Loading…
Loading…
Pick a company to see where it actually produces — every country in its footprint, shaded by capacity share — overlaid with the countries whose register actions name it (severity ring + action count), plus violet arcs to the chokepoint countries its material inputs depend on. The map is a lens; the dossier and register are the source of record.
Neometals Ltd produces across 3 countries — 40% of mapped capacity sits in 🇺🇸 United States (HQ 🇦🇺 Australia).
material exposures: lithium · potash · vanadium · titanium
No register action names Neometals Ltd yet — footprint only.
Its 4 scored input materials trace to 2 supplier countries — 1 refines >70% in a single country. Top input chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China (vanadium 79%, titanium 70%, lithium 65%) — nearest ex-🇨🇳 vanadium producer: 🇷🇺 Russia ~16% — ~0-6mo to ramp (share-of-stage heuristic, not a sourced qualification time).Armed chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China has itself issued 1 register action restricting the input it already dominates — vanadium (1) — max severity 2/5. This share is a demonstrated lever, not just a concentration.Latest: China (Xiangxi, Hunan Province): Launch of CNY 1 Billion Xiangxi Industrial Development Guidance Fund · 2025-05-07 · 517d ago
Substitutes & lead-time to switch: lithium →
Named counterparties: this dossier names 1 firm with a source; 0 are in this corpus with a mapped footprint.1 named firm could not be placed on the map — named in a primary source but not yet onboarded as a dossier, or onboarded without a production footprint. Named, not missing.
Reading the map: green shading = the company's production countries by capacity share, with dots at facility cities (dashed = approximate, country-level). Violet arcs = INPUT DEPENDENCIES — they run from the country that dominates world production/refining of a material the company consumes to the company's base; the % is that country's share of world supply at the named stage, NOT an import/export volume. Severity rings = countries whose register actions name the company.