Loading…
Loading…
Hungary operates two parallel FDI screening regimes:
1. General Regime — implementing EU Regulation 2019/452 since 2019, targeting acquisitions by non-EU/EEA investors in EU-defined critical sectors. 2. Special Regime ("Second Regime") — Hungary-specific cross-sector screening for "strategic companies", originally enacted via Government Decree 561/2022 as a war-emergency measure under the 2022 Russia–Ukraine crisis legal framework. Act L of 2025 elevates this emergency decree to permanent statutory level, alongside other war-emergency instruments covering asylum procedures, EU Court judgment implementation (Case C-123/22), price monitoring, insolvency procedure modifications, defense infrastructure permitting, and carbon quota mechanisms.
Hungarian-registered LLCs (Kft.), closed-end stock companies (Zrt.), public stock companies (Nyrt.), or higher-education institutions whose main or secondary activities fall into the strategic-sector catalogue (energy, transport, communications, telecoms, pharma, food processing, defence, financial services, healthcare).
A notification + approval requirement is triggered when a transaction results in:
AND transaction value reaches HUF 350 million (~EUR 890,000).
Notification is due within 10 days of executing the underlying agreement. The Minister of National Economy originally had 30 business days to decide (extendable by max 15 calendar days); Act XCIII of 2025 extended this to 45 business days.
For photovoltaic generation companies (NACE 35.11'08, "Production of electricity"), excluding sub-50 kVA household installations, the Hungarian state — exercised through MNV Zrt. (Magyar Nemzeti Vagyonkezelő Zrt., the Hungarian National Asset Management Company) — holds statutory right of first refusal on share transactions.
Act L of 2025 modified the appellate avenue for prohibitive decisions: challenges now proceed in administrative contentious court proceedings (instead of the prior non-contentious procedure), aligning the Special Regime with broader Hungarian administrative litigation doctrine.
industries — broader than most EU peer regimes (DE AWG covers defence + critical-tech; FR Décret 2014-479 covers a defined list of activities; NL Wet Vifo covers vital providers + sensitive technology).
mid-market M&A that would fall below most peer-regime thresholds.
buyer, not merely vetoes) — exceptional in EU context.
authorities have used the regime to block / condition Chinese and Russian-linked acquisitions in energy, telecoms, and banking.
but the regime is binding on EU/US strategic acquirers (Vodafone Hungary exits, MKB Bank / Granit Bank / Budapest Bank consolidation, Yettel mobile-operator transactions all routed through the Second Regime in 2023-25).
81/2025 EKD subsidy — despite being a top-tier 2024-26 EV / battery / FDI-screening actor).
vetoes of cross-border M&A (Vodafone Hungary, banking-sector consolidation, energy transactions) are exercised.
strategic acquirers (precedent: state pre-emption on PV plants, blocking BorsodChem / MOL / OTP-Bank cross-border bids).
EU Reg 2019/452 framework: Hungary now joins NL (Wet Vifo, filed 2022-05-18), DE (AWG §§55-62), FR (Décret 2014-479), IT (Golden Power), UK (NSI Act 2021) with a permanent statutory instrument.
of 2025 (canonical via njt.jog.gov.hu; locator at magyarkozlony.hu issue archive).
with EU Reg 2019/452 cross-border notification timelines.
be narrowly construed (audit-enforced security only) or extend to refinancing of existing strategic-company debt portfolios.