Loading…
Loading…
What they make, where they produce, the materials that matter — then what is coming, what it would do to the business, and the moves available. Sector: mining metals. Company profile →
5E Advanced Materials (Nasdaq: FEAM) is a US boron company with one asset: the 5E Boron Americas (Fort Cady) Complex in the Mojave Desert of southern California, held 100% through subsidiary 5E Boron Americas, LLC. The deposit is colemanite — a calcium borate — and is worked by in-situ leach rather than open pit: acid solution is injected into the ore body, and boric acid is crystallised from the pregnant solution, with gypsum or calcium chloride precipitated from the remaining liquor and the balance recycled back into the formation. The company describes the project as the largest known new conventional boron deposit outside Turkey, and has moved from small-scale facility operation into first commercial boric acid deliveries, with ~14 customers across eight market segments qualified and several non-binding offtake heads of agreement signed.
Its FY2026 10-K attaches a Preliminary Feasibility Study dated 2026-09-17.
Verbatim from the dossier's “What they do” section — sources on the company profile.
No production footprint is recorded in its dossier yet — its HQ country is 🇺🇸 United States, a registration fact, not a production or sales claim. We say so rather than guess.
Of everything in its products, we track the critical inputs — the materials whose supply is concentrated in few countries, policy-exposed, or hard to substitute — because those are the ones a single measure can move. Each carries its role in the product, quoted from the dossier's own exposure note.
Lithium — a resource, not yet a product. The Fort Cady ore carries lithium at parts-per-million grade and the 10-K lists lithium carbonate only among "potentially other byproducts". It is listed here because a second US lithium unit would be strategically material *if* it is ever produced, and deliberately carries no magnitude band: nothing in the filing quantifies it as a shar…
Sulfur — a bulk process input on the consumption side. Sulfuric acid is a named reagent in the flowsheet (it drives the gypsum precipitation step that regenerates HCl), and the 10-K flags sulfuric acid utilisation as a cost driver keyed to the ore's calcium-to-boron ratio. Not a trace additive but a continuously consumed bulk chemical; the filing discloses no tonnage, so no band is recorded.
Boron — the entire business, as a PRODUCER, not a consumer. Boric acid is the sole revenue product; every other exposure here is downstream of the borate flowsheet. This is a *supply position*: policy or price action on borates flows straight to the top line rather than to input cost.
The dossier also records the materials it investigated and rejected — the list above is narrowed deliberately, not cherry-picked. Its own words:
Scope. The non-critical remainder of the bill of materials — structural steel, polymers, glass and the like — is not tracked here because it is not supply-constrained: this section covers the constrained inputs, which is where policy risk concentrates, not a full bill of materials.
The top 5 are ranked mechanically — what the instrument does (its transmission class: an export ban is not a reporting duty), × how close to law (stage-derived likelihood band, never a probability) × how much of your tracked bill of materials it touches. Each unfolds as a chain: trigger → what it hits → the response the instrument actually calls for. A measure touching a material you produce can be an opportunity, not a threat.
CN · stage passed-vote → high likelihood · touches sulfur · flagged 25 Jul 2026, 74d pending
Effective 1 May 2026 China suspended exports of all ordinary industrial sulfuric acid — including the acid co-produced from copper/zinc smelting — with only electronic-grade high-purity acid still exportable under special approval; reporting attributes the measure to a joint Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) + General Administration of Customs (GACC) notice, expected to run through end-2026. Sulfuric acid is the indispensable leach/process input for copper hydrometallurgy (SX-EW), phosphate-fertilizer production, and battery-metal (nickel HPAL, lithium) processing, so a China export halt tightens a systemic upstream chokepoint hitting seaborne-acid buyers (Chile/Peru copper, Morocco/India phosphate, Indonesia nickel). This is a DISTINCT instrument from the already-filed 2025-12-12-china-ndrc-phosphate-fertilizer-export-suspension (finished-fertilizer export control) and 2026-03-31-russia-decree-350-sulphur-export-ban-extension (elemental sulphur, different country/product) — it controls the acid itself.
source ↗Sulfur — a bulk process input on the consumption side. Sulfuric acid is a named reagent in the flowsheet (it drives the gypsum precipitation step that regenerates HCl), and the 10-K flags sulfuric acid utilisation as a cost driver keyed to the ore's calcium-to-boron ratio. Not a trace additive but a continuously consumed bulk chemical; the filing discloses no tonnage, so no band is recorded.
