Geopolitical Supply-Risk Report·EU CRMA Art. 20–25 assessment·MacroLens · CiconiaLabs

JSW Steel Ltd

4 critical materials scored · binding chokepoint: Manganese (🇨🇳 CN 90% of refining) · 40 restrictive government measures on record

Subject

JSWSTEEL.BO · 🇮🇳 IN

Sector

mining-metals

Materials scored

As of

2026-09-30

Risk Office verdict

Elevated · 66/100Company supply-risk index

The binding exposure is Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN controls 90% of global refining. On this company's production footprint that scores 71/100 (neutral exposure; global 69). The register holds 40 restrictive government measures touching this company's materials — each traced to its primary source below.

Peer rank · Manganese JSW Steel Ltd is the 284th-most-exposed of the 446 named companies we track on 🇨🇳 CN's Manganese chokepoint; the most-exposed is Rivian Automotive, Inc. (83/100). Ranked on the same footprint-adjusted buyer score as above — a relative read of an existing metric, not a new one.

Competitor cohort · mining metals

JSW Steel Ltd ranks 170th of 449 verified mining metals companies, tied with 8 others at 66.

95🇺🇸 TdVibDysprosium
95🇦🇺 Northern Minerals LimitedDysprosium
93🇺🇸 Alta Resource TechnologiesDysprosium
93🇬🇧 Mkango Resources LimitedDysprosium
93🇨🇦 Defense Metals Corp.Dysprosium
93🇨🇦 Ucore Rare MetalsDysprosium
92🇺🇸 Phoenix TailingsDysprosium
91🇨🇦 Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp.Dysprosium
91🇦🇺 Arafura Rare Earths LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 Hastings Technology Metals LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 VHM LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 Vital Metals LtdDysprosium
90🇨🇦 NioCorp DevelopmentsDysprosium
90🇺🇸 Energy Fuels Inc.Dysprosium
66🇮🇳 JSW Steel LtdManganese

Same sector_primary, ranked on the company supply-risk index. Restricted to hand-verified dossiers — 127 further mining metals companies are tracked but auto-onboarded, and excluded here because their exposure list is a sector template rather than company research. A peer scoring lower is the useful read: it usually means a different production geography or a qualified second source.

Company supply-risk index 66/100 — the binding chokepoint dominates, with a modest add for exposure breadth across 4 scored materials. Buyer-relative (first-order): weighted by where the company produces (IN 85% · US 12% · IT 3%, estimated split — no cited source states these exact shares), applied across all materials — it does not yet trace each input to its specific sourcing step.

JSW Steel Ltd

The exposure report is at /intelligence/dossiers/jsw-steel/report.

What they do

JSW Steel Ltd is India's largest steel producer by capacity, headquartered in Mumbai with integrated plants at Vijayanagar (Karnataka, 17.5 MTPA — its largest site), Dolvi (Maharashtra), Bhushan Power & Steel (Jharsuguda, Odisha), Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) and Salem Works (Tamil Nadu). Its product mix spans commodity flat/long steel (HR, CR, TMT rebar, galvanized/galvalume) and two higher-value lines that carry the company's real critical-mineral exposure: electrical steel (grain-oriented and non-grain-oriented, for transformers and motors) and special alloy steel for automotive, defence and bearing applications.

Critical-material exposure

Manganese — bulk input. JSW holds a captive manganese ore reserve

(0.505 Mt) at the Narayanposhi composite block in Odisha, alongside its iron ore mines, and manganese is a base alloying element (as ferro-manganese) added at percent-level concentrations in nearly all of JSW's steel grades for strength and hot-workability. Manganese supply is geographically concentrated (South Africa, Gabon, Australia dominate global ore output), so India's captive-plus-import manganese chain is a real chokepoint exposure even though JSW itself holds some domestic reserve.

Silicon — structural component (in electrical steel, not trace). JSW

operates a CRNGO (cold-rolled non-grain-oriented) electrical steel line and is investing ~$669m with Japan's JFE Steel to add CRGO (grain-oriented) electrical steel capacity to cut import dependence. Electrical steel is silicon-alloyed (typically ~3% Si by weight) specifically to raise electrical resistivity for transformer and motor cores — silicon is not incidental here, it is the defining alloy of the product line.

Chromium, nickel, vanadium — dropped 2026-09-26. JSW's Salem Works

special-alloy page names only "IS 1570 / SAE series" grades and automotive, defence/aerospace and bearing end-uses; it gives no chromium, nickel or vanadium content, so no company-specific exposure is documented and the rows are excluded pending a primary source.

Dropped from the prior sector-derived list: cobalt, copper and aluminium

have no documented JSW-specific bill-of-materials support (aluminium appears only as a trace deoxidizer common to virtually all steelmaking, not a differentiating exposure) and are excluded pending verification.

Sources

JSW Steel — Special Alloy Steel product page (Salem Works, automotive/defence/bearing end-uses)
Mining Technology — JSW Steel secures Narayanposhi iron ore mine in Odisha (captive manganese ore reserve, 0.505 Mt)
Ferro-Alloys.com — JSW Steel and Japan's JFE Steel to invest $669 million (CRGO electrical steel JV, silicon exposure)

Named counterparties — who actually buys and sells

From the company’s own filings and dated disclosures — top-5 concentration and related-party tables where the filer’s regime compels them, named supply and offtake agreements where it does not. This is a disclosure, not a netting: a named supplier concentration is shown beside the exposure score and never adjusts it. Figures are the fiscal years labelled, not a current snapshot.

The full counterparty breakdownShow

Named suppliers (2)

Korea Zinc Company, Ltd. · 2025, per Indian import records (ImportGenius)arm's length customs secondarysource ↗
Indian import records list shipper Korea Zinc Company, Ltd. Onsan Complex (Ulsan, South Korea) and consignee JSW Steel Coated Products Limited (JSW Steel galvanizing subsidiary, Maharashtra, India), arrival 2025-05-20, 'CONTINUED GALVANIZING GRADE ZINC IN JUMBO (CGGJ)', 253.001 MTS. No value stated.
CBMM (Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração) · FY2024arm's length company-disclosure primary-sourcesource ↗
CBMM's own 2024 Sustainability Report, CEO letter: 'the recognition of our ESG efforts by three key customers in the Indian market—JSL, JSW, and Tata Steel, affirming that we are on the right path in managing our practices.' No volume or share disclosed.

Alternative track — a counterparty read from primary filings, never merged into the exposure score. Absence of a name is not absence of a relationship: Filers name only the counterparties their regime compels them to name, and several of this company’s largest are disclosed by size with no name at all.

The exposure register

Ranked by buyer-relative risk, highest first.

2 of 2 of your scored CRMA-strategic materials breach the EU’s own Art. 5 65% single-third-country ceiling (global-production proxy).

Material	Controlled by	You	Global	Band	Art. 5	Input share	Substitute	Laws	Trend
Manganese	🇨🇳 CN 90% refining	71	69	High	EXCEEDS 90%	Med	none	12	▲ rising
Silicon	🇨🇳 CN 80% refining	66	64	Elevated	EXCEEDS 80%	Med	limited	19	▲ rising
Niobium	🇧🇷 BR 89% refining	55	61	Elevated	—	Low	some	5	▲ rising
Zinc	🇨🇳 CN 32% mining	38	37	Low	—	Low	ready	7	▲ rising

You = buyer-relative score (this company's disclosed footprint vs. the controller). Global = buyer-agnostic supply risk. Substitute = ease of swapping the material out (none = locked in). Input share = the material's disclosed magnitude in the company's input basket (HIGH/MED/LOW only where a public filing quantifies it; — = unrated). Descriptive effect-size, never scored.

Art. 5 = does the global top single-country share breach the EU's own CRMA Art. 5 diversification ceiling (no more than 65% of a strategic raw material from a single third country)? A conservative global-production PROXY for the EU-import denominator — descriptive only, sits beside the score, never merged into it (— = non-strategic material). Reg. (EU) 2024/1252 Art. 5 ↗

Supply-risk factor analysis

Per-material factor scoring on a 1–5 likelihood×impact scale, mapped to the Art. 24(2)(b) risk-factor framework. The headline score above is a portfolio RAG; this matrix is the assessment — it is where two companies with the same binding chokepoint diverge.

The factor-by-factor analysisShow

Material	Geopolitical	Concentration	Price / market	Substitutability	Import reliance	Logistics · ESG · Supplier
Manganese	4	4	1	5	3	company input
Silicon	4	4	1	4	4	company input
Niobium	3	4	3	3	3	company input
Zinc	4	2	3	3	2	company input

1 = very low … 5 = very high — a standard supply-risk likelihood×impact scale (the form a competent authority expects for the Art. 24(2)(b) factor analysis, not a CRMA-numbered scale). Public-source factors are pre-filled from the engine's primary sources (USGS concentration, IPTM government actions, EU import data); the three rightmost factor categories need company / Tier-1 supplier data and are flagged as input under Art. 24(3). Hover any cell for its evidence.

Material factors (scored 4–5) — evidence

Manganese
- 4Geopolitical: 12 restrictive actions, peak severity 5, 6 in last 24mo
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 8134 (extreme); top CN 90%
- 5Substitutability: Graedel et al. 2013 PNAS Fig. 5: 96/100 (long-horizon, all major uses). Prior analyst short-run rating 0.92: USGS: no satisfactory substitute in its major steel applications
Silicon
- 4Geopolitical: 19 restrictive actions, peak severity 4, 14 in last 24mo
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 6498 (extreme); top CN 80%
- 4Substitutability: limited substitutes in electronics/electrical steel
- 4Import reliance: Eurostat Comext 2025: 63% extra-EU imports, top partner NO 47% (partner HHI 2698)
Niobium
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 7990 (extreme); top BR 89%
Zinc
- 4Geopolitical: 7 restrictive actions, peak severity 4, 3 in last 24mo

Change log

last 30 days

Every new filing and every amendment (rate change, scope change, repeal) touching this company's materials in the window above. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date.

The laws that threaten it

Restrictive government measures on this company's materials, newest first — each links to its primary government source.

The full list of lawsShow

🇮🇳 India Ministry of Mines launches first offshore mineral block auction (Andaman Sea)New since 2026-09-06
2026-09-30· industrial-policy· severity 2· cobalt, nickel, manganese, copper
🇺🇸 US BIS temporary final rule restricting polysilicon stockpiling ahead of Proclamation 11052 Section 232 tariffs and minimum import pricesNew since 2026-09-06
2026-09-22· regulatory· severity 3· polysilicon, silicon
🇨🇳 China MOFCOM Preliminary Anti-Dumping Ruling on Japanese Dichlorosilane (DCS) ImportsNew since 2026-09-06
2026-09-07· tariff· severity 4· silicon
🇺🇸 US Commerce continues antidumping duty orders (Bosnia, Iceland, Malaysia) and countervailing duty order (Kazakhstan) on silicon metal after five-year sunset review
2026-09-03· tariff· severity 3· silicon-metal
🇪🇺 EU opens interim review of anti-dumping duties on silicon metal from China
2026-09-01· tariff· severity 2· silicon-metal
🇺🇸 BIS DPAS Directive Allocation Order — 100% domestic-sale mandate for black mass and tungsten waste/scrap
2026-08-06· export-control· severity 4· lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese
🇺🇸 US USTR Section 301 Determination — Proposed 25% Tariff on All Brazilian Goods
2026-06-04· tariff· severity 3· niobium, copper, iron-ore
🇺🇸 US USTR Section 301 Forced Labor Findings and Proposed Action — 60 Economies
2026-06-02· tariff· severity 3· cotton, polysilicon, cobalt, lithium
🇪🇬 Egypt PM Decree No. 1440/2026 — Executive Regulations of Mineral Resources Law 198/2014
2026-04-29· regulatory· severity 3· gold, phosphate, tantalum, copper
🇺🇸 US Commerce Preliminary Antidumping Determinations — Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from India, Indonesia, and Laos
2026-04-23· tariff· severity 4· polysilicon
🇺🇸 US Commerce Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determinations — Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from India, Indonesia, and Laos
2026-02-26· tariff· severity 4· polysilicon
🇺🇸 US DOI / USGS Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals — 60-mineral statutory designation under the Energy Act of 2020
2025-11-06· regulatory· severity 3· copper, silicon, uranium, phosphate
🇲🇼 Malawi Presidential Executive Order — Prohibition on Export of Raw Unprocessed Minerals (October 2025)
2025-10-21· export-control· severity 3· rutile, uranium, rare-earth-elements, niobium
🇧🇷 Brazil Resolução Gecex nº 799/2025 — Tariff-Rate Quotas for Ten Products Including Electrolytic Manganese and Titanium Dioxide
2025-10-10· tariff· severity 2· manganese, titanium
🇮🇳 India DGFT Notification 31/2025-26 — SCOMET Category 7 emerging-technologies export controls
2025-09-23· export-control· severity 4· silicon, germanium

+ 25 more in the register.

Art. 24(2)(c) · vulnerability to disruption

Stress test — two plausible scenarios

The Art. 24(2)(c) vulnerability assessment, made explicit. For each leading exposure we model the move in this company's buyer-relative score under two distinct supply-disruption scenarios — the production footprint held fixed, only one lever moved at a time so each delta isolates one shock:

Both stress-test scenariosShow

Policy shock — the controlling country escalates to a full export-licensing / ban regime.
Concentration shock — the supply structure collapses to a single source (second-source loss / full monopoly).

Type	Scenario	Today	Stressed	Δ
Policy	Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN escalates manganese controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	71	77	+6
Concentration	Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for manganese — the second source is lost (full 90%+ monopoly)	71	78	+7
Policy	Silicon — 🇨🇳 CN escalates silicon controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	66	70	+4
Concentration	Silicon — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for silicon — the second source is lost (full 80%+ monopoly)	66	79	+13
Policy	Niobium — 🇧🇷 BR escalates niobium controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	55	63	+8
Concentration	Niobium — 🇧🇷 BR becomes the single source for niobium — the second source is lost (full 89%+ monopoly)	55	61	+6

A zero delta means that lever is already modelled at maximum on that material — today's score already prices it in. This is why the two scenarios are shown together: where a material's policy lever is already maxed (zero policy delta), the concentration shock still carries a real delta, and vice-versa. Each stressed score isolates its one lever; all other factors are held at current values.

