Loading…
Loading…
VSMPO-AVISMA is a fully integrated Russian titanium producer — one of the world's largest, historically supplying roughly a quarter of global titanium mill-product demand.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 984 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
Titanium mill-product supplier, the largest single-country supply concentration behind Airbus's highest-scored material (titanium, structural Ti-6Al-4V — pylons, landing-gear, fasteners). Canada added VSMPO-AVISMA to its Russia sanctions list in February 2024; Airbus Canada told Reuters it 'has obtained the necessary authorization to secure Airbus operations in compliance with the applicable sanctions' (quote dated 2024-04-24/25), and Global Trade Alert's own record (globaltradealert.org/intervention/135961, dated 2024-04-23) independently confirms the Canadian government granted a permit rather than enforcing a cutoff. Titanium from this relationship serves the A350 line (Toulouse, FR) per the same reporting, not the Canada-assembled A220 — hence flow RU>FR. Press estimates (not an Airbus-disclosed figure, so not written as share_pct) put pre-2022 dependence around 60% of Airbus titanium and current sourcing around 20% and falling as of 2024-2025; treat both numbers as approximate and unconfirmed by Airbus itself. Confidence held at secondary because the Airbus quote reaches this dossier via wire-service reporting (Reuters, redistributed by The Globe and Mail), not a company-issued statement fetched directly. This closes the titanium gap this dossier's own Sources list had flagged (titanium-diversification statements post-2022) but left unstructured.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
This company sits on the supply side for 2 of its 2 materials — a restriction on those is a tailwind, not a headwind.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.