Loading…
Loading…
Alumina d.o.o.
No GLEIF record found (searched 'Alumina d.o.o. Zvornik' and 'Alumina' — no match for a Bosnian private entity of this size, as expected). The dossier's prior citation for this claim (CIN's 'Gocis Empire' piece) was checked this tick and does NOT support it — that article is dated 2015 and describes an unresolved dispute with a PROPOSED ~30% settlement share for Pavlović, not a finalized 100% acquisition; it was a never-actually-supported citation, now replaced. The 100%-ownership fact itself is independently confirmed current: execution-judgment sale of FG Birač's stake in Alumina to Pavgord was announced and completed in January 2024 (Pavgord had bought the underlying ~122m KM claim from Lithuania's Ukio Bank, per pinpost.ba and corroborating BiH press). Separately, Gordan Pavlović's brother Predrag Pavlović (50%) and Ahmed Hamzić (50%) — via a distinct vehicle, H&P d.o.o. Zvornik, not Pavgord or Gordan Pavlović personally — acquired ArcelorMittal's former Zenica/Prijedor steel operations, approved by BiH's Competition Council on 2025-10-16; the dossier body previously attributed this directly to Gordan Pavlović, which is corrected below. No dossier for Pavgord d.o.o. or H&P d.o.o. exists in this corpus, so parent_slug is not set.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
US customs bill-of-lading records show Zeochem LLC (US) as Alumina d.o.o. Zvornik's largest tracked buyer by shipment volume -- 508 containers, ~10.47m kg gross weight; no share of either party's total sales/purchases disclosed, and full shipment history sits behind a paywall.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 1004 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
Long-term bauxite supply contract; Boksit's own reporting says Alumina accounts for over 60% of revenue, but no source gives a dated, citable share_pct for a specific period, so share_pct is omitted rather than mis-stated. Since the 2024 Pavgord takeover, both companies share a common ultimate owner, removing the arm's-length pricing check an independent buyer would provide.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 1 of its 1 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
As a producer, policy pressure across its produced materials is rising.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.