the move from 117 to 33 entries, etc.) happened in earlier editions. The two manufacturing items removed in 2024 were already low-utilisation in inbound-FDI flow data.
telecom (49%), commercial banking (no cap but Chinese-led JV in some sub-sectors), and the full prohibition on news publishing remain. The architecture that matters for digital-platform / financial-services FDI is unchanged at the negative-list level.
Severity is therefore set at 3 (politically significant signal, modest marginal liberalisation, no change to the structurally restrictive services perimeter). It does not warrant 4 because nothing in this edition changes the calculus of the structurally constrained sub-sectors that drive the FDI restriction-index in the OECD FDI-RR data.
"Stabilizing Foreign Investment" agenda, alongside the State Council's February 2025 Action Plan. Inbound FDI flow data in 2024-25 nonetheless ran weak; the bottleneck is geopolitical risk premium and IP-leakage concern, not the negative-list perimeter itself.
hospitals, telecom value-added, education) continues to happen in FTZ pilot lists rather than in the nationwide negative list. Expect future IPTM filings on FTZ-specific opening programmes if those scale beyond pilot.
alongside the parallel tightening of China's outbound-data, dual-use export-control, and AFSL regimes. The market-access perimeter for inbound capital has shrunk while the data-out / IP-out / commodity-out perimeter has hardened — a net neutral-to-tighter position for foreign multinationals operating substantively in China.
in the 2025 or 2026 edition, or continue to be handled exclusively via FTZ pilot lists?
the 2024 Negative List in advanced-manufacturing sub-sectors (semiconductors, EV, advanced battery), and does the encouragement track create de-facto preferential treatment that inverts the historic "negative list" logic?
full removal of restrictions, or does the persistent geopolitical-risk premium dominate the regulatory signal?