Loading…
Loading…
Structured register of government actions in the geoeconomic space — export controls, tariffs, sanctions, FDI screening, subsidies, industrial-policy laws — cross-referenced into the country, minerals, and ETF surface. Charter: docs/IPTM_CHARTER.md.
Severity 1-5 is the qualitative impact rating (1=minor, 5=structural). The bilateral-trade-grounded quant scorer is the next IPTM milestone. RBI (Register Breadth Index) is a complementary structural-breadth indicator from scripts/py/iptm/breadth.py; divergence between RBI and severity is itself informative (high-sev / low-RBI = strategic chokepoint; low-sev / high-RBI = broad but shallow). Every action has at least one primary source URL. Verify-or-don't-file. See also themes, timeline, graph, sankey, map, country exposure, sector exposure, material exposure (+ graph), weekly briefs, portfolio scan, escalation monitor, trans-shipment hubs. Internal triage tools (RSS-poller candidate feed, source-feed health) live under /admin/candidates + /admin/sources. Subscribe via Atom feed (accepts ?country=CN, ?material=lithium, ?issuer=BIS, ?type=export_control, ?etf=SOXX, ?company=NVDA, ?minSeverity=4, ?year=2026, ?q=…) or pull /api/iptm/actions.
Canada's Special Economic Measures Act (SEMA, S.C. 1992, c. 17; assented 4 June 1992) is the foundational umbrella statute enabling the entire Canadian autonomous sanctions regime — economic measures imposed by Canada independently of UN Security Council mandatory obligations. The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, make regulations against a foreign state and its nationals or entities under four statutory triggers: (a) a grave breach of international peace and security causing or likely to cause a serious international crisis; (b) an international organisation or association of states to which Canada belongs has called for economic measures; (c) gross and systematic human-rights violations have been committed; or (d) acts of significant corruption by a foreign state's nationals or entities. As of the 2026-03-17 consolidation, 26 regulations are in force under SEMA targeting Russia, Ukraine (separatist entities), Iran, DPRK, Myanmar, Belarus, Syria, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, South Sudan, Libya, Haiti, Nicaragua, Moldova, and others — making SEMA the parent authority for the broadest multilateral-allied autonomous-sanctions toolkit outside the United States. Structurally peer-foundational to the UK Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 (SAMLA), the CN Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law 2021, and Japan's FEFTA.
South Korea's Foreign Trade Act (대외무역법, Act No. 5211, enacted 31 December 1986 and repeatedly amended) is the foundational statutory framework of the Republic of Korea's foreign trade and export-control regime. It establishes the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) as the administering authority for foreign trade policy and empowers it to designate strategic items, issue and revoke export licences, operate catch-all controls over non-listed goods destined for WMD-development end-uses, and coordinate with the Nuclear Suppliers Group-administered National Security Authority for Strategic Commerce (NSASC) on Category-0 nuclear items and the Defence Acquisition Programme Administration (DAPA) on military goods. Every MOTIE strategic-items notification (the "Public Notice on Export and Import of Strategic Materials," currently encompassing Categories 1-9 dual-use items harmonised with Wassenaar, MTCR, AG, and NSG) and every MOTIE outbound-investment screening measure derives its legal authority from the Act.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA, Title II of Pub. L. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626, codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701–1708) was signed by President Carter on 28 December 1977 and grants the President sweeping authority to declare a national emergency with respect to "any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States" — and then to investigate, regulate, direct, compel, nullify, void, prevent, or prohibit any transaction in, or involving, foreign exchange, banking transfers, importing, exporting, or dealings in property by persons subject to US jurisdiction. IEEPA is the parent enabling statute for every OFAC-administered autonomous sanctions program (Russia, Iran, DPRK, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, Belarus, Myanmar, cyber, Global Magnitsky, Hong Kong, ICC, and others) as well as the legal basis for the entire Trump-era IEEPA-tariff regime (EO 14193–14195 fentanyl tariffs, Canada/Mexico/China; EO 14257 reciprocal-tariff framework; EO 14323 Brazil; EO 14380 Cuba; EO 14382 Iran; and the US-India interim tariff agreement). Between 1977 and 2025 Presidents invoked IEEPA in 77 national-emergency declarations; of these, 7+ directly parent IPTM-filed implementing actions, with ~dozens of OFAC SDN designation actions tracing their legal root to this statute.
