Loading…
Loading…
Acron Group is a vertically integrated Russian mineral fertiliser producer, with chemical complexes in Veliky Novgorod (Acron) and the Smolensk region (Dorogobuzh).
GLEIF (checked 2026-08-30) has no LEI record for 'PJSC Acron', 'Acron Group', or 'Dorogobuzh' — fell back to manual research. Kantor is Acron's founder, president and long-standing controlling shareholder/beneficiary (~45.8% combined direct stake per the two lines above). A further ~49.77% of Acron shares have been held in trust management since 2022 by three company executives (JSC Demetra / Pavel Vavilov, JSC Positive Investments and Management / Dmitry Khabrat, JSC Grinfert / Alexander Popov) specifically to keep PJSC Acron compliant with sanctions on Kantor, who the UK and EU placed under sanctions in April 2022 over his Acron shareholding. The EU delisted Kantor in March 2025; UK and Swiss sanctions remained in force as of the sources checked. Separately, in 2024 Russia granted PJSC Acron 'economically significant organization' status, which let Russian courts suspend the corporate rights of the foreign holding vehicles in the chain above (JSC Acron Group restricted March 2024; a Moscow court upheld suspension of Redbrick Investments' corporate rights in June 2024) — the trust-management/nominal-ownership structure above may not reflect current effective control.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 supplier. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
KBR press release (24 Mar 2021) confirms PJSC Acron Group awarded KBR two ammonia-plant revamp contracts at its Novgorod site: process technology license, basic engineering design package, and proprietary equipment (KBRs KRES technology, Horizontal Ammonia Converter), lifting each plants capacity over 30% to 2,300 MTPD. No contract value or share-of-spend disclosed.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Every exposure is read as a buyer dependency by model default, not a company disclosure; the top 3 are its binding chokepoints. If this company actually produces one of these materials rather than buying it, that would be misclassified here — no producer-classifier entry exists for any of them.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.