Loading…
Loading…
Base rate computed from analyst-asserted responds_to: edges in the reverse direction (target-country → issuer-country) for prior issuer-actions on the same target. Modal type + lag percentiles only — not a model output. Treat as a historical anchor for sizing counter-response scenarios, not a forecast in itself.
This is the first concrete deliverable from the US-China Board of Trade, the standing bilateral mechanism whose scope and operation USTR opened for public comment on June 5, 2026 (2026-06-05-us-ustr-china-board-of-trade-rfc). The Board published working procedures, terms of reference for the "30-FOR-30" framework, and matched product lists: US goods (agricultural products, wood products, cosmetics) recommended for reduced Chinese tariff treatment, and Chinese goods (small appliances, toys, decorations) recommended for reduced US tariff treatment, each list valued at roughly $30 billion.
Both the White House release and USTR's statement are explicit that these are recommendations — actual tariff modification requires a further decision by each government "consistent with their respective domestic laws and processes." No specific ad-valorem rate or effective date for any tariff change is disclosed; stage: proposed reflects that the lists are not yet a binding tariff action.
Severity is rated 2 (low-moderate) and mixed: the measure is not yet a binding tariff change (which caps severity while stage: proposed), but the primary source discloses a concrete quantum — roughly $30 billion of goods recommended for preferential treatment on each side — which anchors the magnitude.coverage_share figure above.
flow from the Board of Trade architecture, providing a path to relief below the Busan 10% reciprocal-rate floor for the named product categories.
toys) are non-sensitive consumer/agricultural categories — consistent with the RFC's "non-sensitive goods" scoping question being resolved toward low-strategic-value goods first.
tariff changes; until one is issued, this stays a recommendation.
reductions (if any) will be proposed?
legal action (e.g., a Section 301 exclusion process on the US side) to give effect to the recommendations?
the same May 2026 Beijing summit?