Loading…
Loading…
Pick a company to see where it actually produces — every country in its footprint, shaded by capacity share — overlaid with the countries whose register actions name it (severity ring + action count), plus violet arcs to the chokepoint countries its material inputs depend on. The map is a lens; the dossier and register are the source of record.
EVPÚ produces across 2 countries — 80% of mapped capacity sits in 🇸🇰 SK (HQ 🇸🇰 SK).
material exposures: copper · silicon · aluminium
No register action names EVPÚ yet — footprint only.
Its 3 scored input materials trace to 1 supplier country — 1 refines >70% in a single country. Top input chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China (silicon 80%, aluminium 61%, copper 48%) — nearest ex-🇨🇳 silicon producer: 🇩🇪 Germany ~7% — ~6-12mo to ramp (share-of-stage heuristic, not a sourced qualification time).Armed chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China has itself issued 2 register actions restricting the input it already dominates — silicon (2) — max severity 4/5. This share is a demonstrated lever, not just a concentration.Latest: China MOFCOM Preliminary Anti-Dumping Ruling on Japanese Dichlorosilane (DCS) Imports · 2026-09-07 · 30d ago
Substitutes & lead-time to switch: copper → · silicon → · aluminium →
Named counterparties: this dossier names 1 firm with a source; 1 is in this corpus with a mapped footprint.Patria Oyj (customer) 🇫🇮 FI
Reading the map: green shading = the company's production countries by capacity share, with dots at facility cities (dashed = approximate, country-level). Violet arcs = INPUT DEPENDENCIES — they run from the country that dominates world production/refining of a material the company consumes to the company's base; the % is that country's share of world supply at the named stage, NOT an import/export volume. Severity rings = countries whose register actions name the company.