China supplies 23% of world sulfur mining — that share of your supply base is what this measure cuts off.
Supply outside 🇨🇳 CN: 🇺🇸 US 17% · 🇷🇺 RU 15% · 🇸🇦 SA 15% · 🇦🇪 AE 12% — shares renormalised after removing CN.
BR · stage passed-vote → high likelihood · touches lithium · flagged 19 Jun 2026, 110d pending
First federal statutory framework for critical and strategic minerals; establishes CMCE oversight committee, R$2B Mineral Activity Guarantee Fund (0. 2% gross revenue levy on critical-mineral companies), mandatory 0. 3% gross revenue R&D investment, 20% tax credits for domestic mineral transformation projects; limits raw-mineral exports where domestic processing capacity exists; covers niobium explicitly (CBMM/CMOC supply ~85% of global niobium — Brazil is a structural chokepoint); Chamber passed 343-97 on 7 May 2026, Senate review pending
source ↗Lithium — a resource, not yet a product. The Fort Cady ore carries lithium at parts-per-million grade and the 10-K lists lithium carbonate only among "potentially other byproducts". It is listed here because a second US lithium unit would be strategically material *if* it is ever produced, and deliberately carries no magnitude band: nothing in the filing quantifies it as a shar…
This changes the form of what Brazil exports, not whether you can buy: raw/unprocessed exports are restricted while domestically processed material stays available — that is the measure's own mechanism. Your Brazil-origin raw feed becomes processed-only; the route is a value-added purchase or a Brazil processing partner, not a supplier switch.
lithium — you sit on the supply side: a measure tightening others' supply pushes buyers toward you, so your move is positioning, not substitution (chokepoint page).
CD · stage passed-vote → high likelihood · touches lithium · flagged 14 Jun 2026, 115d pending
Royalty near-triples on Manono lithium project (Zijin Mining/La Cominière, DRC's first industrial lithium mine commissioning June 2026) and all DRC tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, REE operators; reprices extraction economics across the entire DRC critical-mineral portfolio
source ↗Lithium — a resource, not yet a product. The Fort Cady ore carries lithium at parts-per-million grade and the 10-K lists lithium carbonate only among "potentially other byproducts". It is listed here because a second US lithium unit would be strategically material *if* it is ever produced, and deliberately carries no magnitude band: nothing in the filing quantifies it as a shar…
The filed text doesn't state this instrument's mechanism clearly enough to classify, so we don't guess a response — the measure text above is the read.
lithium — you sit on the supply side: a measure tightening others' supply pushes buyers toward you, so your move is positioning, not substitution (chokepoint page).
EU · stage awaiting-signature → high likelihood · touches lithiumboron · flagged 15 Jun 2026, 114d pending
Establishes the first legally binding "safe level" benchmark for EU strategic stocks of each of the 17 strategic raw materials listed in the CRMA Annex I; benchmarks used as reference by Member States, financial institutions, and industrial consumers to assess strategic supply risk; mandated every 2 years, so this is the first edition setting the baseline; informs CRMA Art. 23 monitoring obligations and is the evidential basis for Art. 24 corporate-reporting thresholds
source ↗Lithium — a resource, not yet a product. The Fort Cady ore carries lithium at parts-per-million grade and the 10-K lists lithium carbonate only among "potentially other byproducts". It is listed here because a second US lithium unit would be strategically material *if* it is ever produced, and deliberately carries no magnitude band: nothing in the filing quantifies it as a shar…
Boron — the entire business, as a PRODUCER, not a consumer. Boric acid is the sole revenue product; every other exposure here is downstream of the borate flowsheet. This is a *supply position*: policy or price action on borates flows straight to the top line rather than to input cost.