Art. 24(4) · mitigation trigger

Significant-vulnerability conclusion

This assessment identifies 1 significant vulnerability — Manganese — each a High/Critical exposure that is hard to substitute and already under at least one in-force restrictive measure. This engages the duty under Art. 24(4) to take mitigating efforts, including assessing diversification of the supply chain or substitution of the material (see Priority mitigations below).

Stated threshold (so the conclusion is reproducible and auditable): buyer-relative band ≥ High AND substitutability hard/none AND ≥ 1 in-force restrictive measure on the material, assessed over the materials this company buys. The CRMA does not fix a numeric definition of “significant”; the company may adopt a stricter or looser threshold and should record it here.

Proposed — not yet law

Upcoming regulatory threats

Proposed, announced or draft regulation that is not yet in force but would touch this company's at-risk materials if it passes. Forward-looking early-warning — the likelihood shown is an honest band derived from the legislative stage, not a forecast or a fabricated probability. Kept separate from the enacted register above: nothing here is law yet.

The upcoming threatsShow

African Union — African Union / AfDB — continental harmonisation of mining legislation toward a ban on unprocessed critical-mineral ore exports (Abidjan Ministerial Forum outcome)
announced→low likelihood·flagged 67d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — On 10 July 2026 the African Development Bank Group, with the African Union Commission, the AfCFTA Secretariat and UNECA, convened African ministers of mining/energy/industry in Abidjan for the "Ministerial Forum on Critical Minerals Value Chain and Beneficiation: Pathways for African Transformation". The stated ambition is continental: move the bloc off raw-ore exports toward regional value chains and in-country processing, with reporting of a push to HARMONISE African mining legislation by end-2026 around a ban on unprocessed ore exports, alongside a headline mobilisation figure of ~USD 63bn for critical-minerals value-chain investment. Why this matters as axis-2 early warning rather than noise: the register already holds a dense cluster of INDIVIDUAL national instruments moving in exactly this direction — Zimbabwe's 2026-02-25 indefinite raw-mineral/lithium-concentrate export suspension, Guinea's 2026-06-19 raw-gold export ban + domestic-refining mandate, Gabon's announced 2029 crude-manganese export ban, Nigeria's RMRDC 30% value-addition bill, Indonesia-style downstreaming copied across the continent, and CEMAC's regional Common Mining Code (all already filed or queued). A binding AU/AfCFTA-level harmonisation instrument would convert that scattered set into a coordinated continental supply shock across cobalt, copper, bauxite, manganese and lithium simultaneously — which is a materially different exposure event from any single-country ban, because it removes the substitute-jurisdiction escape route that currently absorbs each national ban.
Caveat — DELIBERATELY likelihood=low, not moderate. com) is low-quality and was NOT relied on. AU-level harmonisation instruments historically take years and frequently stall at the model-law stage (cf. the known ecb-spf 400 pattern) to establish whether a formal Abidjan Declaration text exists and what it actually commits signatories to.
https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/high-level-ministerial-forum-critical-minerals-value-chain-and-beneficiation-pathways-african-transformation
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇹🇿 Tanzania Critical & Strategic Minerals Strategy + statutory critical/strategic minerals LIST (Ministry of Minerals, Mavunde) — beneficiation-mandate licensing instrument
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 99d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — Tanzania's Ministry of Minerals (Minister Anthony Mavunde) has FINALISED a Critical and Strategic Minerals Strategy that takes legal effect only once the Government formally approves and gazettes the official LIST of critical and strategic minerals — a distinct REGULATORY instrument (not the fiscal Finance Act). The strategy explicitly prioritises IN-COUNTRY BENEFICIATION for graphite, nickel, rare earths and lithium, and amends mineral-processing-licence conditions so that every processing licence now requires a domestic value-addition plan; it targets a 40-mineral beneficiation/local-processing scope plus technology-transfer partnership requirements. Once the list is gazetted, raw/unprocessed exports of the listed minerals (Tanzania = a structural graphite chokepoint via Faru/Lindi/Mahenge graphite, plus emerging niobium at Panda Hill and nickel at Kabanga) face value-addition-plan gating and likely export conditionality — re-pricing a major non-China graphite supply node and the Kabanga nickel/Panda Hill niobium projects.
Caveat — 196 levy) — those are FISCAL provisions under the Finance Act; THIS is the regulatory beneficiation-LIST instrument under the Mining Act framework (the official critical/strategic minerals designation that triggers value-addition-plan licensing). Also distinct from filed 2024-11-05-tanzania-written-laws-no-4-2024-mining-act-critical-minerals (that introduced the critical-minerals legal category; this is the operative STRATEGY + LIST that activates the beneficiation-mandate machinery) and from filed 2026-04-15-tanzania-mavunde-40-mineral-licences-revocation. Still in consultation, list not yet gazetted → moderate likelihood; severity 3 expected if the list+value-addition mandate is enacted (export conditionality on graphite/REE/lithium/nickel), severity 2 if it lands as a non-binding strategy only.
https://www.madini.go.tz/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇧🇷 Brazil PNMCE — Política Nacional de Minerais Críticos e Estratégicos (PL 2780/2024)
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 109d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium, Manganese
If passed — First federal statutory framework for critical and strategic minerals; establishes CMCE oversight committee, R$2B Mineral Activity Guarantee Fund (0. 2% gross revenue levy on critical-mineral companies), mandatory 0. 3% gross revenue R&D investment, 20% tax credits for domestic mineral transformation projects; limits raw-mineral exports where domestic processing capacity exists; covers niobium explicitly (CBMM/CMOC supply ~85% of global niobium — Brazil is a structural chokepoint); Chamber passed 343-97 on 7 May 2026, Senate review pending
Caveat — Consolidates 14 prior legislative proposals. Key contested provision: CMCE review/veto power over exports — mining lobby opposed, may resurface in Senate. Distinct from filed 2024-01-22-brazil-nova-industria-brasil-nib, 2024-09-11-brazil-brasil-semicon-program, 2024-08-02-brazil-lei-14948-low-carbon-hydrogen-framework, 2025-04-11-brazil-lei-15122-economic-reciprocity-law. First action to explicitly frame niobium as a strategic supply-chain anchor.
https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2447259
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇬🇦 Gabon — Government Announcement: Ban on Crude Manganese Ore Exports from January 1, 2029
announced→low likelihood·flagged 109d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Gabon = ~25% world manganese reserves, world's 2nd largest manganese ore exporter (~8 Mt/year via COMILOG/Eramet); ban on raw ore exports forces domestic processing investment (silicomanganese, EMD, battery-grade HPMSM) or cessation of shipments; reprices global manganese ore supply for steel alloy and NMC/LMFP battery cathode precursor markets; Eramet (dominant operator through COMILOG subsidiary and Setrag railway) confirmed impact; 3-year transition period gives industry until 2029
Caveat — Announced by President Brice Oligui Nguema (CTRI military transitional government, in power since August 2023 coup) in late May/June 2025; Eramet's June 2, 2025 official response at eramet. com confirms the government announcement; aligned with "Industrial Gabon 2035" strategy; no formal gazette decree text found as of June 2026. GA has 0 prior actions in IPTM register. Secondary source: https://www. eramet. com/en/news/eramets-response-to-the-gabonese-governments-an-nouncement-on-crude-manganese-export-ban-starting-in-2029/
https://www.africanews.com/2025/06/01/gabon-to-halt-manganese-exports-by-2029/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇪🇺 EU CRMA Strategic Projects — Second Designation Round
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 113d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese, Silicon
If passed — Second wave of CRMA Art. 14 strategic projects (drawn from 160+ applications: 95 EU-domestic + 66 third-country including 40 from strategic-partnership countries) gains fast-track permitting (27-month EU cap, 15-month Member State cap), EIB/EBRD financing-hub priority, and off-taker certainty; 75 battery-value-chain projects + 21 REE-for-permanent-magnets in pool; widens the EU's 2030 extraction/processing benchmarks pipeline beyond the first 60 projects
Caveat — Second call for applications closed January 15, 2026 (September 2025 launch). Commission stated ~4-month assessment period → designation expected May–June 2026. As of 2026-06-15, no Commission press release or OJ publication confirmed. EUR-Lex CELEX 32026D0923 verified via web search to be an unrelated EU animal-disease implementing decision. Moved from filing. md 2026-06-15. Distinct from: 2025-03-25-eu-crma-strategic-projects-first-designation (60 projects, first round) and 2024-05-23-eu-crma-entry-into-force (base regulation). Severity 3 expected (same as first-round designation).
https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/news/strategic-projects-critical-raw-materials-gain-momentum-second-selection-round-potential-funding-and-2026-01-19_en
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
🇨🇩 DRC Strategic Mineral Reclassification Decree — 6 new minerals (lithium, tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, REEs) elevated to strategic tier, royalty 3.5%→10%
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — Royalty near-triples on Manono lithium project (Zijin Mining/La Cominière, DRC's first industrial lithium mine commissioning June 2026) and all DRC tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, REE operators; reprices extraction economics across the entire DRC critical-mineral portfolio
Caveat — Council of Ministers adoption confirmed late May 2026 (Bloomberg May 31 2026: "Congo Triples Royalty Rate on Lithium With New Strategic Minerals Decree"; Zoom Eco June 1: "6 nouveaux minerais rejoignent la liste des substances stratégiques"; Jeune Afrique confirmed). Modifies décret n°18/042 of 24 November 2018. DRC gov websites unreachable as of 2026-06-14: mines. gouv. cd times out, gouvernement. cd times out, jocc. cd ENOTFOUND, primature. gouv. cd only shows 2020 content — formal text not yet accessible online. Moved from filing. md 2026-06-14. Secondary: https://africa. com/drc-moves-to-tax-lithium-as-a-strategic-mineral/
https://www.mining.com/web/congo-adds-lithium-to-strategic-minerals-in-higher-tax-bracket
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇳🇦 Namibia new Minerals Bill (Minerals Prospecting and Mining Act overhaul)
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — 10% free-carried state equity in ALL new mining and energy projects (no-cost government stake via Epangelo Mining); consultations on 51% Namibian ownership in new mining ventures; maximum royalty rate rise from 5% to potentially 10% for strategic minerals; introduction of profit-based windfall-tax mechanism; tighter local-content and environmental obligations; affects Uranium One/NamCor (uranium), Osino Resources, B2Gold, and lithium juniors in Namibia
Caveat — Reforms the 1992 Minerals (Prospecting and Mining) Act — the foundational mining law since independence. MME announced that Government is also consulting on mechanisms to promote 51% Namibian ownership in new ventures (more aggressive than the 10% headline). The Extractor Magazine (July 17, 2025) and Veridicor (Sep 16, 2025) also confirm reform scope. Distinct from already-filed NA actions: 2023-06-06 Cabinet export ban on unprocessed critical minerals; 2024-12-04 National Upstream Petroleum Local Content Policy; 2025-09-23 Nuclear Industry Strategy. The 2025 Nuclear Strategy covers uranium value-chain capture but not the broader Minerals Act reform. Namibia is the 3rd-largest uranium producer globally (Rössing, Husab) and an emerging lithium jurisdiction.
https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2025/Sectors/Mining-Minerals/mining-and-minerals-alert-2-september-developments-in-namibias-mining-law-underway
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇳🇬 Nigeria RMRDC 30% Value Addition Bill — mandatory 30% local processing of ALL raw materials before export
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — Prohibits raw mineral exports unless 30% value-addition achieved domestically; affects Chinese mining companies (dominant in Nigerian critical minerals sector), Western offtake agreements, and all foreign-invested mining JVs; builds on existing eMC+ digital cadastre and mandatory value-addition plans introduced Nov 2024; could force processing-plant investment or suspension of raw mineral shipments from Africa's most populous economy; RMRDC = Raw Materials Research and Development Council (the sponsoring agency)
Caveat — Bill passed third reading in House of Representatives; multiple Nov 2025 sources confirm both chambers approved; as of 2026-06-14 presidential signature not yet confirmed. Distinct from filed Nigeria Tax Reform Acts 2025 (Loi n°1/19 tax restructuring) and Mining Cadastral licence revocations (2025-06-19). Applies to ALL raw materials, not minerals only — IPTM relevance is the mineral export provisions.
https://www.nationalaccordnewspaper.com/turning-point-for-nigeria-as-rmrdcs-30-value-addition-bill-nears-presidential-assent/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇵🇪 Peru Ley General de Minería Amendment — Mining Concession Regime Reform
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — Reduces maximum idle-concession period from 30 to 15 years (initial production deadline unchanged at 10 yr; penalty extension cut from 20 yr to just 5 yr); eliminates irrevocable legal status of mining concessions for first time in Peruvian law history, making concessions revocable by administrative authority; introduces higher annual fees and stronger production/investment requirements; threatens legal certainty for Peru's undeveloped copper and silver project pipeline — Peru = #2 copper, #4 silver, #1 lead, #2 zinc globally
Caveat — Approved by Energy and Mining Commission March 17, 2026 by 11 votes to 1 with 3 abstentions — driven by left-aligned Juntos por el Perú (JPP) and Podemos Peru majority. Bill also introduces "comuneros como accionistas" (community shareholders) in mining concessions — first legislative insertion of indigenous community equity rights. MINEM, SNMPE, ComexPerú, and Ingemmet publicly opposed; MINEM warns reform would incentivise illegal mining expansion. Full plenary debate pending as of June 2026. Distinct from all filed PE actions (all executive/regulatory decrees — no prior legislative amendment to Ley General de Minería in register). Also distinct from filed PE actions on REINFO extension (2025-12-26), illegal-mining criminalization (2026-01-20), and Tía María revocation (2026-03-19).
https://elcomercio.pe/economia/peru/comision-de-energia-aprueba-cambios-en-la-ley-de-mineria-y-reaviva-alertas-por-impacto-en-inversion-y-estabilidad-juridica-noticia/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇪🇺 EU CRMA Art. 22 Commission Implementing Decision — Strategic Raw Material Stock Benchmarks
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 113d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese, Silicon, Niobium
If passed — Establishes the first legally binding "safe level" benchmark for EU strategic stocks of each of the 17 strategic raw materials listed in the CRMA Annex I; benchmarks used as reference by Member States, financial institutions, and industrial consumers to assess strategic supply risk; mandated every 2 years, so this is the first edition setting the baseline; informs CRMA Art. 23 monitoring obligations and is the evidential basis for Art. 24 corporate-reporting thresholds
Caveat — The May 24, 2026 deadline set by Parliament and Council in Reg. (EU) 2024/1252 has now passed. No OJ publication confirmed as of June 15, 2026 — Commission may have adopted quietly or is overdue. This is the first CRMA Art. 22 benchmark cycle and is legally distinct from: (1) the CRMA base regulation (filed 2024-05-23); (2) the Strategic Projects first designation (filed 2025-03-25); (3) the RESourceEU Amendment — CRMA revision (filed 2026-03-04). If confirmed adopted, severity=2 (establishes the measurement baseline for EU strategic material supply risk assessment and directly feeds corporate Art. 24 reporting obligations). Distinct from all filed EU-CRMA actions. Not in filing. md or upcoming. md.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj/eng
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇬🇭 Ghana Minerals and Mining Act overhaul (Act 703 replacement) + new National Mining Policy
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 111d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Cabinet-cleared bill to replace the 2006 Minerals and Mining Act, Act 703: raises mining royalties from current 3–5% range to 9–12% (price-linked sliding scale), introduces a new medium-scale mining licence category bridging artisanal and large-scale operations, mandates district-level community and traditional-authority consultation before applications reach national regulators, scraps unlimited concession renewals (currently indefinitely renewable), and strengthens Ghanaian ownership provisions; National Mining Policy approved by Cabinet simultaneously; affects Newmont (Ahafo/Akyem), AngloGold Ashanti, Kinross (Chirano), Gold Fields (Tarkwa, post-Damang reversion), and Atlantic Lithium (Ewoyaa lithium project); royalty more than doubles at current gold prices — material cost increase for large-scale operators
Caveat — Distinct from all 6 filed GH actions: distinct from 2025-12-19-ghana-minerals-mining-royalty-regulations-2025 (those set sliding royalty under existing Act 703 — this bill replaces Act 703 entirely and raises the ceiling well beyond current regulations); distinct from 2026-03-13-ghana-growth-sustainability-levy-amendment (profit-based tax, not royalty); distinct from 2026-03-19-ghana-atlantic-lithium-ewoyaa-mining-lease and 2026-04-07-ghana-damang-engineers-planners-lease (specific lease grants, not legislation). The Green Minerals Policy (cabinet-approved July 2023, banning raw mineral exports) has not been separately enacted as of June 2026 — if the new Mining Act incorporates its provisions, that becomes the first statutory export restriction for Ghana's lithium and critical minerals. Filed upcoming 2026-06-17.
https://gna.org.gh/2026/06/govt-hints-scrapping-unlimited-years-of-mining-concession-renewals/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇧🇴 Bolivia nueva Ley de Minería — comprehensive replacement of the 2014 Ley 535 de Minería y Metalurgia
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 111d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — New general mining law (distinct from PL-157 lithium/evaporites bill already in index): 20-year tax stability regime for mining projects; eliminates the 12. 5% impuesto adicional IUE-RM on extraordinary commodity-price gains; retains 25% company profits tax (IUE) and 5% royalty; streamlines licensing from current 9–15 years to international norms; enables association contracts between private companies and cooperatives; coordinated with a forthcoming general investment law incorporating fiscal and non-fiscal incentives; framed around reversing 15+ years of investment drought; backing from World Bank; bill to be presented to Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional after Mining Summit (May 18–20, 2026); target: executive submission late July 2026
Caveat — Distinct from 2026-02-01-bolivia-pl-157-recursos-evaporiticos (lithium-only evaporitícos bill; this is the general mining law replacing Ley 535 for ALL mineral sectors) and 2025-12-17-bolivia-ds-5503-economic-emergency (fuel subsidies/fiscal package). Bolivia = world's 7th-largest tin producer and holds the world's largest known lithium resources; the Paz government reform is the most significant pro-investment mining signal since the 2014 Ley 535. Likelihood moderate — new government with World Bank backing but legislative timeline uncertain; Bolivia protests history (2026 protests wiki) creates social-risk overlay. Filed upcoming 2026-06-17.
https://www.mineria.gob.bo/index.php/nota_prensa/bolivia-activa-reforma-minera-integral-y-sale-a-captar-inversiones-con-respaldo-del-banco-mundial/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇺🇸 USTR Plurilateral Agreement on Trade in Critical Minerals
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 110d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Binding plurilateral trade agreement among like-minded partners (US, EU, Japan and FORGE coalition members) establishing coordinated trade measures for critical mineral supply chains — including border-adjusted price floors, standards-based market access conditions, price-gap subsidies, and off-take agreement frameworks — to counter non-market pricing from state-backed producers and reduce concentrated supply-chain dependency; would create the first binding multilateral trade-law instrument specifically governing critical minerals flows, operating parallel to and distinct from the WTO goods schedule
