Loading…
Loading…
BMCC is a Senegal-based company "in the business of mining, production, and sale of Rock Phosphate" (Coromandel, 2022). Incorporated in 2011, it holds a renewable exploitation permit for processing phosphate ore, began active production in 2021, and is commissioning a fixed processing plant to raise throughput.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
Majority owner (53.8%) and sole disclosed buyer of BMCC's rock phosphate; press release states BMCC can meet up to one-third of Coromandel's total rock-phosphate requirement once at full capacity (not yet reached) -- an aggregate/projected figure, not a reported pair share, so share_pct is omitted.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 1004 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
Coromandel press release (2024-09-25) on raising its stake in Senegal-based rock-phosphate miner BMCC to 53.8 percent: 'The Senegal rock is currently being blended at Coromandel's Visakhapatnam unit along with other rock sources'. Origin is the BMCC rock-phosphate mine in Senegal; destination is Coromandel's Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh, India) phosphatic-fertiliser complex. Subsidiary supply, so related party; no tonnage or value disclosed.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 1 of its 1 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.