Loading…
Loading…
The decree is a dual-instrument escalation: a tariff layer (TIGIE modification) plus a customs-regime layer (IMMEX modification).
Tariff layer. The MFN duty on 138 finished-apparel tariff lines in Chapters 61 (knitted), 62 (non-knitted), 63 (made-up textile articles — blankets, towels, bed linen) and item 9404.40.01 is raised to 35%; 17 input-fabric lines in Chapters 52 (cotton), 55 (man-made staple), 58 (special woven), 60 (knitted/crocheted fabric) move to 15%. These rates are bound below Mexico's WTO ceiling for the affected lines, so the measure is WTO-consistent without a safeguard investigation; that's also why the FTA carve-out is automatic (FTA partners receive the preferential rate, only non-FTA suppliers face the 35% / 15%).
IMMEX layer. 302 tariff fractions in Chapters 61/62/63 are stripped from Annex II Section C (the list of items that may be temporarily imported duty-free under an IMMEX programme). This closes the "transshipment via maquiladora" channel that the Sheinbaum government publicly identified as the primary loophole — Asian-origin finished apparel was being imported into IMMEX bonded warehouses, lightly processed, and re-exported to the US under the IMMEX export commitment or sold domestically via the IMMEX 10%-domestic-sales window. After 19 Dec 2024 those flows must clear customs at the full 35% MFN rate.
Targeting. The decree is jurisdiction-neutral on its face but operationally targets China specifically: ~70%+ of Mexico's non-FTA apparel imports originate from China, with smaller volumes from Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia and Cambodia. Western fast-fashion e-commerce platforms (Shein, Temu) that ship China-origin goods to Mexican consumers are the consumer-side target.
signals willingness to use TIGIE+IMMEX modifications as a defensive trade tool ahead of the USMCA review (scheduled 2026)
Mexico wants to retain its USMCA tariff preference vis-à-vis Asia, not become a transshipment platform that triggers US §232 / IEEPA retaliation
— likely tracks the next USMCA review, suggesting the regime may be extended or made permanent depending on US side conversations
domestic textile industry (Cámara Nacional de la Industria Textil has lobbied for this since 2022)
faith signal to Washington) or contest the IMMEX changes that affect US-owned IMMEX operators?
ceramics, footwear (sectors with similar Chinese-import concerns)?