Caveat — Distinct from FORGE (Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement, already filed as 2026-02-04-us-forge-critical-minerals-coalition — a diplomatic coordination platform, not a binding trade instrument); distinct from the filed bilateral action plans (US-Mexico 2026-02-04, US-Japan 2026-03-19, US-EU 2026-04-24 — these are bilateral work programmes, not the binding multilateral trade agreement being designed). Public comment period launched February 5, 2026; partners in scope include FORGE member states + EU. If finalised, this would be the highest-severity IPTM action in the register — creates a binding legal framework reshaping the economics of critical mineral trade globally. Context: companion to the US-EU-Japan joint statement of February 4, 2026 which directed the three parties to "develop Action Plans and explore a plurilateral trade initiative with like-minded partners on trade in critical minerals, which could include exploring the development of coordinated trade policies and mechanisms, such as border-adjusted price floors. "
Reference-class base rate
Bills at introduction (pre-committee) in US historically become law ~5% of the time (n=37,132, GovTrack — 117th–118th Congresses) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/february/ustr-seeks-public-comment-design-plurilateral-agreement-trade-critical-minerals-and-policy-actions
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
CEMAC Common Mining Code — 6-member regional harmonisation (April 2026)
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 108d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — If adopted, creates a unified mining regulatory framework across Cameroon, CAR, Congo-Brazzaville, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Chad — harmonising licensing regimes, fiscal terms, transparency obligations (EITI, KP, ICGLR), and environmental standards; would affect Eramet/Comilog manganese operations (Gabon), Sundance Resources iron ore (CAR), Chinese mining JVs (Congo-Brazzaville, CAR), and uranium projects across the region; if enacted, creates a regional investment-guarantee architecture that could facilitate cross-border mining finance and reduce individual-country treaty risk; structural precedent for pooled resource sovereignty in a region where individual states are renegotiating contracts (Gabon post-coup Décret 0276/2024 sovereign-equity mandate, CAR post-KP-readmission, Congo-Brazzaville mining-code review)
Caveat — Consultation meetings held April 2024 (Brazzaville), July 2024 (Riaba/Malabo), February 2025 (regional review workshop), April 2026 (Douala finalization session) — code still in draft form as of April-May 2026; CEMAC has a historically slow ratification track record (Tariff Union took ~15 years to operationalise); likelihood low until formal adoption at heads-of-state summit; DISTINCT from individually filed national mining code reforms: Gabon Décret 0276/2024 (sovereign substances regime), CAR Law 24-008 (new mining code). Filed upcoming 2026-06-20.
https://www.financialafrik.com/en/2026/04/24/cemac-a-common-mining-code-as-a-lever-for-regional-investment/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇹🇿 Tanzania Finance Bill 2026/27 — Parliament-passed June 23, 2026; mining: Mineral Research Fund (10% gross mineral revenue), Income Tax Act & VAT Framework Agreement exemptions
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — TZ Finance Bill establishes the Mineral Research Fund capitalised at 10% of gross mineral revenue (~TZS 141 billion/yr at 2025 collection levels); amends the Income Tax Act to formally recognise tax exemptions granted under individual mining Framework Agreements and introduces standard operating procedures — reduces discretionary government risk for large mining investors (Panda Hill niobium, graphite juniors, Buzwagi gold); parallel VAT amendments give equivalent statutory certainty for VAT exemptions; taken together, the bill moves Tanzania from discretionary tax administration toward a rule-of-law-based investor regime for all critical-mineral projects; budget targets Tanzania for top-4 niobium producer status (Panda Hill DA already signed March 24, 2026) and 50% geophysical survey coverage by 2030
Caveat — Tanzania fiscal year starts July 1; the Finance Act signature typically occurs last week of June. Budget speech delivered June 11, 2026 by Finance Minister Khamis Mussa Omar; Parliament approved June 23. Mining provisions in §§ amending Income Tax Act (Cap. 332) and VAT Act (Cap. 148) and establishing the Mineral Research Fund. Distinct from: filed 2025-06-30-tanzania-finance-act-11-of-2025 (prior year), filed 2026-03-24-tanzania-panda-hill-niobium-ferroniobium-development-agreement (the specific project DA), and filed 2026-04-15-tanzania-ministry-of-minerals-revokes-40-idle-mineral-exploration-licences. Severity 2: institutional reform that de-risks the investor regime rather than a direct trade restriction.
https://www.tanzaniainvest.com/economy/budget-2026-2027-parliament-approved
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇹🇿 Tanzania Finance Bill 2026/27 — NEW raw-mineral EXPORT LEVY on quartz (HS 25.06) and feldspar (HS 2529.10.00) under the Export Tax Act, Cap. 196
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 100d ago · not yet law·matches Silicon
If passed — The same Finance Bill 2026/27 already tabled (Parliament-passed 23 June 2026, effective 1 July 2026) inserts a NEW export levy of "10% of the FOB value of the cargo OR TZS 200 per kilogram, whichever is higher" on exports of quartz minerals (HS 25. 06) and feldspar (HS 2529. 10. 00) via amendment to the Export Tax Act, Cap. 196 — a distinct beneficiation-forcing EXPORT-TAX instrument that pushes raw quartz/feldspar exporters toward in-country value-addition. 196), and neither existing entry mentions it; (2) material-relevant — quartz HS 25. 06 covers high-purity/silica quartz feeding the silicon→semiconductor/solar value chain, so a Tanzanian export tax re-prices a raw-silica supply node; the same "rocks to riches" beneficiation logic Tanzania applies elsewhere; (3) part of the wider African raw-mineral-export-tax wave (cf. Zimbabwe 10% lithium-concentrate levy, Namibia unprocessed-mineral ban, Guinea bauxite reference price).
Caveat — On enactment, fold into that one TZ Finance Act 2026 action with action_type capturing both the fiscal-incentive and the export-levy (export-control/tariff) provisions; do NOT double-file. Distinct from filed 2025-06-30-tanzania-finance-act-11-of-2025 (prior year — no quartz/feldspar export levy). Severity 2 (sectoral raw-mineral export tax, niche HS lines).
https://polis.bunge.go.tz/uploads/bills/1781852249-Muswada_wa_Sheriia_ya_Fedha_wa_Mwaka_2026_(The_Finance_Bill,_2026).pdf
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
🇺🇸 US BOEM Proposed Rule — Administrative Revisions to OCS Hard Minerals Regulations (FR Doc. 2026-03690)
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 105d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Revises 30 CFR Part 580 to streamline 10 provisions governing prospecting, leasing, and operations for hard minerals (manganese nodules, cobalt-rich crusts, seafloor massive sulfides) on the US Outer Continental Shelf; eliminates environmental notification to adjacent state governors (§580. 31) and BOEM's own environmental review requirement (§580. 29); accelerates OCS hard mineral leasing pipeline in line with EOs 14285 and 14154 ("unleashing" OCS resources); comment period closed April 27, 2026; awaiting final rule
Caveat — First substantive revision of US OCS hard minerals regulatory framework in ~35 years; distinct from all filed US actions (no prior OCS hard minerals action in register). Severity 2: regulatory infrastructure that enables future OCS leasing rather than a direct production/export instrument; secondary-boem: https://www. boem. gov/newsroom/press-releases/boem-proposes-rule-changes-support-critical-mineral-exploration-and
Reference-class base rate
Bills at out of committee in US historically become law ~21% of the time (n=1,687, GovTrack — 117th Congress (2021–2023)) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/24/2026-03690/administrative-revisions-to-regulations-related-to-outer-continental-shelf-minerals-other-than-oil
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇬🇦 Gabon — Government to Subscribe to Eramet €500M Capital Increase, Acquiring Equity Stake in French Parent Company
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Gabon (CTRI transitional government, President Oligui Nguema) announced at Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi (May 2026) its intention to subscribe to Eramet SA's €500M capital increase, giving the Gabonese state direct equity in the French-listed parent of COMILOG (its primary manganese mining subsidiary in Moanda). Gabon already holds 29% of COMILOG; a stake in Eramet SA itself would give Gabon leverage over the global operations of the parent group (smelting, nickel, lithium, manganese across France, Norway, Senegal, and Indonesia) and a seat at the Eramet Board. Eramet AGM (May 27, 2026) approved the capital raise resolution. Capital raise planned for H2 2026. Distinct from: filed 2025-05-30-gabon-raw-manganese-export-ban-2029 (the export ban forcing value-addition); filed 2024-07-02-gabon-decret-0276-regimes-des-substances-souveraines (35% state free-carry in new mines) — this is an equity purchase in the parent company, not a free-carry in a Gabonese concession; new vector of state resource-control
Caveat — Eramet capital raise planned for H2 2026; no decree number or gazette reference from Gabon available as of June 26, 2026. Gabon's National Strategic Investment Fund (FONSIG) or CTRI Council of Ministers would be the authorising body. Eramet SA (Euronext Paris: ERA) is ~37% owned by French state arm BPIFRANCE as at 2025 — a Gabon stake would create a two-sovereign ownership structure over the world's second-largest manganese ore exporter. Severity 3 expected if completed: creates direct state leverage over COMILOG's pricing, capex, and processing decisions, going beyond the 2029 ore export ban.
https://www.africanews.com/2026/05/13/gabon-move-to-acquire-stake-in-international-manganese-mining-company/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇮🇳 India SASCI Mining Sector Reforms Component FY2026-27 — ₹5,000 crore incentive scheme to accelerate mine auction-to-production pipeline
announced→low likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Ministry of Mines issued operational guidelines for the Mining Sector Reforms component under Scheme for Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASCI) FY2026-27, with total ₹5,000 crore (~USD 600M) incentive envelope to states; key components: (i) ₹250 crore one-time incentive to any state where ≥10% of pre-March-2026 auctioned major mineral blocks begin production+dispatch by end-2026; (ii) ₹100 crore baseline for systemic reforms (Unified Mining Portal integration, Pre-Auction Committees); (iii) ₹20 crore per block auctioned with pre-embedded forest and environmental clearances; scheme targets removing the "auction gap" — India has auctioned hundreds of mineral blocks since 2015 MMDR amendments but operationalisation lag remains a structural bottleneck; critical minerals relevance: India is running parallel programme of critical+strategic mineral auctions (7 tranches, 56 blocks auctioned by June 24, 2026) and this scheme incentivises states to bring those blocks into production faster; directly accelerates lithium (Rajasthan), REE (Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu), graphite (Odisha), and nickel (Odisha, Jharkhand) pipelines
Caveat — Source is secondary (PolicyEdge news aggregator). To migrate to filing. md, filer must verify the primary notification on mines. gov. in or pib. gov. in (search "SASCI Mining 2026-27" on PIB search). India BHAVYA industrial parks scheme (₹33,660 crore, March 18, 2026) is separately filed — SASCI is a distinct scheme targeting state-level mining-sector governance reform. Distinct from filed India Union Budget 2026-27 Customs notifications and Semiconductor Mission 2. 0. Severity 2 (supply-side demand-unlock rather than export control or FDI gate).
https://www.policyedge.in/p/centre-launches-5000-crore-incentive-scheme-to-speed-up-mine-auctions-and-production
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇲🇳 Mongolia Minerals Law Comprehensive Amendment 2026 — ~40% of 2006 law revised; exploration-licence term cut, statutory critical-minerals definition, downstream-beneficiation licensing
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 101d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Mongolia's cabinet approved and submitted to the State Great Khural a draft amending ~40% of the 2006 Minerals Law: (i) cuts the maximum exploration-licence duration from 12 to 6 years while raising holding fees (to curb speculative licence-trading/flipping); (ii) introduces a STATUTORY definition of "critical minerals" (aligned to Mongolia's 11-mineral list: molybdenum, manganese, nickel, copper, fluorspar, graphite, REEs, cobalt, lithium, PGMs, tungsten) and a SEPARATE licensing regime for downstream beneficiation plants; (iii) mandates mine-closure plans + financial bonding once a mine reaches 75% of its life; aims to accelerate licence issuance and expand the resource base. Mongolia is a structural China/Russia-flanked chokepoint pursuing Western REE/copper partnerships (US FORGE, JP, KR), so a domestic critical-minerals statutory regime + downstream-processing licensing reprices the entry terms for any foreign developer of Mongolian copper/REE/fluorspar (Oyu Tolgoi-adjacent, Erdenes critical-minerals SOE pipeline).
Caveat — As of 2026-06-27 the bill is cabinet-approved and submitted to Parliament — NOT yet passed, hence axis-2/upcoming. Likelihood moderate: ruling-party majority favours passage but Mongolian minerals-law amendments are politically contested and frequently amended in committee. Distinct from filed 2024-04-19-mongolia-sovereign-wealth-fund-law (SWF + 34% strategic-deposit state-stake amendments), filed 2025-01-15-mongolia-critical-minerals-support-law (the separate critical-minerals PROJECT-support draft law), and filed 2025-09-05-mongolia-mpe-royalty-calculation-shift (royalty base shift to the Mining Product Exchange). Severity 3 expected if enacted.
https://mono.mn/n/government_approves_draft
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇪🇺 EU European Critical Raw Materials (CRM) Centre — establishing instrument
consultation-closed (pre-proposal; CFE + OPC both closed 2026-07-29)→elevated likelihood·flagged 68d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — RESourceEU (COM(2025) 945, 3 Dec 2025) commits the Commission to establish a **European Critical Raw Materials Centre** in early 2026 with four functions: (a) generate **systemic market intelligence on CRM value chains**; (b) steer and de-risk finance into strategic projects with public and private partners; (c) support **strategic stockpiling**; and (d) run **joint purchasing** by pooling company orders and matchmaking demand with supply (a "raw materials platform" pooling orders and creating joint stocks, with an EU-coordinated stockpiling pilot to become operational in the following year). A **call for evidence + public consultation opened 19 May 2026**, and the Commission announced a **legislative proposal for Q2 2026**. Supply-relief on the material axis (EU-side aggregation, stockpiles and de-risking finance directly loosen chokepoint exposure for EU industrial buyers), but it also creates a new EU purchasing/allocation gatekeeper whose membership and priority rules will be contested. If it carries reporting or data-submission duties on participating companies, it becomes a second corporate-facing CRM information obligation alongside CRMA Art. 24.
Caveat — europa. eu/info/law/better-regulation/brpapi/groupInitiatives/14832) serves the registry entry directly. Verified: initiative **id 14832**, ref **Ares(2025)6918424**, planning ref **PLAN/2025/1815**, lead **DG GROW**, **isMajor: true**, foreseen act **PROP_REG**; the Commission's own dossier summary names the four pillars as **joint purchasing, stockpiling, investments, and raw materials intelligence**. (1) The **19 May 2026 launch IS confirmed** — both consultation publications carry publishedDate 2026/05/19; the call for evidence (CFE_IMPACT_ASSESS, titled "Legislative proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the EU Critical Raw Materials Centre") and the open public consultation (OPC_LAUNCHED) each ran a 10-week window that **CLOSED 2026-07-29 23:59:59**, drawing **138** and **72** submissions respectively. (2) The **Q2-2026 slip is confirmed, not a fetch artefact** — the PROP_REG publication still carries plannedPeriod "Q-2026-2" (2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30) with initiativeStatus **UPCOMING**, and a EUR-Lex check on 2026-07-31 finds no COM(2026) text establishing the Centre: ~31 days overdue by the Commission's own planning record, neither folded into another instrument nor silently adopted. **Legal form now known: a Regulation of the EP and Council** → full ordinary legislative procedure after the proposal lands, so an operational Centre is a 2027+ event. Cheapest future check: re-poll the same API endpoint and watch for the PROP_REG publication flipping to published. Distinct from filed 2025-12-03-eu-resourceeu-action-plan-com-2025-945 (the umbrella action plan announcing the intent — this item tracks the specific instrument establishing the Centre), from the CRMA base regulation (filed 2024-05-23), from the CRMA Art. 22 strategic-stock benchmarks item (line 103 above — that is a benchmark-setting implementing measure, this is an institution-creating instrument), and from the permanent-magnet scrap export restriction (line 141 above). ALSO a competitive-positioning item, not only a register item: a publicly-funded EU body with a statutory CRM market-intelligence remit is the most credible free substitute for our minerals intelligence layer — see the 2026-07-30 entry in docs/strategy/mandate_triggers_watch. md ("Demand-narrative signals").
https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/01c448d6-dc93-40d7-9afe-4c2af448d00c_en
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇲🇼 Malawi — Presidential Executive Order banning export of all raw/unprocessed minerals (effective 21 Oct 2025)
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 54d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — President Peter Mutharika signed an executive order (dated 23 Oct 2025, effective 21 Oct 2025, announced at Sanjika Palace during a cabinet swearing-in) prohibiting the export of raw/unprocessed minerals extracted in Malawi — uranium, rare earth elements, niobium, graphite, tantalum, bauxite, coal, limestone, gemstones, heavy mineral sands, vermiculite, phosphate, rutile, gold, diamonds, copper and others — with an exemption for minerals processed/refined/value-added domestically per Malawian mining law. Announced alongside a suspension of new mining-licence issuance and a review of mining laws (2026/27 State of the Nation Address), plus a planned sovereign wealth fund. Stated rationale: local beneficiation, targeting up to USD 500m/yr once the Kasiya rutile/graphite deposit (Lilongwe) and Kangankunde rare-earth project (Balaka, Mkango Resources — Africa's prospective first new REE mine since 2017, targeting late-2026 production) are fully developed. Violators face fines/penalties under Malawian law. MW is currently the THINNEST country in the register (1 prior action) despite this breadth of minerals covered. Export-ban/beneficiation-mandate, same instrument class as Zimbabwe's SI 213/2022 raw-mineral bans and Guinea's 2026 gold-export ban already in the register.
Caveat — ENACTED (signed order, in force since 21 Oct 2025) but parked here rather than filing. gov. mw directly (TLS cert mismatch: cert is issued for agriculture. gov. mw, not statehouse. gov. mw) and the malawiace. com implementation-analysis piece cites no gov URL either. Same park-lot convention as the DRC ARECOMS / Sudan / Egypt / Morocco / Brazil / India lines above (real, already-enacted action; primary URL not independently locatable this wake). Dedup: action-index has only 1 Malawi action total, none overlapping (no prior MW export-ban or beneficiation-mandate action exists). Severity 3-4 expected given the breadth of minerals covered and MW's fast-growing REE/graphite production profile.
https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/business-tech/malawi-president-mutharika-bans-exports-of-raw-minerals-5247332
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇨🇮 Côte d'Ivoire — Revision of the 2014 Code Minier (Loi n° 2014-138)
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 27d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Minister of Mines, Petroleum and Energy Mamadou Sangafowa-Coulibaly formally launched the revision of Côte d'Ivoire's 2014 Mining Code on 13 June 2026, standing up an expert team drawn from his ministry, other state institutions and international bodies to rewrite Loi n° 2014-138 du 24 mars 2014. Stated goals: raise state revenue share, fix "disparate and sometimes poorly negotiated" mining conventions, and modernise the mining cadastre. No draft bill text published yet — this is a mandate/committee-formation stage, distinct from and earlier than the already-filed 2026-02-04 Assafou/Doropo gold-permit decrees and the 2025-12-03 PIRME minerals-energy policy (2025-2040), both of which operate under the CURRENT 2014 code rather than proposing to replace it. Chokepoint-relevant: register's only prior CI code-minier-lineage entries are the 2014 code itself and a 2022 local-content oil/gas law — no entry tracks this active rewrite.
Caveat — Dedup: checked action-index and both queues for "code minier"/"mining code" + CI — only hits are the already-filed 2014 code, the 2022 local-content petroleum law, and the 2024-12 gold-royalty finance law, none of which is this revision effort. Distinct from Senegal's and Morocco's already-queued mining-code amendments (different issuer/instrument).
https://www.energie.gouv.ci/actualite/sangafowa-coulibaly-veut-booster-lattractivite-du-code-minier
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6

