Loading…
Loading…
Standard Lithium Ltd. (TSXV: SLI, NYSE American: SLI) is a Vancouver, Canada-domiciled developer of direct lithium extraction (DLE) projects on the Smackover Formation brine fields of southern Arkansas and East Texas.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
10-year binding take-or-pay offtake agreement (signed 9 Mar 2026) for 8,000 tonnes/year of battery-grade lithium carbonate from the South West Arkansas Project (initial target capacity 22,500 tpa); deliveries begin at start of commercial production.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 982 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
LANXESS's own press release describes a signed 'understanding' (not a binding supply contract) to supply lithium-rich brine from its El Dorado, Arkansas site to Standard Lithium's battery-grade lithium extraction, plus land lease/infrastructure support; details of the cooperation are stated as subject to ongoing negotiation, so this is a disclosed but preliminary counterparty relationship, not a confirmed offtake.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 1 of its 1 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
As a producer, policy pressure across its produced materials is flat.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.