Loading…
Loading…
Pick a company to see where it actually produces — every country in its footprint, shaded by capacity share — overlaid with the countries whose register actions name it (severity ring + action count), plus violet arcs to the chokepoint countries its material inputs depend on. The map is a lens; the dossier and register are the source of record.
Newmont Corporation produces across 10 countries — 24% of mapped capacity sits in 🇦🇺 Australia (HQ 🇺🇸 United States).
material exposures: copper · silver · zinc
8 register actions name Newmont Corporation, issued from 6 countries (top: 🇬🇭 GH ×3) — 3 of those also sit in its production footprint (regulator ∩ producer).
Latest: 🇬🇭 Ghana Growth and Sustainability Levy (Amendment) Act 2026 — Mining Levy Reduced from 3% to 1% · 2026-03-13 · 209d ago
Its 3 scored input materials trace to 2 supplier countries. Top input chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China (copper 48%, zinc 32%) — nearest ex-🇨🇳 copper producer: 🇨🇩 DR Congo ~10% — ~6-12mo to ramp (share-of-stage heuristic, not a sourced qualification time).
Substitutes & lead-time to switch: copper → · silver →
Overlap node: 🇬🇭 GH sits in two of the three layers — 13% of mapped capacity · 3 actions naming Newmont Corporation (max sev 5/5). It regulates the company inside its own borders — exposure is operational, not just trade-facing. its GH actions →Also multi-layer: 🇨🇳 China (regulates + supplies) · 🇵🇬 PG (produces + regulates) · 🇦🇺 Australia (produces + regulates) · +1 more
Reading the map: green shading = the company's production countries by capacity share, with dots at facility cities (dashed = approximate, country-level). Violet arcs = INPUT DEPENDENCIES — they run from the country that dominates world production/refining of a material the company consumes to the company's base; the % is that country's share of world supply at the named stage, NOT an import/export volume. Severity rings = countries whose register actions name the company.