Likelihood band is derived deterministically from the legislative stage (announced → low; draft-published / in-consultation → moderate; passed-committee → elevated; passed-vote / awaiting-signature → high) — a reproducible, source-traceable proxy, not a probability estimate. Where shown, the modelled impact-if-passed re-uses the same buyer-relative stress engine as the enacted scenarios above: it holds this company's production footprint fixed and escalates the proposed measure to a full export-licensing / control regime — the conservative upper bound for a measure that may pass only as a partial cap. The delta is the move from today's score to that stressed score; companies with no modelled production footprint show no delta.

What to watch next

Forward-looking read on the binding chokepoint, from the recent trajectory of policy on these materials. Directional, not a forecast.

The watch listShow

Manganese is the line to war-game: 🇨🇳 CN already controls 90% of refining, and the policy lever is active. A single new licensing or export-control action on this material moves the binding score materially.
Silicon carries 19 restrictive measures on record (🇨🇳 CN 80% of refining) — a secondary escalation candidate.
Niobium carries 5 restrictive measures on record (🇧🇷 BR 89% of refining) — a secondary escalation candidate.

Art. 24(4) · diversification & substitution

Priority mitigations

The mitigating efforts Art. 24(4) names — diversifying the supply chain and substituting the material — plus the standard levers against a concentrated, policy-exposed input. Prioritise around the binding input chokepoint (Manganese).

The mitigation optionsShow

Map your real exposure to Manganese. Trace it from the component back to the smelter/refiner and country of origin — most buyers discover the dependence is one tier deeper than their direct supplier.
Qualify a non-CN source. Identify and validate at least one supplier outside CN for the binding input before it is needed, even at a cost premium — optionality is the hedge.
Lead-time to re-source is ~9 months (6-12mo). The largest tracked non-CN producer of Manganese is 🇿🇦 ZA (~5% of refining); scaling it into a replacement is roughly a 6-12mo ramp. A share-of-stage substitution heuristic derived from current production share, not a firm supplier quote.
Hold strategic inventory / contract forward. For materials with no substitute and active export controls, a buffer stock or long-dated offtake converts a shock into a managed cost.
Run a live policy tripwire. Monitor MOFCOM, EU CRMA and the exporting jurisdictions for new measures on your materials, with a pre-agreed escalation if a licensing regime tightens — this register is that monitor.

Annex A · regulatory basis

CRMA Art. 24 compliance crosswalk

Under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act (Reg. (EU) 2024/1252), a Member State identifies the large companies (Art. 2(29): >500 employees and >€150M net worldwide turnover) using strategic raw materials to manufacture a listed strategic technology (batteries, renewables, hydrogen, traction motors, heat pumps, aircraft, data-storage equipment, robotics, drones, satellites, advanced chips). Those companies must, at least every three years and to the extent the information is available to them (Art. 24(2)), assess their strategic-raw-material supply chain. Where suppliers do not provide the data on request, the assessment may rely on the Commission's monitoring dashboard (Art. 20(4)) or other publicly available information (Art. 24(3)) — which is the evidence base this report assembles. Board reporting (Art. 24(5)) is voluntary unless the Member State mandates it (Art. 24(6)).