This is a reporting / disclosure obligation — it does not prohibit importing from anywhere, so there is no supplier to switch and we list none. What you must do is what the measure's own text above describes: map the supply chain it covers, run the audit, and file. Its text states no filing deadline — we don't invent one.
Mapping your supply chain is exactly the work this obligation requires — your MacroLens exposure report is that map's starting point.
CN · stage awaiting-signature → high likelihood · touches lithium · flagged 28 Jun 2026, 101d pending
Chinese battery-materials major Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt (603799. SH) signed a BINDING Scheme Implementation Deed (7 May 2026) to acquire 100% of Atlantic Lithium Ltd (AIM/ASX: ALL) for ~US$210M all-cash (US$0. 25486/share; 26. 6% premium), gaining control of the Ewoyaa lithium project — Ghana's first parliament-ratified lithium mine (Central Region, 15-yr lease ratified Mar 2026). The Atlantic Lithium board unanimously recommends; largest holder Assore (~26. 4%) supports; deed has no financing/DD conditions. This is a Chinese-SOE-adjacent capture of a West-African hard-rock lithium chokepoint that had been positioned as a NON-China / Western-aligned supply source (Atlantic Lithium previously had US DFC / Piedmont offtake-JV ties), so the transaction re-prices Ewoyaa from a diversification asset into Chinese-controlled lithium supply — directly relevant to the cn-outbound-mining-fdi exposure series and to Ghana's local-ownership/beneficiation policy.
source ↗Lithium — a resource, not yet a product. The Fort Cady ore carries lithium at parts-per-million grade and the 10-K lists lithium carbonate only among "potentially other byproducts". It is listed here because a second US lithium unit would be strategically material *if* it is ever produced, and deliberately carries no magnitude band: nothing in the filing quantifies it as a shar…
This governs deal-making — stakes, acquisitions, joint ventures — not the flow of material. Your purchasing is untouched; it matters to you only if you plan an investment or partnership inside its scope. No supplier alternatives apply.
Prohibits raw mineral exports unless 30% value-addition achieved domestically; affects Chinese mining companies (dominant in Nigerian critical minerals sector), Western offtake agreements, and all fo…
Cabinet-cleared bill to replace the 2006 Minerals and Mining Act, Act 703: raises mining royalties from current 3–5% range to 9–12% (price-linked sliding scale), introduces a new medium-scale mining…
On 28-Nov-2025 European Metals Holdings announced the Czech government approved a grant of up to EUR 360M under the Ministry of Industry and Trade's "Strategic Investments for a Climate-Neutral Econo…
In March 2026 the outgoing Boric administration reportedly fast-tracked and submitted to the Contraloría General de la República (Chile's comptroller) a batch of ~5 further Contratos Especiales de Op…
Minister of Mines, Petroleum and Energy Mamadou Sangafowa-Coulibaly formally launched the revision of Côte d'Ivoire's 2014 Mining Code on 13 June 2026, standing up an expert team drawn from his minis…
Draft law amending Morocco's 2015 Mining Code (led by the Ministry of Energy Transition and Sustainable Development, Minister Leila Benali), with public consultations reported open since ~Feb 2025.
Mongolia's cabinet approved and submitted to the State Great Khural a draft amending ~40% of the 2006 Minerals Law: (i) cuts the maximum exploration-licence duration from 12 to 6 years while raising…
New general mining law (distinct from PL-157 lithium/evaporites bill already in index): 20-year tax stability regime for mining projects; eliminates the 12.
10% free-carried state equity in ALL new mining and energy projects (no-cost government stake via Epangelo Mining); consultations on 51% Namibian ownership in new mining ventures; maximum royalty rat…
RESourceEU (COM(2025) 945, 3 Dec 2025) commits the Commission to establish a **European Critical Raw Materials Centre** in early 2026 with four functions: (a) generate **systemic market intelligence…
Tanzania's Ministry of Minerals (Minister Anthony Mavunde) has FINALISED a Critical and Strategic Minerals Strategy that takes legal effect only once the Government formally approves and gazettes the…
Binding plurilateral trade agreement among like-minded partners (US, EU, Japan and FORGE coalition members) establishing coordinated trade measures for critical mineral supply chains — including bord…
Second wave of CRMA Art.
