Loading…
Loading…
ITAC ran an investigation (Report No. 739, initiated 2 August 2024) on an application from Unilever South Africa for a rebate on imported palm oil used in the manufacture of soaps and organic surface-active products. ITAC's finding mirrors the rationale it has used for other SACU input-rebate cases: palm oil is not cultivable anywhere in SACU due to climate, and the technically closest domestic substitutes (sunflower and soybean oil) are not economically viable replacements without substantial reformulation costs. SARS gave effect to the recommendation on 12 September 2025 by inserting rebate item 460.06/1516.20.90/01.08 into Part 2 of Schedule No. 4 (general rebates of customs duties), waiving the general 10% import duty on the qualifying palm-oil input. Access is permit-gated (Schedule 3/4 industrial rebate mechanics), conditional on end-use in the specified manufacturing process rather than an unconditional tariff-line change.
Notably, SARS gazetted this palm-oil rebate (Notice R.6597) on the same day and in the same Government Gazette (53334) as the parallel stainless-steel tubing rebate for Guth South Africa ([2025-09-12-south-africa-sars-itac-report-742-stainless-steel-tubing-rebate](2025-09-12-south-africa-sars-itac-report-742-stainless-steel-tubing-rebate.md), Notice R.6596) — both are ITAC Schedule 3/4 industrial-rebate mechanism instances processed in the same batch.
South Africa), not a small-supplier case like the parallel 742 tubing rebate — the input (palm oil) feeds directly into high-volume consumer soap/surfactant production.
cost reduction for SACU-based soap/surfactant manufacturing — but the measure is non-discriminatory by origin (any qualifying importer under the specified HS line benefits, subject to ITAC permit) rather than a country-targeted trade measure.
Schedule 3/4 rebate permits (administered via ITAC referral) to backfill input-availability gaps, rather than tariff reform or local capacity-building.
ITAC review; no expiry was stated in the sources reviewed.
specifically (as opposed to the broader 1511.90.90 crude-palm-oil line) was not disclosed in sources found — would allow a tighter quant severity estimate.