The full crosswalkShow

CRMA provision	Obligation	Where addressed
Art. 24(1)	Member State identifies the company as in-scope (uses an SRM to make a listed strategic technology).	Scope & applicability
Art. 24(2)(a)	Map where the strategic raw materials are extracted, processed and recycled.	Exposure register + Supply-risk factor analysis
Art. 24(2)(b)	Analyse the factors that might affect supply.	Supply-risk factor analysis (factor matrix) + The laws that threaten it
Art. 24(2)(c)	Assess vulnerabilities to supply disruptions.	Stress test + significant-vulnerability conclusion
Art. 24(3)	Where supplier data is unavailable, rely on Commission (Art. 20(4)) / public sources.	This report's basis — see Methodology & sources
Art. 24(4)	Where significant vulnerabilities are found, assess diversifying or substituting.	Significant-vulnerability conclusion + Priority mitigations
Art. 24(5)–(6)	Report results, sources, significant risks and mitigations to the board.	This document — board-ready, PDF-exportable

This report pre-fills the Art. 24(3) public-source half of the assessment. The company-specific inputs — employee/turnover thresholds, bill-of-materials volumes, the tiered supplier map, and formal board adoption — remain the company's to complete; they are flagged as “company input” where they appear.

Why this dependence is structural, not transitional. The EU's own external auditor — the European Court of Auditors, Special Report “Critical raw materials for the energy transition — Not a rock-solid policy” (Feb 2026) — judges the bloc's 2030 extraction, processing and recycling targets to be out of reach (recycling runs 1–5% for 7 of 26 materials, and diversification shows no measurable effect). A separate industry-analyst assessment (Adamas Intelligence & Tradium, EU CRMA report, Apr 2024 — an interested-party commercial view, not an independent verdict) reaches a compatible conclusion that the 2030 rare-earth targets will be missed without an expedited push. The chokepoint this report maps is therefore a durable constraint the Act has not yet closed, not a gap that resolves on its own.

Annex B · Art. 24(1) · Art. 2(29)

Scope & applicability

Article 24 applies only when both size thresholds are met and a Member State has identified the company as making a listed strategic technology with strategic raw materials.

Scope detailsShow

Threshold test	This assessment
Average employees (last FY) > 500	company input
Net worldwide turnover (last FY) > €150M	company input
Uses a strategic raw material as an input	Yes — 4 scored SRMs on the input side (binding: Manganese)
Manufactures a listed strategic technology	mining-metals (confirm against Annex)
Formally identified by a Member State authority	company input

Evidence & sources

Production-concentration figures: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 + the production dataset behind each material page. Policy measures trace to the primary government sources below.

All sourcesShow

Methodology

Each material's global supply-risk index blends five weighted factors: concentration of refining/processing (35%), active trade-control & policy pressure (25%), import reliance (15%), substitutability (15%), and price stress (10%). The buyer-relative score then scales the relational factors (concentration / policy / import) by this company's production-footprint alignment against each material's controlling country — bloc-neutral factors (substitutability, price) are left intact.

Caveats. The footprint is the company's assembly / manufacturing geography applied uniformly across all materials — a first-order proxy, not per-material input tracing. Scores are an analytical judgement on public data with a transparent weighting, not a market forecast or investment advice. Production shares reflect 2024-2025 figures and the policy position as of 2026-09-30; the register is continuously maintained and should be re-pulled against each new policy action.

MACROLENS · CICONIALABS · GEOPOLITICAL SUPPLY-RISK REPORT (EU CRMA ART. 20–25) · report generated 2026-10-06

Tip: the change log above defaults to the last 30 days. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date (e.g. ?since=2026-04-01).

Refresh SLA

New government measures — polled hourly; a filed action can appear on this report within the hour it's picked up.
Dossier verification (this company's exposure list, sourced against its own disclosures) — the auto-onboarded backlog drains on a 30-minute cycle; a specific company's upgrade timing depends on queue position, not a fixed date.
Live-quoted materials (currently: neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, terbium, indium, tellurium — see the price row on each material's page) — refreshed daily.
Other material prices — hand-maintained; flagged STALE on the minerals index past 45 days without a fresh source, rather than left silently out of date.

This is a description of the actual automated pipeline (verifiable against this repo's own cron schedule), not a contractual commitment.

← All companies

Geopolitical Supply-Risk Report·EU CRMA Art. 20–25 assessment·MacroLens · CiconiaLabs

JSW Steel Ltd

4 critical materials scored · binding chokepoint: Manganese (🇨🇳 CN 90% of refining) · 40 restrictive government measures on record

Subject

JSWSTEEL.BO · 🇮🇳 IN

Sector

mining-metals

Materials scored

As of

2026-09-30

Risk Office verdict

Elevated · 66/100Company supply-risk index

Competitor cohort · mining metals

JSW Steel Ltd ranks 170th of 449 verified mining metals companies, tied with 8 others at 66.

95🇺🇸 TdVibDysprosium
95🇦🇺 Northern Minerals LimitedDysprosium
93🇺🇸 Alta Resource TechnologiesDysprosium
93🇬🇧 Mkango Resources LimitedDysprosium
93🇨🇦 Defense Metals Corp.Dysprosium
93🇨🇦 Ucore Rare MetalsDysprosium
92🇺🇸 Phoenix TailingsDysprosium
91🇨🇦 Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp.Dysprosium
91🇦🇺 Arafura Rare Earths LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 Hastings Technology Metals LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 VHM LimitedDysprosium
91🇦🇺 Vital Metals LtdDysprosium
90🇨🇦 NioCorp DevelopmentsDysprosium
90🇺🇸 Energy Fuels Inc.Dysprosium
66🇮🇳 JSW Steel LtdManganese

JSW Steel Ltd

The exposure report is at /intelligence/dossiers/jsw-steel/report.

What they do

Critical-material exposure

Manganese — bulk input. JSW holds a captive manganese ore reserve

Silicon — structural component (in electrical steel, not trace). JSW

Chromium, nickel, vanadium — dropped 2026-09-26. JSW's Salem Works

Dropped from the prior sector-derived list: cobalt, copper and aluminium

Sources

JSW Steel — Special Alloy Steel product page (Salem Works, automotive/defence/bearing end-uses)
Mining Technology — JSW Steel secures Narayanposhi iron ore mine in Odisha (captive manganese ore reserve, 0.505 Mt)
Ferro-Alloys.com — JSW Steel and Japan's JFE Steel to invest $669 million (CRGO electrical steel JV, silicon exposure)

Named counterparties — who actually buys and sells

The full counterparty breakdownShow

Named suppliers (2)

Korea Zinc Company, Ltd. · 2025, per Indian import records (ImportGenius)arm's length customs secondarysource ↗
Indian import records list shipper Korea Zinc Company, Ltd. Onsan Complex (Ulsan, South Korea) and consignee JSW Steel Coated Products Limited (JSW Steel galvanizing subsidiary, Maharashtra, India), arrival 2025-05-20, 'CONTINUED GALVANIZING GRADE ZINC IN JUMBO (CGGJ)', 253.001 MTS. No value stated.
CBMM (Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração) · FY2024arm's length company-disclosure primary-sourcesource ↗
CBMM's own 2024 Sustainability Report, CEO letter: 'the recognition of our ESG efforts by three key customers in the Indian market—JSL, JSW, and Tata Steel, affirming that we are on the right path in managing our practices.' No volume or share disclosed.

The exposure register

Ranked by buyer-relative risk, highest first.

2 of 2 of your scored CRMA-strategic materials breach the EU’s own Art. 5 65% single-third-country ceiling (global-production proxy).

Material	Controlled by	You	Global	Band	Art. 5	Input share	Substitute	Laws	Trend
Manganese	🇨🇳 CN 90% refining	71	69	High	EXCEEDS 90%	Med	none	12	▲ rising
Silicon	🇨🇳 CN 80% refining	66	64	Elevated	EXCEEDS 80%	Med	limited	19	▲ rising
Niobium	🇧🇷 BR 89% refining	55	61	Elevated	—	Low	some	5	▲ rising
Zinc	🇨🇳 CN 32% mining	38	37	Low	—	Low	ready	7	▲ rising

Supply-risk factor analysis

The factor-by-factor analysisShow

Material	Geopolitical	Concentration	Price / market	Substitutability	Import reliance	Logistics · ESG · Supplier
Manganese	4	4	1	5	3	company input
Silicon	4	4	1	4	4	company input
Niobium	3	4	3	3	3	company input
Zinc	4	2	3	3	2	company input

Material factors (scored 4–5) — evidence

Manganese
- 4Geopolitical: 12 restrictive actions, peak severity 5, 6 in last 24mo
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 8134 (extreme); top CN 90%
- 5Substitutability: Graedel et al. 2013 PNAS Fig. 5: 96/100 (long-horizon, all major uses). Prior analyst short-run rating 0.92: USGS: no satisfactory substitute in its major steel applications
Silicon
- 4Geopolitical: 19 restrictive actions, peak severity 4, 14 in last 24mo
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 6498 (extreme); top CN 80%
- 4Substitutability: limited substitutes in electronics/electrical steel
- 4Import reliance: Eurostat Comext 2025: 63% extra-EU imports, top partner NO 47% (partner HHI 2698)
Niobium
- 4Concentration: refining HHI 7990 (extreme); top BR 89%
Zinc
- 4Geopolitical: 7 restrictive actions, peak severity 4, 3 in last 24mo

Change log

last 30 days

Every new filing and every amendment (rate change, scope change, repeal) touching this company's materials in the window above. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date.

The laws that threaten it

Restrictive government measures on this company's materials, newest first — each links to its primary government source.

The full list of lawsShow

🇮🇳 India Ministry of Mines launches first offshore mineral block auction (Andaman Sea)New since 2026-09-06
2026-09-30· industrial-policy· severity 2· cobalt, nickel, manganese, copper
🇺🇸 US BIS temporary final rule restricting polysilicon stockpiling ahead of Proclamation 11052 Section 232 tariffs and minimum import pricesNew since 2026-09-06
2026-09-22· regulatory· severity 3· polysilicon, silicon
🇨🇳 China MOFCOM Preliminary Anti-Dumping Ruling on Japanese Dichlorosilane (DCS) ImportsNew since 2026-09-06
2026-09-07· tariff· severity 4· silicon
🇺🇸 US Commerce continues antidumping duty orders (Bosnia, Iceland, Malaysia) and countervailing duty order (Kazakhstan) on silicon metal after five-year sunset review
2026-09-03· tariff· severity 3· silicon-metal
🇪🇺 EU opens interim review of anti-dumping duties on silicon metal from China
2026-09-01· tariff· severity 2· silicon-metal
🇺🇸 BIS DPAS Directive Allocation Order — 100% domestic-sale mandate for black mass and tungsten waste/scrap
2026-08-06· export-control· severity 4· lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese
🇺🇸 US USTR Section 301 Determination — Proposed 25% Tariff on All Brazilian Goods
2026-06-04· tariff· severity 3· niobium, copper, iron-ore
🇺🇸 US USTR Section 301 Forced Labor Findings and Proposed Action — 60 Economies
2026-06-02· tariff· severity 3· cotton, polysilicon, cobalt, lithium
🇪🇬 Egypt PM Decree No. 1440/2026 — Executive Regulations of Mineral Resources Law 198/2014
2026-04-29· regulatory· severity 3· gold, phosphate, tantalum, copper
🇺🇸 US Commerce Preliminary Antidumping Determinations — Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from India, Indonesia, and Laos
2026-04-23· tariff· severity 4· polysilicon
🇺🇸 US Commerce Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determinations — Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from India, Indonesia, and Laos
2026-02-26· tariff· severity 4· polysilicon
🇺🇸 US DOI / USGS Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals — 60-mineral statutory designation under the Energy Act of 2020
2025-11-06· regulatory· severity 3· copper, silicon, uranium, phosphate
🇲🇼 Malawi Presidential Executive Order — Prohibition on Export of Raw Unprocessed Minerals (October 2025)
2025-10-21· export-control· severity 3· rutile, uranium, rare-earth-elements, niobium
🇧🇷 Brazil Resolução Gecex nº 799/2025 — Tariff-Rate Quotas for Ten Products Including Electrolytic Manganese and Titanium Dioxide
2025-10-10· tariff· severity 2· manganese, titanium
🇮🇳 India DGFT Notification 31/2025-26 — SCOMET Category 7 emerging-technologies export controls
2025-09-23· export-control· severity 4· silicon, germanium

+ 25 more in the register.

Art. 24(2)(c) · vulnerability to disruption

Stress test — two plausible scenarios

Both stress-test scenariosShow

Policy shock — the controlling country escalates to a full export-licensing / ban regime.
Concentration shock — the supply structure collapses to a single source (second-source loss / full monopoly).