The Trade Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-618, 88 Stat. 1978), signed into law by President Ford on 3 January 1975 and codified principally at 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101–2497b, is the foundational US statute authorising the executive branch to respond to foreign unfair trade practices and to negotiate trade agreements. Title III (§§ 2411–2420), universally known as "Section 301," empowers the United States Trade Representative to investigate foreign acts, policies, or practices that violate trade agreements or are unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory and burden or restrict US commerce, and — upon an affirmative finding — to impose tariffs, import restrictions, denial of trade-agreement benefits, or other retaliatory measures. Section 301 is the legal basis for every major US unfair-trade-practice retaliation action filed in the IPTM register, including the 2018–2024 China tariff Lists 1–4 and their 2024 escalation, the 2025 China maritime/shipbuilding investigation, the 2025 Brazil investigation, and the 2026 structural-excess-capacity investigation against sixteen economies.
The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Pub. L. 87-794, 76 Stat. 872), signed into law by President Kennedy on 11 October 1962 and codified at 19 U.S.C. §§ 1801–1991, is the foundational US statute granting the executive branch broad authority to negotiate tariff reductions and, critically via Section 232 (19 U.S.C. § 1862), to adjust imports of any article found by the Secretary of Commerce to threaten to impair national security. Section 232 empowers the President — on receipt of a Commerce Department affirmative national-security finding — to impose tariffs, quantitative restrictions, or other import-adjustment measures without congressional approval or WTO-required safeguard procedures. From 1962 to the Trump Administration's 2018–2026 wave of Section 232 Proclamations, the authority was invoked primarily for petroleum and machine-tool imports; since 2018 it has become the legal vehicle for national-security tariffs on steel, aluminum, automobiles, copper, timber, critical minerals, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, with 19+ IPTM-filed implementing instruments citing Pub. L. 87-794 / 19 U.S.C. § 1862 as their statutory parent.
The Defense Production Act of 1950 (Pub. L. 81-774, 64 Stat. 798, codified at 50 U.S.C. §§4501–4568) is the foundational US statute governing wartime and emergency industrial mobilization. Signed by President Truman on 8 September 1950 during the Korean War, the Act empowers the President to compel industrial priority-rated ordering (Title I / DPAS), authorize direct investment in domestic production capacity for critical industries (Title III), and conduct investment security review (Title VII, precursor to CFIUS). Reauthorized approximately 50 times, most recently extended through September 2025 by Pub. L. 115-263 (2018) and further extended under NDAA FY2026; it has been invoked by every Administration since 1950 and has accelerated dramatically since 2020 to target critical-minerals processing, semiconductor manufacturing, battery supply chains, biopharmaceuticals, and energy infrastructure.
Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act (FEFTA, Act No. 228 of 1 December 1949; 外国為替及び外国貿易法) is the foundational umbrella statute governing the entire modern Japanese economic-statecraft toolkit. Originally a restrictive positive-list regime for foreign-exchange transactions, FEFTA was fundamentally liberalised by the 1980 revision (positive-list to negative-list shift) and again overhauled in 1998 to establish the modern regulatory architecture. Three principal enforcement arms operate under FEFTA: (i) security export controls administered by METI via the Export Trade Control Order and the Foreign Exchange Order (covering the Wassenaar Arrangement, Australia Group, MTCR, NSG, and CWC controlled-items lists plus Japan-specific catch-all controls); (ii) inward FDI screening administered jointly by the Ministry of Finance and sector ministries (prior notification and pre-notification regime, substantially expanded 2019–2020 with Core Business Sectors covering semiconductors, critical minerals, advanced materials, cloud computing, and aerospace added 2021); and (iii) autonomous economic sanctions (asset- freeze and payment-restriction designations against Russia, Iran, DPRK, Myanmar, Belarus, and others via Cabinet Orders made under FEFTA authority). Structurally peer-foundational to the US Trade Expansion Act 1962, US Trade Act 1974, UK SAMLA 2018, CN Export Control Law 2020, and CN Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law 2021 as the G7+CN foundational economic- statecraft statute cluster.
The Tariff Act of 1930 (Pub. L. 71-361, 46 Stat. 590, codified principally at 19 U.S.C. Chapter 4) is the foundational US statute governing customs revenue, tariff classification, and trade-remedy administration, signed by President Hoover on 17 June 1930. The Act's original Smoot-Hawley tariff schedules are widely cited as a contributing factor to the contraction of global trade during the Great Depression, but the statute's enduring significance lies in its creation of (i) the Title VII antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) proceedings framework administered jointly by Commerce ITA and the USITC — the parent authority for every US AD/CVD order in force today — and (ii) Section 337 (19 U.S.C. §1337), the USITC unfair-import and IP-exclusion-order regime under which ~50+ active investigations are conducted annually against semiconductor, biotech, electronics, and other technology imports. Title I's customs-valuation and HTSUS tariff- classification framework underpins all US import-revenue collection; Title VII AD/CVD authority was updated by the GATT Tokyo Round Trade Agreements Act of 1979 and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994 (URAA) to align with WTO Antidumping and Subsidies Agreements.