Loading…
Loading…
SSAB AB is a Swedish-Finnish flat-steel producer with EU-safeguard-protected mills at Luleå, Oxelösund and Borlänge (Sweden) and Raahe and Hämeenlinna (Finland), plus scrap-fed electric-arc-furnace plants in the US (Montpelier, Iowa and Mobile/Axis, Alabama, operating as SSAB Americas).
No single majority owner. LKAB and the Finnish state are SSABs two largest disclosed shareholders - both state-linked but different governments, not a coordinated controlling bloc. Remainder is free float.
3 other tracked dossiers name this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 984 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
LKAB's own press release states LKAB and SSAB 'have significant business relationships and conduct strategic development projects together, including HYBRIT'; SSAB is also Sweden's dominant DR/BF-grade steelmaker and the obvious domestic destination for LKAB pellet output per the dossier body's customer list. Flagged related_party: LKAB is also SSAB's largest shareholder (16.0% of votes, 10.5% of capital, per the release dated 2021-06-07 -- this is the newest LKAB-side figure found, not a confirmed current holding) -- a governance-relevant overlap between customer and owner roles, not just a supply relationship. Re-checked 2026-09-23 (wake-minerals-buyers, step 0.5): source_url still live and both quoted claims (the HYBRIT business-relationship sentence and the 16.0%/10.5% holding) verbatim; earlier LKAB releases (2019-12-23: 5.1%; 2020-02-28: 10.5%) show the stake path but nothing later than 2021-06-07 surfaced, and SSAB's shareholder table is JS-rendered and could not be read -- so the related_party flag stands but the current percentage is unconfirmed.
Multi-year frame agreement covering SSAB's inbound raw-material sea transports (iron ore/pellets and HYBRIT fossil-free sponge iron) across the Baltic and North Sea, ~6-7 million tonnes/year; extended March 2025. No share-of-revenue percentage disclosed.
SSAB's own press release: a non-binding letter of intent for SSAB to supply decarbonised steel (SSAB Zero, then SSAB Fossil-free via HYBRIT) to Rheinmetall's production, described as the first such commitment by a defence-equipment manufacturer. No volumes disclosed and the release does not use the term 'armour steel' — do not upgrade this to a confirmed armour-plate supply contract. See prose section below for why this replaces the previously-asserted, uncited thyssenkrupp/Salzgitter claim.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
Every exposure is read as a buyer dependency; the top 3 are its binding chokepoints.
As a buyer, policy pressure across its consumed materials is flat.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
🇪🇺 EU accounts for 100% of severity-weighted pressure.