Loading…
Loading…
Norway is a Wassenaar Arrangement and Australia Group participant but is not an EU member, so its dual-use export-control architecture sits on a Norwegian regulation (the Eksportkontrollforskrift) that incorporates by reference the EU Dual-Use Regulation 2021/821 Annex I (Wassenaar / international- regime controls) plus a national Annex II. The October 2024 amendment introduces a third national annex — Annex III — for emerging or disruptive technologies that Oslo judges control- worthy but that have not yet been added to the EU list.
Annex III items require a licence from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Utenriksdepartementet, UD) for export to any destination, including EU/EEA partners, and trigger a catch-all obligation: exporters of items not listed must apply for a licence if they know or are informed that the item is or may be intended for use in development of WMD, conventional weapons in a sanctioned theatre, or "of military end use" in a controlled destination.
Technical scope of Annex III as published:
apparatus, deposition equipment and related sub-systems for advanced-node logic and memory fabrication.
substrates; high-performance integrated circuits beyond defined performance thresholds.
technology that can extract layout data from microchips to generate circuit netlists.
qubit thresholds, plus quantum software and quantum technology.
manufacturing of metal or metal-alloy components, where the geometry/precision profile maps to defence-relevant end use.
This is Norway's first dedicated national emerging-technology list — prior to the amendment, controls outside the EU Annex I were handled almost entirely through catch-all and ad-hoc licensing.
Norway, Denmark and Finland now publishing national emerging- tech lists alongside the US BIS Sep-2024 IFR, NL national rule, UK and Japan, the licensing perimeter around advanced semis, quantum and metal-AM is increasingly continuous across the Wassenaar plurilateral signatories. Re-export and tech-transfer pathways through Oslo are no longer a softer alternative to Brussels-routed shipments.
has a small but non-trivial quantum sensing / silicon-photonics ecosystem (Equinor-funded R&D, SINTEF-spinouts) and an active metal-AM cluster (Norsk Titanium, Equinor-aligned subsea AM). Annex III brings these under UD licensing for any export destination — a compliance overhead increase, particularly for university tech-transfer.
This fills a structural gap flagged in wake-discovery: Norway previously had only seabed-mining + Meld.St.16 + the US-Norway CRM MoU on the books, with no export-control instruments.
to China and other "controlled destinations"? No statistics have been published yet — the leading indicator of whether Norway runs a strict-tilt (closer to NL/JP/US) or permissive- tilt (closer to EU general-authorisation defaults) regime.
Delegated Regulation 2025/2003) and migrate Annex III items into the harmonised EU list, retiring the national annex? Same question facing the other national lists (NL, DK, FI, ES, UK).
MoU** (Jan 2025)? The MoU does not cover dual-use tech, but there is a question of whether Norwegian quantum/AM firms with US end-customers will see overlapping US (BIS) + Norwegian (UD) licence requirements for the same transactions.