Loading…
Loading…
Boeing is the world's largest aerospace and defence manufacturer, producing commercial jetliners (737, 767, 777, 787 Dreamliner), military aircraft (F/A-18, AH-64 Apache, KC-46 tanker), satellites, and missiles, and providing global aviation services.
Group exposure score is 81 including 1 tracked subsidiary — standalone is 78.
9 other tracked dossiers name this company as a counterparty in its own sourced disclosure — this platform never wrote these rows on this company's own page, they are read here inverted from the dossier that disclosed them. This is a partial view: 982 additional named-counterparty rows across the corpus could not be matched to a tracked dossier by name at all (mostly non-Latin legal names), so the true count is higher than what renders here.
2009 announcement: ~$49M potential six-year contract for IMP Aerospace Components (Amherst, NS) to manufacture structural components/assemblies for Boeing's CH-47 Chinook Heavy Lift Helicopter; source states IMP had supplied Boeing for over 20 years prior. No current contract value/share disclosed.
KAI is a Tier-1 aerostructures subcontractor to Boeing across B737/747/767/777/787 programs. FlightGlobal (2024-12-10, replacing a dead koreaaero.com citation, 2026-09-27) reports a six-year Boeing 737 MAX empennage contract extension worth KRW1.13tn/$788m for 2027-2032, following an existing 2022-2026 empennage contract. Contract value is scale, not a share of KAI revenue, so not recorded as share_pct.
KHI's own newsroom names Boeing and the parts supplied — forward fuselage sections 43/44, main landing gear wheel well, wing fixed trailing edge — for the 787 Dreamliner; no revenue share or dollar value disclosed.
Boeing's own 2001 press release announcing a firm contract for Aerosud to build airplane parts across Boeing's model range. Aerosud's site and trade press (Daily Investor, Business Focus Magazine) describe Aerosud later becoming sole supplier of interior composites/thermoplastic frames for 737 and 777 freighter programs, but neither party discloses volume or share of Aerosud revenue. Re-checked 2026-09-24 (wake-minerals-buyers, step 0.5): Boeing press release still says what the row claims (firm contract, Boeing supplies tooling/technology, no value disclosed); no newer primary source found, so the period stays 2001-vintage.
ATI press release: extended/expanded long-term titanium supply agreement covering Boeing's full commercial airplane program suite (narrowbody and widebody) plus third-party subsidiaries -- ingots, billets, rectangles, bars, plate, sheet and coil, including titanium alloy sheet from ATI's Pageland, SC plant. No dollar value, volume, or share of ATI's or Boeing's business disclosed.
AMETEK Metals own aerospace-materials page states: We are approved suppliers for OEMs including: Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier, Embraer, GE Aviation, Liebherr, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Rolls-Royce, SNECMA-SAFRAN and UTC. Boeing picked as the anchor name; this is a standing approved-supplier relationship, not a dated contract, and AMETEKs 10-K states no single customer exceeds 5% of consolidated net sales — no share-of-revenue figure exists to attach.
Multi-year contract announced 2022 to supply titanium forgings for Boeing 777X wing/structural components; a companion 2022 contract covers titanium forgings for 737/737 MAX wing components. No share-of-revenue figure disclosed. Refresh r19 2026-09-27: forgings are titanium, not aluminium; material pinned to titanium. Refresh 2026-09-29: titanium forgings are components, not raw-titanium trade, and the source names no delivery plant, so flow is left with destination unstated.
Norsk Titanium's own customer list (norsktitanium.com/company) and independent trade press (metal-am.com) confirm 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V structural parts delivered for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner via Tier-1 partners Spirit AeroSystems and Leonardo.
Subassembly/manufacturing subcontract work for Boeing 737 and 757 programmes.
Scope. This section is inverted evidence: each linked dossier wrote the original row about itself, describing its own relationship to this company. It is never a claim this company itself disclosed. Absence here is not evidence of no relationship — most of the corpus has no named-counterparty block at all yet.
Every exposure is read as a buyer dependency; the top 3 are its binding chokepoints.
As a buyer, policy pressure across its consumed materials is rising.
Descriptive trend in official policy actions on this company’s materials — a policy-pressure trend, not a price or trading signal. No forward probability is implied. Direction is measured on actions we have discovered, and discovery lags events: where the recent window is too thin to support a calm reading, the row says coverage-limited instead of easing.
No actions in the register have named or swept this company in the last 24 months.