Loading…
Loading…
The mainland-China trading arm of Richardson RFPD, a specialist distributor of RF, wireless and power semiconductors that is owned by Arrow Electronics (US) (GLEIF lists Arrow Electronics, Inc. as ultimate parent of Richardson RFPD, Inc.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
Sungrow IPO prospectus top-five supplier table. Share is of the BUYER's purchases, not of this seller's sales. Filing also lists it as rank-1 large power-semiconductor supplier in FY2009 (RMB 4.78m) and rank 2 in FY2010 and H1-2011; FY2009 overall rank 2 at 7.98% (as the pre-rename 理察森电子贸易(中国)有限公司).
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
2 other tracked dossiers name this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 1004 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
1,663.70/4,841.01万元. Filing states this entity is 理察森电子贸易(中国)有限公司 renamed (\"现已更名为\") — same lineage as the three rows above, not a new entrant.
The SEPARATE general top-5-supplier table (different basis than the semiconductor-specific rows above: total company procurement, not the semiconductor-only subtotal) — rank-1 overall supplier, H1-2011.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 2 of its 2 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
As a producer, policy pressure across its produced materials is flat.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.