Loading…
Loading…
Pick a company to see where it actually produces — every country in its footprint, shaded by capacity share — overlaid with the countries whose register actions name it (severity ring + action count), plus violet arcs to the chokepoint countries its material inputs depend on. The map is a lens; the dossier and register are the source of record.
PLS Group Ltd. produces across 1 country — 100% of mapped capacity sits in 🇦🇺 Australia (HQ 🇦🇺 Australia).
material exposures: lithium · tantalum
No register action names PLS Group Ltd. yet — footprint only.
Its 2 scored input materials trace to 1 supplier country. Top input chokepoint: 🇨🇳 China (lithium 65%, tantalum 50%) — nearest ex-🇨🇳 lithium producer: 🇨🇱 Chile ~12% — ~0-6mo to ramp (share-of-stage heuristic, not a sourced qualification time).
Substitutes & lead-time to switch: lithium →
Named counterparties: this dossier names 2 firms with a source; 2 are in this corpus with a mapped footprint, and 2 of those produce in a country already on this map (🇦🇺 Australia · 🇨🇳 China) — the named end of an exposure the country layers show anonymously.POSCO Holdings Inc. (customer, related party) 🇰🇷 KR ◆ · Ganfeng Lithium (customer) 🇨🇳 CN ◆ ◆ = produces in a country already on this map.3 other dossiers name PLS Group Ltd. from the other side (customer).
Reading the map: green shading = the company's production countries by capacity share, with dots at facility cities (dashed = approximate, country-level). Violet arcs = INPUT DEPENDENCIES — they run from the country that dominates world production/refining of a material the company consumes to the company's base; the % is that country's share of world supply at the named stage, NOT an import/export volume. Severity rings = countries whose register actions name the company.