Type	Scenario	Today	Stressed	Δ
Policy	Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN escalates manganese controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	71	77	+6
Concentration	Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for manganese — the second source is lost (full 90%+ monopoly)	71	78	+7
Policy	Silicon — 🇨🇳 CN escalates silicon controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	66	70	+4
Concentration	Silicon — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for silicon — the second source is lost (full 80%+ monopoly)	66	79	+13
Policy	Niobium — 🇧🇷 BR escalates niobium controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime	55	63	+8
Concentration	Niobium — 🇧🇷 BR becomes the single source for niobium — the second source is lost (full 89%+ monopoly)	55	61	+6

Art. 24(4) · mitigation trigger

Significant-vulnerability conclusion

Proposed — not yet law

Upcoming regulatory threats

The upcoming threatsShow

African Union — African Union / AfDB — continental harmonisation of mining legislation toward a ban on unprocessed critical-mineral ore exports (Abidjan Ministerial Forum outcome)
announced→low likelihood·flagged 67d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — On 10 July 2026 the African Development Bank Group, with the African Union Commission, the AfCFTA Secretariat and UNECA, convened African ministers of mining/energy/industry in Abidjan for the "Ministerial Forum on Critical Minerals Value Chain and Beneficiation: Pathways for African Transformation". The stated ambition is continental: move the bloc off raw-ore exports toward regional value chains and in-country processing, with reporting of a push to HARMONISE African mining legislation by end-2026 around a ban on unprocessed ore exports, alongside a headline mobilisation figure of ~USD 63bn for critical-minerals value-chain investment. Why this matters as axis-2 early warning rather than noise: the register already holds a dense cluster of INDIVIDUAL national instruments moving in exactly this direction — Zimbabwe's 2026-02-25 indefinite raw-mineral/lithium-concentrate export suspension, Guinea's 2026-06-19 raw-gold export ban + domestic-refining mandate, Gabon's announced 2029 crude-manganese export ban, Nigeria's RMRDC 30% value-addition bill, Indonesia-style downstreaming copied across the continent, and CEMAC's regional Common Mining Code (all already filed or queued). A binding AU/AfCFTA-level harmonisation instrument would convert that scattered set into a coordinated continental supply shock across cobalt, copper, bauxite, manganese and lithium simultaneously — which is a materially different exposure event from any single-country ban, because it removes the substitute-jurisdiction escape route that currently absorbs each national ban.
Caveat — DELIBERATELY likelihood=low, not moderate. com) is low-quality and was NOT relied on. AU-level harmonisation instruments historically take years and frequently stall at the model-law stage (cf. the known ecb-spf 400 pattern) to establish whether a formal Abidjan Declaration text exists and what it actually commits signatories to.
https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/high-level-ministerial-forum-critical-minerals-value-chain-and-beneficiation-pathways-african-transformation
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇹🇿 Tanzania Critical & Strategic Minerals Strategy + statutory critical/strategic minerals LIST (Ministry of Minerals, Mavunde) — beneficiation-mandate licensing instrument
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 99d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — Tanzania's Ministry of Minerals (Minister Anthony Mavunde) has FINALISED a Critical and Strategic Minerals Strategy that takes legal effect only once the Government formally approves and gazettes the official LIST of critical and strategic minerals — a distinct REGULATORY instrument (not the fiscal Finance Act). The strategy explicitly prioritises IN-COUNTRY BENEFICIATION for graphite, nickel, rare earths and lithium, and amends mineral-processing-licence conditions so that every processing licence now requires a domestic value-addition plan; it targets a 40-mineral beneficiation/local-processing scope plus technology-transfer partnership requirements. Once the list is gazetted, raw/unprocessed exports of the listed minerals (Tanzania = a structural graphite chokepoint via Faru/Lindi/Mahenge graphite, plus emerging niobium at Panda Hill and nickel at Kabanga) face value-addition-plan gating and likely export conditionality — re-pricing a major non-China graphite supply node and the Kabanga nickel/Panda Hill niobium projects.
Caveat — 196 levy) — those are FISCAL provisions under the Finance Act; THIS is the regulatory beneficiation-LIST instrument under the Mining Act framework (the official critical/strategic minerals designation that triggers value-addition-plan licensing). Also distinct from filed 2024-11-05-tanzania-written-laws-no-4-2024-mining-act-critical-minerals (that introduced the critical-minerals legal category; this is the operative STRATEGY + LIST that activates the beneficiation-mandate machinery) and from filed 2026-04-15-tanzania-mavunde-40-mineral-licences-revocation. Still in consultation, list not yet gazetted → moderate likelihood; severity 3 expected if the list+value-addition mandate is enacted (export conditionality on graphite/REE/lithium/nickel), severity 2 if it lands as a non-binding strategy only.
https://www.madini.go.tz/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇧🇷 Brazil PNMCE — Política Nacional de Minerais Críticos e Estratégicos (PL 2780/2024)
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 109d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium, Manganese
If passed — First federal statutory framework for critical and strategic minerals; establishes CMCE oversight committee, R$2B Mineral Activity Guarantee Fund (0. 2% gross revenue levy on critical-mineral companies), mandatory 0. 3% gross revenue R&D investment, 20% tax credits for domestic mineral transformation projects; limits raw-mineral exports where domestic processing capacity exists; covers niobium explicitly (CBMM/CMOC supply ~85% of global niobium — Brazil is a structural chokepoint); Chamber passed 343-97 on 7 May 2026, Senate review pending
Caveat — Consolidates 14 prior legislative proposals. Key contested provision: CMCE review/veto power over exports — mining lobby opposed, may resurface in Senate. Distinct from filed 2024-01-22-brazil-nova-industria-brasil-nib, 2024-09-11-brazil-brasil-semicon-program, 2024-08-02-brazil-lei-14948-low-carbon-hydrogen-framework, 2025-04-11-brazil-lei-15122-economic-reciprocity-law. First action to explicitly frame niobium as a strategic supply-chain anchor.
https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2447259
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇬🇦 Gabon — Government Announcement: Ban on Crude Manganese Ore Exports from January 1, 2029
announced→low likelihood·flagged 109d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Gabon = ~25% world manganese reserves, world's 2nd largest manganese ore exporter (~8 Mt/year via COMILOG/Eramet); ban on raw ore exports forces domestic processing investment (silicomanganese, EMD, battery-grade HPMSM) or cessation of shipments; reprices global manganese ore supply for steel alloy and NMC/LMFP battery cathode precursor markets; Eramet (dominant operator through COMILOG subsidiary and Setrag railway) confirmed impact; 3-year transition period gives industry until 2029
Caveat — Announced by President Brice Oligui Nguema (CTRI military transitional government, in power since August 2023 coup) in late May/June 2025; Eramet's June 2, 2025 official response at eramet. com confirms the government announcement; aligned with "Industrial Gabon 2035" strategy; no formal gazette decree text found as of June 2026. GA has 0 prior actions in IPTM register. Secondary source: https://www. eramet. com/en/news/eramets-response-to-the-gabonese-governments-an-nouncement-on-crude-manganese-export-ban-starting-in-2029/
https://www.africanews.com/2025/06/01/gabon-to-halt-manganese-exports-by-2029/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇪🇺 EU CRMA Strategic Projects — Second Designation Round
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 113d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese, Silicon
If passed — Second wave of CRMA Art. 14 strategic projects (drawn from 160+ applications: 95 EU-domestic + 66 third-country including 40 from strategic-partnership countries) gains fast-track permitting (27-month EU cap, 15-month Member State cap), EIB/EBRD financing-hub priority, and off-taker certainty; 75 battery-value-chain projects + 21 REE-for-permanent-magnets in pool; widens the EU's 2030 extraction/processing benchmarks pipeline beyond the first 60 projects
Caveat — Second call for applications closed January 15, 2026 (September 2025 launch). Commission stated ~4-month assessment period → designation expected May–June 2026. As of 2026-06-15, no Commission press release or OJ publication confirmed. EUR-Lex CELEX 32026D0923 verified via web search to be an unrelated EU animal-disease implementing decision. Moved from filing. md 2026-06-15. Distinct from: 2025-03-25-eu-crma-strategic-projects-first-designation (60 projects, first round) and 2024-05-23-eu-crma-entry-into-force (base regulation). Severity 3 expected (same as first-round designation).
https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/news/strategic-projects-critical-raw-materials-gain-momentum-second-selection-round-potential-funding-and-2026-01-19_en
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
🇨🇩 DRC Strategic Mineral Reclassification Decree — 6 new minerals (lithium, tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, REEs) elevated to strategic tier, royalty 3.5%→10%
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — Royalty near-triples on Manono lithium project (Zijin Mining/La Cominière, DRC's first industrial lithium mine commissioning June 2026) and all DRC tantalum, niobium, tungsten, uranium, REE operators; reprices extraction economics across the entire DRC critical-mineral portfolio
Caveat — Council of Ministers adoption confirmed late May 2026 (Bloomberg May 31 2026: "Congo Triples Royalty Rate on Lithium With New Strategic Minerals Decree"; Zoom Eco June 1: "6 nouveaux minerais rejoignent la liste des substances stratégiques"; Jeune Afrique confirmed). Modifies décret n°18/042 of 24 November 2018. DRC gov websites unreachable as of 2026-06-14: mines. gouv. cd times out, gouvernement. cd times out, jocc. cd ENOTFOUND, primature. gouv. cd only shows 2020 content — formal text not yet accessible online. Moved from filing. md 2026-06-14. Secondary: https://africa. com/drc-moves-to-tax-lithium-as-a-strategic-mineral/
https://www.mining.com/web/congo-adds-lithium-to-strategic-minerals-in-higher-tax-bracket
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇳🇦 Namibia new Minerals Bill (Minerals Prospecting and Mining Act overhaul)
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — 10% free-carried state equity in ALL new mining and energy projects (no-cost government stake via Epangelo Mining); consultations on 51% Namibian ownership in new mining ventures; maximum royalty rate rise from 5% to potentially 10% for strategic minerals; introduction of profit-based windfall-tax mechanism; tighter local-content and environmental obligations; affects Uranium One/NamCor (uranium), Osino Resources, B2Gold, and lithium juniors in Namibia
Caveat — Reforms the 1992 Minerals (Prospecting and Mining) Act — the foundational mining law since independence. MME announced that Government is also consulting on mechanisms to promote 51% Namibian ownership in new ventures (more aggressive than the 10% headline). The Extractor Magazine (July 17, 2025) and Veridicor (Sep 16, 2025) also confirm reform scope. Distinct from already-filed NA actions: 2023-06-06 Cabinet export ban on unprocessed critical minerals; 2024-12-04 National Upstream Petroleum Local Content Policy; 2025-09-23 Nuclear Industry Strategy. The 2025 Nuclear Strategy covers uranium value-chain capture but not the broader Minerals Act reform. Namibia is the 3rd-largest uranium producer globally (Rössing, Husab) and an emerging lithium jurisdiction.
https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2025/Sectors/Mining-Minerals/mining-and-minerals-alert-2-september-developments-in-namibias-mining-law-underway
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇳🇬 Nigeria RMRDC 30% Value Addition Bill — mandatory 30% local processing of ALL raw materials before export
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — Prohibits raw mineral exports unless 30% value-addition achieved domestically; affects Chinese mining companies (dominant in Nigerian critical minerals sector), Western offtake agreements, and all foreign-invested mining JVs; builds on existing eMC+ digital cadastre and mandatory value-addition plans introduced Nov 2024; could force processing-plant investment or suspension of raw mineral shipments from Africa's most populous economy; RMRDC = Raw Materials Research and Development Council (the sponsoring agency)
Caveat — Bill passed third reading in House of Representatives; multiple Nov 2025 sources confirm both chambers approved; as of 2026-06-14 presidential signature not yet confirmed. Distinct from filed Nigeria Tax Reform Acts 2025 (Loi n°1/19 tax restructuring) and Mining Cadastral licence revocations (2025-06-19). Applies to ALL raw materials, not minerals only — IPTM relevance is the mineral export provisions.
https://www.nationalaccordnewspaper.com/turning-point-for-nigeria-as-rmrdcs-30-value-addition-bill-nears-presidential-assent/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇵🇪 Peru Ley General de Minería Amendment — Mining Concession Regime Reform
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 114d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — Reduces maximum idle-concession period from 30 to 15 years (initial production deadline unchanged at 10 yr; penalty extension cut from 20 yr to just 5 yr); eliminates irrevocable legal status of mining concessions for first time in Peruvian law history, making concessions revocable by administrative authority; introduces higher annual fees and stronger production/investment requirements; threatens legal certainty for Peru's undeveloped copper and silver project pipeline — Peru = #2 copper, #4 silver, #1 lead, #2 zinc globally
Caveat — Approved by Energy and Mining Commission March 17, 2026 by 11 votes to 1 with 3 abstentions — driven by left-aligned Juntos por el Perú (JPP) and Podemos Peru majority. Bill also introduces "comuneros como accionistas" (community shareholders) in mining concessions — first legislative insertion of indigenous community equity rights. MINEM, SNMPE, ComexPerú, and Ingemmet publicly opposed; MINEM warns reform would incentivise illegal mining expansion. Full plenary debate pending as of June 2026. Distinct from all filed PE actions (all executive/regulatory decrees — no prior legislative amendment to Ley General de Minería in register). Also distinct from filed PE actions on REINFO extension (2025-12-26), illegal-mining criminalization (2026-01-20), and Tía María revocation (2026-03-19).
https://elcomercio.pe/economia/peru/comision-de-energia-aprueba-cambios-en-la-ley-de-mineria-y-reaviva-alertas-por-impacto-en-inversion-y-estabilidad-juridica-noticia/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇪🇺 EU CRMA Art. 22 Commission Implementing Decision — Strategic Raw Material Stock Benchmarks
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 113d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese, Silicon, Niobium
If passed — Establishes the first legally binding "safe level" benchmark for EU strategic stocks of each of the 17 strategic raw materials listed in the CRMA Annex I; benchmarks used as reference by Member States, financial institutions, and industrial consumers to assess strategic supply risk; mandated every 2 years, so this is the first edition setting the baseline; informs CRMA Art. 23 monitoring obligations and is the evidential basis for Art. 24 corporate-reporting thresholds
Caveat — The May 24, 2026 deadline set by Parliament and Council in Reg. (EU) 2024/1252 has now passed. No OJ publication confirmed as of June 15, 2026 — Commission may have adopted quietly or is overdue. This is the first CRMA Art. 22 benchmark cycle and is legally distinct from: (1) the CRMA base regulation (filed 2024-05-23); (2) the Strategic Projects first designation (filed 2025-03-25); (3) the RESourceEU Amendment — CRMA revision (filed 2026-03-04). If confirmed adopted, severity=2 (establishes the measurement baseline for EU strategic material supply risk assessment and directly feeds corporate Art. 24 reporting obligations). Distinct from all filed EU-CRMA actions. Not in filing. md or upcoming. md.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj/eng
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇬🇭 Ghana Minerals and Mining Act overhaul (Act 703 replacement) + new National Mining Policy
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 111d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Cabinet-cleared bill to replace the 2006 Minerals and Mining Act, Act 703: raises mining royalties from current 3–5% range to 9–12% (price-linked sliding scale), introduces a new medium-scale mining licence category bridging artisanal and large-scale operations, mandates district-level community and traditional-authority consultation before applications reach national regulators, scraps unlimited concession renewals (currently indefinitely renewable), and strengthens Ghanaian ownership provisions; National Mining Policy approved by Cabinet simultaneously; affects Newmont (Ahafo/Akyem), AngloGold Ashanti, Kinross (Chirano), Gold Fields (Tarkwa, post-Damang reversion), and Atlantic Lithium (Ewoyaa lithium project); royalty more than doubles at current gold prices — material cost increase for large-scale operators
Caveat — Distinct from all 6 filed GH actions: distinct from 2025-12-19-ghana-minerals-mining-royalty-regulations-2025 (those set sliding royalty under existing Act 703 — this bill replaces Act 703 entirely and raises the ceiling well beyond current regulations); distinct from 2026-03-13-ghana-growth-sustainability-levy-amendment (profit-based tax, not royalty); distinct from 2026-03-19-ghana-atlantic-lithium-ewoyaa-mining-lease and 2026-04-07-ghana-damang-engineers-planners-lease (specific lease grants, not legislation). The Green Minerals Policy (cabinet-approved July 2023, banning raw mineral exports) has not been separately enacted as of June 2026 — if the new Mining Act incorporates its provisions, that becomes the first statutory export restriction for Ghana's lithium and critical minerals. Filed upcoming 2026-06-17.
https://gna.org.gh/2026/06/govt-hints-scrapping-unlimited-years-of-mining-concession-renewals/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇧🇴 Bolivia nueva Ley de Minería — comprehensive replacement of the 2014 Ley 535 de Minería y Metalurgia
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 111d ago · not yet law·matches Zinc
If passed — New general mining law (distinct from PL-157 lithium/evaporites bill already in index): 20-year tax stability regime for mining projects; eliminates the 12. 5% impuesto adicional IUE-RM on extraordinary commodity-price gains; retains 25% company profits tax (IUE) and 5% royalty; streamlines licensing from current 9–15 years to international norms; enables association contracts between private companies and cooperatives; coordinated with a forthcoming general investment law incorporating fiscal and non-fiscal incentives; framed around reversing 15+ years of investment drought; backing from World Bank; bill to be presented to Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional after Mining Summit (May 18–20, 2026); target: executive submission late July 2026
Caveat — Distinct from 2026-02-01-bolivia-pl-157-recursos-evaporiticos (lithium-only evaporitícos bill; this is the general mining law replacing Ley 535 for ALL mineral sectors) and 2025-12-17-bolivia-ds-5503-economic-emergency (fuel subsidies/fiscal package). Bolivia = world's 7th-largest tin producer and holds the world's largest known lithium resources; the Paz government reform is the most significant pro-investment mining signal since the 2014 Ley 535. Likelihood moderate — new government with World Bank backing but legislative timeline uncertain; Bolivia protests history (2026 protests wiki) creates social-risk overlay. Filed upcoming 2026-06-17.
https://www.mineria.gob.bo/index.php/nota_prensa/bolivia-activa-reforma-minera-integral-y-sale-a-captar-inversiones-con-respaldo-del-banco-mundial/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Zinc🇨🇳 today 38→47+9
🇺🇸 USTR Plurilateral Agreement on Trade in Critical Minerals
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 110d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Binding plurilateral trade agreement among like-minded partners (US, EU, Japan and FORGE coalition members) establishing coordinated trade measures for critical mineral supply chains — including border-adjusted price floors, standards-based market access conditions, price-gap subsidies, and off-take agreement frameworks — to counter non-market pricing from state-backed producers and reduce concentrated supply-chain dependency; would create the first binding multilateral trade-law instrument specifically governing critical minerals flows, operating parallel to and distinct from the WTO goods schedule
