Loading…
Loading…
Rock Tech Lithium is a Toronto-listed lithium converter: it processes spodumene concentrate into battery-grade lithium hydroxide for EV cathode makers.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
Binding 5-year offtake for 10,000 t/yr battery-grade LiOH announced 2022-10-20; qualification was to begin 2026, but Guben construction/financing is stalled and electrive.com (2026-06-25) reports production may not start until 2029. Refresh 2026-09-29: supply not started (Guben stalled); cell-partner plant destinations unstated.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 986 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
Oct-2022 supply agreement (five-year term from 2026, preceded by a qualification period): Rock Tech to supply Mercedes-Benz an average of 10,000 tonnes/year of battery-grade lithium hydroxide, enough for ~150,000 EVs, from its Guben, Germany converter. Rock Tech supplies the lithium hydroxide to Mercedes' battery-cell partners (Envision AESC, ACC, CATL) rather than to Mercedes directly. Re-checked 2026-09-10, press release confirms volume and term. Refresh 2026-09-29: supply not started (Guben stalled); cell-partner plant destinations unstated.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 1 of its 1 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
As a producer, policy pressure across its produced materials is flat.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.