Loading…
Loading…
Melexis NV (Euronext: MELE, BE) is a Belgian fabless/fab-light semiconductor company specialising in mixed-signal ICs for automotive applications. Every new car produced globally contains on average 18 Melexis chips. Revenue was EUR 932.8 M in FY2024.
Nov 2023: co-founding families ended joint holding company Xtrion and split into two independent 25% holding vehicles (Elex N.V. = Duchatelet family; Sensinnovat bvba = De Winter-Chombar family), formally ending acting-in-concert control per Melexis's own transparency filing. No single shareholder controls Melexis. GLEIF (checked 2026-09-07, LEI 549300QRPSGOJRPUFO80, ISSUED) reports no parent on file, consistent with this.
Named counterparties identified by open-source research and written only where a primary source states the relationship — never inferred from sector or co-mention. 1 supplier, 1 customer-side. This is a partial view: it covers the relationships we could evidence, not the company's full supply base.
Melexis's own press release (25-Aug-2026) announces a Master Purchase Agreement making Melexis a direct supplier to BYD's global procurement organization, covering sensors/driver ICs for powertrain, thermal management, lighting, braking, steering and battery applications on future EV/NEV platforms. Formalizes a prior indirect (through intermediaries) relationship; no contract value, guaranteed volume, share of Melexis revenue, or list of BYD models is disclosed, so no share_pct/share_of is stated.
Melexis's own Belgian Code art. 7:97 related-party-transaction disclosure covers its wafer long-term agreements with X-FAB: 2023-2025 LTA for 350nm/180nm nodes and a 2024-2027 LTA for 110nm, with an operational capacity-reservation prepayment of ~EUR 189.2 million. X-FAB's share of revenue from Melexis is not filed here: no primary X-FAB figure was re-checked (secondary write-ups conflict, 40% vs 45% for FY2023).
Scope. Absence of a counterparty here is not evidence that none exists — most commercial sourcing is confidential and never becomes public. Rows without a share figure mean no share was disclosed, not that the relationship is small.
Every exposure is read as a buyer dependency by model default, not a company disclosure; the top 3 are its binding chokepoints. If this company actually produces one of these materials rather than buying it, that would be misclassified here — no producer-classifier entry exists for any of them.
As a buyer, policy pressure across its consumed materials is rising.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.