Loadingโฆ
Loadingโฆ
Aluminij d.d. Mostar is a Bosnian aluminum works, majority-owned by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, that shut its primary electrolysis smelter in July 2019 after its power supplier cut electricity over unpaid bills.
GLEIF has no LEI record for 'Aluminij Industries', 'Aluminij', 'Aluminij d.d.', or 'M.T. Abraham Group' (all searched, no hits) โ fell back to manual research. Aluminij d.d. Mostar (the BA-registered asset owner, hq_country above) remains majority-owned by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; Aluminij Industries d.o.o. (the operating lessee, ownership_country: IL) is a subsidiary of M.T. Abraham Group, an Israeli-led group, per Reuters and Wikipedia. No stake_pct disclosed for the lease/operating-subsidiary relationship (leases aren't equity stakes); no parent dossier exists in this corpus for M.T. Abraham Group so no parent_slug is set.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship โ never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 supplier. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
2023-05 agreement (part of a combined ~$141m/250m BAM package that also named Duferco separately) for Glencore to build a 60MW solar plant and a recycled-aluminium recycling facility at the Mostar site -- feedstock/power supply into Aluminij, not an offtake sale of Aluminij's output. No share_pct disclosed. Duferco's parallel automotive/wire agreement is a second candidate counterparty not captured in this row pending its own confirmation.
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists โ most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Another tracked dossier names this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure โ this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 990 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
Aluminij's own site states it has 'an assigned and direct railway system connecting the factory to the Port of Ploce,' giving it 'global reach to all destinations' โ the factory (Bosnia's largest importer/exporter, alumina-based aluminium smelting) sits on a dedicated rail spur into Luka Ploฤe's terminals. Aluminij's page does not itself name bauxite/alumina as the cargo moved via Ploฤe (Luka Ploฤe's own terminals page separately lists bauxite among the New Bulk Cargo Terminal's regular commodities), hence secondary rather than primary-source confidence for this specific pairing.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship โ most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
Every exposure is read as a buyer dependency; the top 3 are its binding chokepoints.
As a buyer, policy pressure across its consumed materials is rising.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this companyโs materials โ a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.