Loading…
Loading…
The order was issued under section 25.3 of the Investment Canada Act (ICA) — the same national-security-review authority Canada used in November 2022 to force divestiture of Chinese stakes in three lithium juniors (2022-11-02-canada-ised-critical-minerals-chinese-divestiture-orders). This is a materially harder instrument: rather than ordering divestiture of a minority stake, it orders a wholesale wind-up of Hikvision's Canadian operating business within a fixed 120-day deadline, covering sales, marketing, after-sales support, staffing and contracts. The government determined Hikvision Canada's continued operation would be "injurious to Canada's national security," following review of intelligence-community input — consistent with the US, UK and Australian rationale for restricting Hikvision/Dahua equipment (undisclosed backdoor and data-exfiltration risk in networked camera systems tied to a PRC-linked vendor).
The federal procurement ban is a separate but coordinated instrument: it bars all federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations from buying or using Hikvision products going forward, and triggers an audit-and-removal exercise for equipment already installed in federal facilities — extending the action's reach beyond the single company to the government's own supply chain.
Hikvision filed a legal challenge to the wind-up order in July 2025; a stay motion was later dismissed by the Federal Court, leaving the order in force.
surveillance-technology vendor in Canada (the 2022 precedent only compelled divestiture of minority mining-sector equity stakes).
restricting Hikvision/Dahua equipment from government-linked infrastructure — reinforcing a cross-Five-Eyes pattern of China-linked ICT/surveillance-vendor exclusion.
Hikvision Canada's market exit, contingent on the outcome of its legal challenge.
operators follow Ottawa's lead with their own procurement restrictions.