Caveat — Distinct from FORGE (Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement, already filed as 2026-02-04-us-forge-critical-minerals-coalition — a diplomatic coordination platform, not a binding trade instrument); distinct from the filed bilateral action plans (US-Mexico 2026-02-04, US-Japan 2026-03-19, US-EU 2026-04-24 — these are bilateral work programmes, not the binding multilateral trade agreement being designed). Public comment period launched February 5, 2026; partners in scope include FORGE member states + EU. If finalised, this would be the highest-severity IPTM action in the register — creates a binding legal framework reshaping the economics of critical mineral trade globally. Context: companion to the US-EU-Japan joint statement of February 4, 2026 which directed the three parties to "develop Action Plans and explore a plurilateral trade initiative with like-minded partners on trade in critical minerals, which could include exploring the development of coordinated trade policies and mechanisms, such as border-adjusted price floors. "
Reference-class base rate
Bills at introduction (pre-committee) in US historically become law ~5% of the time (n=37,132, GovTrack — 117th–118th Congresses) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/february/ustr-seeks-public-comment-design-plurilateral-agreement-trade-critical-minerals-and-policy-actions
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
CEMAC Common Mining Code — 6-member regional harmonisation (April 2026)
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 108d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — If adopted, creates a unified mining regulatory framework across Cameroon, CAR, Congo-Brazzaville, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Chad — harmonising licensing regimes, fiscal terms, transparency obligations (EITI, KP, ICGLR), and environmental standards; would affect Eramet/Comilog manganese operations (Gabon), Sundance Resources iron ore (CAR), Chinese mining JVs (Congo-Brazzaville, CAR), and uranium projects across the region; if enacted, creates a regional investment-guarantee architecture that could facilitate cross-border mining finance and reduce individual-country treaty risk; structural precedent for pooled resource sovereignty in a region where individual states are renegotiating contracts (Gabon post-coup Décret 0276/2024 sovereign-equity mandate, CAR post-KP-readmission, Congo-Brazzaville mining-code review)
Caveat — Consultation meetings held April 2024 (Brazzaville), July 2024 (Riaba/Malabo), February 2025 (regional review workshop), April 2026 (Douala finalization session) — code still in draft form as of April-May 2026; CEMAC has a historically slow ratification track record (Tariff Union took ~15 years to operationalise); likelihood low until formal adoption at heads-of-state summit; DISTINCT from individually filed national mining code reforms: Gabon Décret 0276/2024 (sovereign substances regime), CAR Law 24-008 (new mining code). Filed upcoming 2026-06-20.
https://www.financialafrik.com/en/2026/04/24/cemac-a-common-mining-code-as-a-lever-for-regional-investment/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇹🇿 Tanzania Finance Bill 2026/27 — Parliament-passed June 23, 2026; mining: Mineral Research Fund (10% gross mineral revenue), Income Tax Act & VAT Framework Agreement exemptions
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — TZ Finance Bill establishes the Mineral Research Fund capitalised at 10% of gross mineral revenue (~TZS 141 billion/yr at 2025 collection levels); amends the Income Tax Act to formally recognise tax exemptions granted under individual mining Framework Agreements and introduces standard operating procedures — reduces discretionary government risk for large mining investors (Panda Hill niobium, graphite juniors, Buzwagi gold); parallel VAT amendments give equivalent statutory certainty for VAT exemptions; taken together, the bill moves Tanzania from discretionary tax administration toward a rule-of-law-based investor regime for all critical-mineral projects; budget targets Tanzania for top-4 niobium producer status (Panda Hill DA already signed March 24, 2026) and 50% geophysical survey coverage by 2030
Caveat — Tanzania fiscal year starts July 1; the Finance Act signature typically occurs last week of June. Budget speech delivered June 11, 2026 by Finance Minister Khamis Mussa Omar; Parliament approved June 23. Mining provisions in §§ amending Income Tax Act (Cap. 332) and VAT Act (Cap. 148) and establishing the Mineral Research Fund. Distinct from: filed 2025-06-30-tanzania-finance-act-11-of-2025 (prior year), filed 2026-03-24-tanzania-panda-hill-niobium-ferroniobium-development-agreement (the specific project DA), and filed 2026-04-15-tanzania-ministry-of-minerals-revokes-40-idle-mineral-exploration-licences. Severity 2: institutional reform that de-risks the investor regime rather than a direct trade restriction.
https://www.tanzaniainvest.com/economy/budget-2026-2027-parliament-approved
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇹🇿 Tanzania Finance Bill 2026/27 — NEW raw-mineral EXPORT LEVY on quartz (HS 25.06) and feldspar (HS 2529.10.00) under the Export Tax Act, Cap. 196
awaiting-signature→high likelihood·flagged 100d ago · not yet law·matches Silicon
If passed — The same Finance Bill 2026/27 already tabled (Parliament-passed 23 June 2026, effective 1 July 2026) inserts a NEW export levy of "10% of the FOB value of the cargo OR TZS 200 per kilogram, whichever is higher" on exports of quartz minerals (HS 25. 06) and feldspar (HS 2529. 10. 00) via amendment to the Export Tax Act, Cap. 196 — a distinct beneficiation-forcing EXPORT-TAX instrument that pushes raw quartz/feldspar exporters toward in-country value-addition. 196), and neither existing entry mentions it; (2) material-relevant — quartz HS 25. 06 covers high-purity/silica quartz feeding the silicon→semiconductor/solar value chain, so a Tanzanian export tax re-prices a raw-silica supply node; the same "rocks to riches" beneficiation logic Tanzania applies elsewhere; (3) part of the wider African raw-mineral-export-tax wave (cf. Zimbabwe 10% lithium-concentrate levy, Namibia unprocessed-mineral ban, Guinea bauxite reference price).
Caveat — On enactment, fold into that one TZ Finance Act 2026 action with action_type capturing both the fiscal-incentive and the export-levy (export-control/tariff) provisions; do NOT double-file. Distinct from filed 2025-06-30-tanzania-finance-act-11-of-2025 (prior year — no quartz/feldspar export levy). Severity 2 (sectoral raw-mineral export tax, niche HS lines).
https://polis.bunge.go.tz/uploads/bills/1781852249-Muswada_wa_Sheriia_ya_Fedha_wa_Mwaka_2026_(The_Finance_Bill,_2026).pdf
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Silicon🇨🇳 today 66→70+4
🇺🇸 US BOEM Proposed Rule — Administrative Revisions to OCS Hard Minerals Regulations (FR Doc. 2026-03690)
passed-committee→elevated likelihood·flagged 105d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Revises 30 CFR Part 580 to streamline 10 provisions governing prospecting, leasing, and operations for hard minerals (manganese nodules, cobalt-rich crusts, seafloor massive sulfides) on the US Outer Continental Shelf; eliminates environmental notification to adjacent state governors (§580. 31) and BOEM's own environmental review requirement (§580. 29); accelerates OCS hard mineral leasing pipeline in line with EOs 14285 and 14154 ("unleashing" OCS resources); comment period closed April 27, 2026; awaiting final rule
Caveat — First substantive revision of US OCS hard minerals regulatory framework in ~35 years; distinct from all filed US actions (no prior OCS hard minerals action in register). Severity 2: regulatory infrastructure that enables future OCS leasing rather than a direct production/export instrument; secondary-boem: https://www. boem. gov/newsroom/press-releases/boem-proposes-rule-changes-support-critical-mineral-exploration-and
Reference-class base rate
Bills at out of committee in US historically become law ~21% of the time (n=1,687, GovTrack — 117th Congress (2021–2023)) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/24/2026-03690/administrative-revisions-to-regulations-related-to-outer-continental-shelf-minerals-other-than-oil
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇬🇦 Gabon — Government to Subscribe to Eramet €500M Capital Increase, Acquiring Equity Stake in French Parent Company
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Gabon (CTRI transitional government, President Oligui Nguema) announced at Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi (May 2026) its intention to subscribe to Eramet SA's €500M capital increase, giving the Gabonese state direct equity in the French-listed parent of COMILOG (its primary manganese mining subsidiary in Moanda). Gabon already holds 29% of COMILOG; a stake in Eramet SA itself would give Gabon leverage over the global operations of the parent group (smelting, nickel, lithium, manganese across France, Norway, Senegal, and Indonesia) and a seat at the Eramet Board. Eramet AGM (May 27, 2026) approved the capital raise resolution. Capital raise planned for H2 2026. Distinct from: filed 2025-05-30-gabon-raw-manganese-export-ban-2029 (the export ban forcing value-addition); filed 2024-07-02-gabon-decret-0276-regimes-des-substances-souveraines (35% state free-carry in new mines) — this is an equity purchase in the parent company, not a free-carry in a Gabonese concession; new vector of state resource-control
Caveat — Eramet capital raise planned for H2 2026; no decree number or gazette reference from Gabon available as of June 26, 2026. Gabon's National Strategic Investment Fund (FONSIG) or CTRI Council of Ministers would be the authorising body. Eramet SA (Euronext Paris: ERA) is ~37% owned by French state arm BPIFRANCE as at 2025 — a Gabon stake would create a two-sovereign ownership structure over the world's second-largest manganese ore exporter. Severity 3 expected if completed: creates direct state leverage over COMILOG's pricing, capex, and processing decisions, going beyond the 2029 ore export ban.
https://www.africanews.com/2026/05/13/gabon-move-to-acquire-stake-in-international-manganese-mining-company/
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇮🇳 India SASCI Mining Sector Reforms Component FY2026-27 — ₹5,000 crore incentive scheme to accelerate mine auction-to-production pipeline
announced→low likelihood·flagged 102d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Ministry of Mines issued operational guidelines for the Mining Sector Reforms component under Scheme for Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASCI) FY2026-27, with total ₹5,000 crore (~USD 600M) incentive envelope to states; key components: (i) ₹250 crore one-time incentive to any state where ≥10% of pre-March-2026 auctioned major mineral blocks begin production+dispatch by end-2026; (ii) ₹100 crore baseline for systemic reforms (Unified Mining Portal integration, Pre-Auction Committees); (iii) ₹20 crore per block auctioned with pre-embedded forest and environmental clearances; scheme targets removing the "auction gap" — India has auctioned hundreds of mineral blocks since 2015 MMDR amendments but operationalisation lag remains a structural bottleneck; critical minerals relevance: India is running parallel programme of critical+strategic mineral auctions (7 tranches, 56 blocks auctioned by June 24, 2026) and this scheme incentivises states to bring those blocks into production faster; directly accelerates lithium (Rajasthan), REE (Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu), graphite (Odisha), and nickel (Odisha, Jharkhand) pipelines
Caveat — Source is secondary (PolicyEdge news aggregator). To migrate to filing. md, filer must verify the primary notification on mines. gov. in or pib. gov. in (search "SASCI Mining 2026-27" on PIB search). India BHAVYA industrial parks scheme (₹33,660 crore, March 18, 2026) is separately filed — SASCI is a distinct scheme targeting state-level mining-sector governance reform. Distinct from filed India Union Budget 2026-27 Customs notifications and Semiconductor Mission 2. 0. Severity 2 (supply-side demand-unlock rather than export control or FDI gate).
https://www.policyedge.in/p/centre-launches-5000-crore-incentive-scheme-to-speed-up-mine-auctions-and-production
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (low likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇲🇳 Mongolia Minerals Law Comprehensive Amendment 2026 — ~40% of 2006 law revised; exploration-licence term cut, statutory critical-minerals definition, downstream-beneficiation licensing
draft-published→moderate likelihood·flagged 101d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Mongolia's cabinet approved and submitted to the State Great Khural a draft amending ~40% of the 2006 Minerals Law: (i) cuts the maximum exploration-licence duration from 12 to 6 years while raising holding fees (to curb speculative licence-trading/flipping); (ii) introduces a STATUTORY definition of "critical minerals" (aligned to Mongolia's 11-mineral list: molybdenum, manganese, nickel, copper, fluorspar, graphite, REEs, cobalt, lithium, PGMs, tungsten) and a SEPARATE licensing regime for downstream beneficiation plants; (iii) mandates mine-closure plans + financial bonding once a mine reaches 75% of its life; aims to accelerate licence issuance and expand the resource base. Mongolia is a structural China/Russia-flanked chokepoint pursuing Western REE/copper partnerships (US FORGE, JP, KR), so a domestic critical-minerals statutory regime + downstream-processing licensing reprices the entry terms for any foreign developer of Mongolian copper/REE/fluorspar (Oyu Tolgoi-adjacent, Erdenes critical-minerals SOE pipeline).
Caveat — As of 2026-06-27 the bill is cabinet-approved and submitted to Parliament — NOT yet passed, hence axis-2/upcoming. Likelihood moderate: ruling-party majority favours passage but Mongolian minerals-law amendments are politically contested and frequently amended in committee. Distinct from filed 2024-04-19-mongolia-sovereign-wealth-fund-law (SWF + 34% strategic-deposit state-stake amendments), filed 2025-01-15-mongolia-critical-minerals-support-law (the separate critical-minerals PROJECT-support draft law), and filed 2025-09-05-mongolia-mpe-royalty-calculation-shift (royalty base shift to the Mining Product Exchange). Severity 3 expected if enacted.
https://mono.mn/n/government_approves_draft
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇪🇺 EU European Critical Raw Materials (CRM) Centre — establishing instrument
consultation-closed (pre-proposal; CFE + OPC both closed 2026-07-29)→elevated likelihood·flagged 68d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — RESourceEU (COM(2025) 945, 3 Dec 2025) commits the Commission to establish a **European Critical Raw Materials Centre** in early 2026 with four functions: (a) generate **systemic market intelligence on CRM value chains**; (b) steer and de-risk finance into strategic projects with public and private partners; (c) support **strategic stockpiling**; and (d) run **joint purchasing** by pooling company orders and matchmaking demand with supply (a "raw materials platform" pooling orders and creating joint stocks, with an EU-coordinated stockpiling pilot to become operational in the following year). A **call for evidence + public consultation opened 19 May 2026**, and the Commission announced a **legislative proposal for Q2 2026**. Supply-relief on the material axis (EU-side aggregation, stockpiles and de-risking finance directly loosen chokepoint exposure for EU industrial buyers), but it also creates a new EU purchasing/allocation gatekeeper whose membership and priority rules will be contested. If it carries reporting or data-submission duties on participating companies, it becomes a second corporate-facing CRM information obligation alongside CRMA Art. 24.
Caveat — europa. eu/info/law/better-regulation/brpapi/groupInitiatives/14832) serves the registry entry directly. Verified: initiative **id 14832**, ref **Ares(2025)6918424**, planning ref **PLAN/2025/1815**, lead **DG GROW**, **isMajor: true**, foreseen act **PROP_REG**; the Commission's own dossier summary names the four pillars as **joint purchasing, stockpiling, investments, and raw materials intelligence**. (1) The **19 May 2026 launch IS confirmed** — both consultation publications carry publishedDate 2026/05/19; the call for evidence (CFE_IMPACT_ASSESS, titled "Legislative proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the EU Critical Raw Materials Centre") and the open public consultation (OPC_LAUNCHED) each ran a 10-week window that **CLOSED 2026-07-29 23:59:59**, drawing **138** and **72** submissions respectively. (2) The **Q2-2026 slip is confirmed, not a fetch artefact** — the PROP_REG publication still carries plannedPeriod "Q-2026-2" (2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30) with initiativeStatus **UPCOMING**, and a EUR-Lex check on 2026-07-31 finds no COM(2026) text establishing the Centre: ~31 days overdue by the Commission's own planning record, neither folded into another instrument nor silently adopted. **Legal form now known: a Regulation of the EP and Council** → full ordinary legislative procedure after the proposal lands, so an operational Centre is a 2027+ event. Cheapest future check: re-poll the same API endpoint and watch for the PROP_REG publication flipping to published. Distinct from filed 2025-12-03-eu-resourceeu-action-plan-com-2025-945 (the umbrella action plan announcing the intent — this item tracks the specific instrument establishing the Centre), from the CRMA base regulation (filed 2024-05-23), from the CRMA Art. 22 strategic-stock benchmarks item (line 103 above — that is a benchmark-setting implementing measure, this is an institution-creating instrument), and from the permanent-magnet scrap export restriction (line 141 above). ALSO a competitive-positioning item, not only a register item: a publicly-funded EU body with a statutory CRM market-intelligence remit is the most credible free substitute for our minerals intelligence layer — see the 2026-07-30 entry in docs/strategy/mandate_triggers_watch. md ("Demand-narrative signals").
https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/01c448d6-dc93-40d7-9afe-4c2af448d00c_en
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (elevated likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6
🇲🇼 Malawi — Presidential Executive Order banning export of all raw/unprocessed minerals (effective 21 Oct 2025)
passed-vote→high likelihood·flagged 54d ago · not yet law·matches Niobium
If passed — President Peter Mutharika signed an executive order (dated 23 Oct 2025, effective 21 Oct 2025, announced at Sanjika Palace during a cabinet swearing-in) prohibiting the export of raw/unprocessed minerals extracted in Malawi — uranium, rare earth elements, niobium, graphite, tantalum, bauxite, coal, limestone, gemstones, heavy mineral sands, vermiculite, phosphate, rutile, gold, diamonds, copper and others — with an exemption for minerals processed/refined/value-added domestically per Malawian mining law. Announced alongside a suspension of new mining-licence issuance and a review of mining laws (2026/27 State of the Nation Address), plus a planned sovereign wealth fund. Stated rationale: local beneficiation, targeting up to USD 500m/yr once the Kasiya rutile/graphite deposit (Lilongwe) and Kangankunde rare-earth project (Balaka, Mkango Resources — Africa's prospective first new REE mine since 2017, targeting late-2026 production) are fully developed. Violators face fines/penalties under Malawian law. MW is currently the THINNEST country in the register (1 prior action) despite this breadth of minerals covered. Export-ban/beneficiation-mandate, same instrument class as Zimbabwe's SI 213/2022 raw-mineral bans and Guinea's 2026 gold-export ban already in the register.
Caveat — ENACTED (signed order, in force since 21 Oct 2025) but parked here rather than filing. gov. mw directly (TLS cert mismatch: cert is issued for agriculture. gov. mw, not statehouse. gov. mw) and the malawiace. com implementation-analysis piece cites no gov URL either. Same park-lot convention as the DRC ARECOMS / Sudan / Egypt / Morocco / Brazil / India lines above (real, already-enacted action; primary URL not independently locatable this wake). Dedup: action-index has only 1 Malawi action total, none overlapping (no prior MW export-ban or beneficiation-mandate action exists). Severity 3-4 expected given the breadth of minerals covered and MW's fast-growing REE/graphite production profile.
https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/business-tech/malawi-president-mutharika-bans-exports-of-raw-minerals-5247332
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (high likelihood)
- Niobium🇧🇷 today 55→63+8
🇨🇮 Côte d'Ivoire — Revision of the 2014 Code Minier (Loi n° 2014-138)
in-consultation→moderate likelihood·flagged 27d ago · not yet law·matches Manganese
If passed — Minister of Mines, Petroleum and Energy Mamadou Sangafowa-Coulibaly formally launched the revision of Côte d'Ivoire's 2014 Mining Code on 13 June 2026, standing up an expert team drawn from his ministry, other state institutions and international bodies to rewrite Loi n° 2014-138 du 24 mars 2014. Stated goals: raise state revenue share, fix "disparate and sometimes poorly negotiated" mining conventions, and modernise the mining cadastre. No draft bill text published yet — this is a mandate/committee-formation stage, distinct from and earlier than the already-filed 2026-02-04 Assafou/Doropo gold-permit decrees and the 2025-12-03 PIRME minerals-energy policy (2025-2040), both of which operate under the CURRENT 2014 code rather than proposing to replace it. Chokepoint-relevant: register's only prior CI code-minier-lineage entries are the 2014 code itself and a 2022 local-content oil/gas law — no entry tracks this active rewrite.
Caveat — Dedup: checked action-index and both queues for "code minier"/"mining code" + CI — only hits are the already-filed 2014 code, the 2022 local-content petroleum law, and the 2024-12 gold-royalty finance law, none of which is this revision effort. Distinct from Senegal's and Morocco's already-queued mining-code amendments (different issuer/instrument).
https://www.energie.gouv.ci/actualite/sangafowa-coulibaly-veut-booster-lattractivite-du-code-minier
If passed & escalated to a full control regime — modelled impact (moderate likelihood)
- Manganese🇨🇳 today 71→77+6