On 10 July 2026 the African Development Bank Group, with the African Union Commission, the AfCFTA Secretariat and UNECA, convened African ministers of mining/energy/industry in Abidjan for the "Minis…
On 11 May 2026 Huayou Cobalt announced an all-cash agreement to acquire ASX/AIM-listed Atlantic Lithium for USD 210m, taking control of the Ewoyaa project (~1.
On 11 Feb 2025 the Attorney General of Canada filed a Notice of Application (Federal Court file T-472-25) seeking a court order under ICA s.
Ministry of Mines issued operational guidelines for the Mining Sector Reforms component under Scheme for Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASCI) FY2026-27, with total ₹5,000 crore…
2 of 38 filed an explicit in-force stage; the rest (flagged below) default from an absent stage: field, not a filed assertion. Each links to the register entry with its primary source.
For a material it buys, a restriction tightens supply and raises input cost — a headwind. For the 2 it produces, the same restriction supports pricing — a tailwind. Scores are footprint-adjusted and buyer-relative (0–100, higher = more exposed).
Its customers sit in ev batteries, permanent magnets, ev motors, wind turbines, defence… — read via the graph's critical minerals node, the nearest equivalent of its sector. A measure supporting those sectors supports demand for this company's products; one restricting them puts that demand at risk. The sign shown is the mechanical read — click through to judge whether a measure protects or constrains the customer.
For each bought material: the ex-controller producers a procurement team can actually reach, from the alternatives map, viability-gated — each name carries its deployment status (with the verbatim dossier phrase it rests on), a capture check against the measure being escaped, and any contracted-capacity evidence. Deployable-now names sort first; a developer with zero tonnes is shown demoted, never dressed up as a switch you can make today. Tradability is inherited from the listing layer, never guessed.
This company sits on the supply side of lithium. Restrictions by 🇨🇳 CN push buyers toward ex-CN producers — the strategy is to be visible where those buyers look: the lithium chokepoint page and the watchlist.
This company sits on the supply side of boron. Restrictions by 🇹🇷 TR push buyers toward ex-TR producers — the strategy is to be visible where those buyers look: the boron chokepoint page and the watchlist.
lib/policy-transmission.ts): an export prohibition in the measure's name/text → supply restriction; a raw/unprocessed-export limit or local-processing mandate → beneficiation (form change, not unavailability); reporting/disclosure/due-diligence language → compliance obligation; tariff/trade-remedy language → import cost; subsidy/fast-track/relaxation language → support; investment-screening/M&A language → investment control. When the text carries no signal we fall back to the action-type default and label the chip inferred; when neither exists the card says so and derives no response — we never assert a class the evidence doesn't support.lib/iptm-material-country-production.ts; mining stage preferred, refining as fallback — the stage and source year are in each figure's hover text). Ex-issuer supply removes the ISSUING country and renormalises the remaining listed shares (so they sum to 100% of what's left) — alternatives to the country making the rule, never a default ex-China list. Where the issuer holds no measurable share, the card says so plainly instead of implying supply loss.lib/alternative-viability.ts): each named alternative carries a deployment status — operating / ramping / restarting / development / unknown — derived from word-boundary signal phrases in its own dossier (“operating since 1896”, “restarting the … mine”, “FID taken”), and the verbatim matched phrase is shown as the basis so the claim is auditable; a dossier with no signal stays unknown, never guessed. Any evidenced production date is quoted verbatim (“first production targeted H2 2029” → “no tonnes before 2029”) — we never synthesize one. A measure whose own text claims extraterritorial / re-export / de-minimis / foreign-direct-product / percentage-of-value scope triggers the origin-switching warning above the list: such a rule follows the material, not the seller, so a foreign-made alternative can still be captured. Same-issuer register actions targeting an alternative's country and material mark it may be captured, with the entries linked. “Capacity partly committed” lines quote the dossier verbatim — we hold no structured free-capacity numbers and never imply a utilisation figure.How MacroLens tracks this for you. The policy register files new measures daily and this page recomputes from it — the same chokepoints are monitored live on the watchlist and in the full register.