Industrial Policy & Trade Monitor· 2662 actions· ✨ 89 recent

On June 17, 2026, BIS announced a $36,184,680 civil penalty settlement with Robert Bosch GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) — the largest-ever BIS enforcement penalty against a non-US company for Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR) violations. Between September 16, 2020 and September 26, 2024, Bosch exported approximately $72.4 million in MEMS sensor products and automotive software from abroad to Huawei Technologies and its Entity List affiliates without the required BIS license. Bosch filed a Voluntary Self-Disclosure and cooperated throughout; the DOJ issued the first-ever NSD declination under its newly established Corporate Enforcement Policy, declining criminal prosecution entirely.

BIS published a technical correction to the Entity List (15 CFR Part 744, Supplement No. 4) fixing three errors in the February 14, 2022 final rule (87 FR 8180; FR Doc. 2022-03029) that added and revised Huawei entities. Two entries — Huawei Cloud Brazil (São Paulo) and Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (China, with 22+ affiliated addresses) — incorrectly cited §736.2(b)(3)(vi) as the Foreign Direct Product rule trigger instead of the correct §734.9(e) (the Huawei-specific FDP rule); a third error was a typographical fix to the footnote reference ("except for" → "EXCEPT\2\ for"). No new restrictions were created; the substantive export control status of all listed Huawei entities is unchanged, but exporters relying on the CFR text now have the correct regulatory citation for license requirement determinations.

Effective 3 February 2022, the Bureau of Industry and Security published a final rule (87 FR 6231, FR Doc 2022-02302) consolidating all existing Foreign Direct Product (FDP) rules from scattered locations in EAR Parts 736 and 744 into a single new section, 15 CFR §734.9, under Part 734 (Scope of the EAR). The rule made no substantive changes to existing controls — it reorganised four pre-existing FDP rules (National Security, 9x515, 600 Series, and Entity List) into a clean §734.9(b)–(e) architecture, clarified the definition of "major component" at §734.9(a), and corrected a drafting ambiguity that had obscured the U.S.-origin technology trigger for three of the four rules. The newly created §734.9 structure became the vehicle used by BIS to add the Russia/Belarus FDP rule (§734.9(f)) just 21 days later, on 24 February 2022.

The US Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 37 entities under 40 entries to the Entity List, effective December 17, 2021. The additions span three distinct threat rationales: (1) support for Chinese military modernization across semiconductors, submarine cables, armored vehicles, and defense electronics; (2) the Academy of Military Medical Sciences and 11 affiliated institutes pursuing biotechnology processes for military end uses, including purported brain-control weaponry under EAR §744.11(b); and (3) a cross-border Iran sanctions-evasion network operating across China, Georgia, Malaysia, and Turkey that diverted US-origin items to Iran's defense industries and advanced conventional weapons programs. All 40 entries carry a presumption-of-denial licensing policy for all items subject to the EAR, with no license exceptions available.

Effective 17 August 2020 (published in the Federal Register 20 August 2020, Vol. 85 No. 162, FR Doc 2020-18213), BIS implemented three simultaneous measures targeting Huawei's global supply chain. First, 38 non-U.S. affiliates of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. were added to the Entity List with the most restrictive license review policy (presumption of denial) and designated under footnote 1, extending the Huawei-specific Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule (FDPR) to their operations. Second, the Temporary General License (TGL), which since May 2019 had authorized limited ongoing transactions with Huawei (network maintenance, software updates, standards participation), was allowed to expire on 13 August 2020 and replaced with a narrower authorization. Third, BIS expanded the scope of the Huawei FDPR (General Prohibition Three) to cover foreign-produced items when a footnote 1 entity is a party to any transaction or when the item will be used in the production or development of products for any footnote 1 entity, closing the design-house loophole that had allowed TSMC to supply HiSilicon/Kirin chips as long as Huawei was not the direct importer.