Loading…
Loading…
Last amendment: Correcting amendment — fixes inadvertent errors in dates and regulatory language in the 19 Dec 2024 final rule; substantive scope unchanged. Published as FR Doc. 2025-05482, RIN 0625-AB26, Docket 250325-0052, pages 14200-14205. on 2025-03-31.
The annexes to 19 CFR Part 351 are the operational layer of US AD/CVD law: they define the forms, certifications, service lists, and procedural templates that respondents, petitioners, and counsel must use to participate in trade-remedy investigations and administrative reviews before Commerce's Enforcement and Compliance unit. They sit underneath the substantive standards in the body of Part 351 and the broader Tariff Act of 1930.
The 19 December 2024 final rule revises those annexes to:
for the electronic ACCESS docket system that has been the mandatory filing channel for over a decade;
rulemakings Commerce finalised earlier in 2024 (notably the March 2024 "Regulations Improving and Strengthening the Enforcement of Trade Remedies" final rule and the July 2024 "Regulations Enhancing the Administration of the AD/CVD Trade Remedy Laws" final rule);
they reflect post-2020 statutory changes (EAPA, the Trade Preferences Extension Act, Title VII updates).
The 31 March 2025 correction is purely technical — it fixes typographical and date errors in the December rule and does not alter substantive scope, deadlines, or party obligations. It was issued under the second Trump administration's Commerce leadership but represents continuation, not redirection, of the prior administration's AD/CVD modernization track.
going forward — including the very large Section 232 / Section 301 / IEEPA-adjacent caseload Commerce is fielding under the post-2024 US trade reset.
higher initial transition cost for occasional respondents unfamiliar with the new form templates.
not a new substantive trade restriction. It does not directly alter duty rates, scope determinations, or country/sector coverage.
further substantive AD/CVD rulemaking on top of this annex modernization, or whether the focus will remain on emergency-authority tariffs (IEEPA, Section 232).
high-profile circumvention or scope-extension proceedings now pending against Chinese transshipment routes through Vietnam, Mexico, and Thailand.