What to watch next

Forward-looking read on the binding chokepoint, from the recent trajectory of policy on these materials. Directional, not a forecast.

The watch listShow

Manganese is the line to war-game: 🇨🇳 CN already controls 90% of refining, and the policy lever is active. A single new licensing or export-control action on this material moves the binding score materially.
Silicon carries 19 restrictive measures on record (🇨🇳 CN 80% of refining) — a secondary escalation candidate.
Niobium carries 5 restrictive measures on record (🇧🇷 BR 89% of refining) — a secondary escalation candidate.

Art. 24(4) · diversification & substitution

Priority mitigations

The mitigation optionsShow

Map your real exposure to Manganese. Trace it from the component back to the smelter/refiner and country of origin — most buyers discover the dependence is one tier deeper than their direct supplier.
Qualify a non-CN source. Identify and validate at least one supplier outside CN for the binding input before it is needed, even at a cost premium — optionality is the hedge.
Lead-time to re-source is ~9 months (6-12mo). The largest tracked non-CN producer of Manganese is 🇿🇦 ZA (~5% of refining); scaling it into a replacement is roughly a 6-12mo ramp. A share-of-stage substitution heuristic derived from current production share, not a firm supplier quote.
Hold strategic inventory / contract forward. For materials with no substitute and active export controls, a buffer stock or long-dated offtake converts a shock into a managed cost.
Run a live policy tripwire. Monitor MOFCOM, EU CRMA and the exporting jurisdictions for new measures on your materials, with a pre-agreed escalation if a licensing regime tightens — this register is that monitor.

Annex A · regulatory basis

CRMA Art. 24 compliance crosswalk

The full crosswalkShow

CRMA provision	Obligation	Where addressed
Art. 24(1)	Member State identifies the company as in-scope (uses an SRM to make a listed strategic technology).	Scope & applicability
Art. 24(2)(a)	Map where the strategic raw materials are extracted, processed and recycled.	Exposure register + Supply-risk factor analysis
Art. 24(2)(b)	Analyse the factors that might affect supply.	Supply-risk factor analysis (factor matrix) + The laws that threaten it
Art. 24(2)(c)	Assess vulnerabilities to supply disruptions.	Stress test + significant-vulnerability conclusion
Art. 24(3)	Where supplier data is unavailable, rely on Commission (Art. 20(4)) / public sources.	This report's basis — see Methodology & sources
Art. 24(4)	Where significant vulnerabilities are found, assess diversifying or substituting.	Significant-vulnerability conclusion + Priority mitigations
Art. 24(5)–(6)	Report results, sources, significant risks and mitigations to the board.	This document — board-ready, PDF-exportable

Annex B · Art. 24(1) · Art. 2(29)

Scope & applicability

Article 24 applies only when both size thresholds are met and a Member State has identified the company as making a listed strategic technology with strategic raw materials.

Scope detailsShow

Threshold test	This assessment
Average employees (last FY) > 500	company input
Net worldwide turnover (last FY) > €150M	company input
Uses a strategic raw material as an input	Yes — 4 scored SRMs on the input side (binding: Manganese)
Manufactures a listed strategic technology	mining-metals (confirm against Annex)
Formally identified by a Member State authority	company input

Evidence & sources

Production-concentration figures: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 + the production dataset behind each material page. Policy measures trace to the primary government sources below.

All sourcesShow

Methodology

MACROLENS · CICONIALABS · GEOPOLITICAL SUPPLY-RISK REPORT (EU CRMA ART. 20–25) · report generated 2026-10-06

Tip: the change log above defaults to the last 30 days. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date (e.g. ?since=2026-04-01).

Refresh SLA

New government measures — polled hourly; a filed action can appear on this report within the hour it's picked up.
Dossier verification (this company's exposure list, sourced against its own disclosures) — the auto-onboarded backlog drains on a 30-minute cycle; a specific company's upgrade timing depends on queue position, not a fixed date.
Live-quoted materials (currently: neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, terbium, indium, tellurium — see the price row on each material's page) — refreshed daily.
Other material prices — hand-maintained; flagged STALE on the minerals index past 45 days without a fresh source, rather than left silently out of date.

This is a description of the actual automated pipeline (verifiable against this repo's own cron schedule), not a contractual commitment.