Loading…
Loading…
5 critical materials scored · binding chokepoint: Cobalt (🇨🇳 CN 78% of refining) · 111 restrictive government measures on record
Vale S.A. produces 5 of the 5 scored materials above (Cobalt, Neodymium, Manganese, Copper, Nickel). For those, a supply restriction by the controlling country is a tailwind, not a headwind — the exposure is to disruption of a market this company supplies, not to a chokepoint it depends on. Every scored material here sits on its output side, so the High · 72/100 band should be read as chokepoint salience, not as buyer vulnerability, and the Art. 24 input-side duties below are qualified accordingly.
Role from an explicit dossier role: tag or the producer-sector classifier behind the /minerals alternatives bench (one classifier on disk, generated 2026-10-06) — the same source the company page uses. A material the classifier has no entry for defaults to a buyer dependency, which can understate a producer's output side. Descriptive classification only: it enters no score.
The binding exposure is Cobalt — 🇨🇳 CN controls 78% of global refining. On this company's production footprint that scores 75/100 (adversarial chokepoint; global 62). The register holds 111 restrictive government measures touching this company's materials — each traced to its primary source below.
Peer rank · Cobalt Vale S.A. is the 219th-most-exposed of the 586 named companies we track on 🇨🇳 CN's Cobalt chokepoint; the most-exposed is Less Common Metals (75/100). Ranked on the same footprint-adjusted buyer score as above — a relative read of an existing metric, not a new one.
Vale S.A. ranks 1st of 2 verified diversified mining companies.
Same sector_primary, ranked on the company supply-risk index. Restricted to hand-verified dossiers. A peer scoring lower is the useful read: it usually means a different production geography or a qualified second source.
Company supply-risk index 72/100 — the binding chokepoint dominates, with a modest add for exposure breadth across 5 scored materials. Buyer-relative (first-order): weighted by where the company produces (BR 78% · CA 12% · ID 7% · OM 3%, estimated split — no cited source states these exact shares), applied across all materials — it does not yet trace each input to its specific sourcing step.
Also listed in the dossier but not platform-scored: Iron-ore, Iron-ore-pellets — no supply-risk series is tracked for these here.
Disclosed production sites
Named plants and what they make, from the company's disclosures. Descriptive detail — the buyer score above is still driven by country-level footprint weights, not per-site material intensity.
Vale is the South American diversified-mining major and the largest single publicly-listed iron-ore producer in the world (~315 Mtpa from the Carajás Pará and Sistema Sul/Sudeste systems, including the flagship S11D mine). Three structurally distinct profit pools: (1) iron solutions — Carajás S11D + Itabira/Vargem Grande/Fábrica beneficiation + Tubarão / Ponta da Madeira / Guaíba terminals + a globally unique pelletising-plant complex (Tubarão I-VIII) selling premium high-grade fines and pellets to JFE, Posco, ArcelorMittal, Cleveland-Cliffs, Steel Dynamics and (China-side) Baowu, Shougang, Ansteel — the only seaborne supplier with Carajás 65%-Fe direct-feed for blast-furnace decarbonisation; (2) base metals (Vale Base Metals, "VBME") — Sudbury Ontario + Voisey's Bay Newfoundland + Long Harbour refinery (Class-1 nickel/cobalt sulphate, IRA-§30D-eligible chain), Onça Puma + Sorowako (Indonesia, 33.9% PT Vale Indonesia post- 2024 dilution) saprolite-NPI and the Pomalaa HPAL project (replacing Ford with Huayou Cobalt as JV partner, 2024), Salobo + Sossego + Salobo III copper concentrate (Pará); (3) freight & logistics — Estrada de Ferro Carajás (892 km) + Estrada de Ferro Vitória-Minas (905 km) + a captive Capesize/Valemax fleet (the structural cost-floor under any seaborne freight cycle). Roughly USD 40-45bn revenue; NYSE-listed ADR (VALE) and B3-listed ordinary (VALE3); no controlling shareholder post-2020 de-corporatisation, board-elected management under the Novo Mercado listing standard.
Vale sits inside the policy-instrument matrix at three simultaneous and structurally distinct positions: (1) Brazil's first standalone critical-minerals + reciprocity stack (Lei 15.122/2025 + PNMCE PL 2780/2024 + Portaria MME 120/2025 debentures + PlanGEO 2026-2035) — Vale is the unique-in-class integrated processor positioned to operationalise the entire downstream-incentive structure; (2) the US-Brazil bilateral post-EO-14323 regime — Vale was the largest single non-energy Brazilian exporter caught inside the IEEPA 50% tariff envelope (Aug 2025 → Feb 2026, eight months) and the structural beneficiary of Section 232 copper Proclamation 10962's cathode/concentrate exemption; (3) VBME's Indonesia position — the only single asset in the system simultaneously subject to Indonesia's PP 19/2025 royalty + PP 28/2025 smelter moratorium + Permen ESDM 17/2025 RKAB quota + IRA §30D FEoC restriction. Cross-axis: the China State Council Two-New equipment-renewal stimulus + MOFCOM steel-export licensing form a coupled bull/bear pair for Vale's iron-ore demand floor that operates orthogonally to the Western policy stack.
| Material | Vale segment | Active policy regimes |
|---|---|---|
| Iron ore (fines + pellets) | Iron Solutions — Carajás, Sistema Sul, Tubarão pellets | US EO 14323 (terminated Feb 2026); CN State Council Two-New stimulus; CN MOFCOM Announcement 79 steel-export licensing; GN Simandou JV conventions (competitive supply); BR Lei 15.122 reciprocity (defensive) |
| Copper concentrate | Salobo + Sossego + Salobo III (Pará) | US §232 Proclamation 10962 (concentrate exempt; derivatives at 50%); US Proclamation 11021 (50% full customs value); CN MOFCOM heavy-rare-earths April 2025 + October 2025 extraterritorial (counterparty risk for refined-cobalt offtake) |
| Class-1 nickel + cobalt sulphate | VBME — Sudbury / Voisey's Bay / Long Harbour | US IRA §30D FEoC rules; US-Brazil bilateral (no direct action); CA Critical Minerals Strategy 2022 |
| Indonesia nickel intermediates | PT Vale Indonesia (33.9%) — Sorowako + Pomalaa | ID PP 19/2025 royalty; ID PP 28/2025 OSS moratorium intermediate-nickel; ID Permen ESDM 17/2025 RKAB; ID Permendag 12/2026 export-policy fifth amendment; ID Keppres 1/2025 hilirisasi task force; ID UU 2/2025 Minerba fourth amendment |
| Rare earths / niobium prospect | Carajás minerals province + Araxá-Catalão proximate | BR PlanGEO 2026-2035 priority research area; BR PL 2780 PNMCE; BR Portaria MME 120/2025 debentures (REE downstream eligible); CN MOFCOM REE extraterritorial 2025-10-09 |
| Manganese | Azul mine (Pará) + Urucum (Mato Grosso do Sul) | US §232 steel/aluminium derivative tier (ferromanganese); BR PlanGEO 2026-2035 manganese priority |
The IPTM register contains 20 actions directly relevant to Vale's portfolio, spanning 5 issuer jurisdictions (US, BR, CN, ID, GN) and the bilateral US-Brazil + India-Brazil + US-Argentina vectors.
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| EO 14323 IEEPA Brazil tariff (50% cumulative) | tariff | 5 | Iron ore was NOT in initial Annex I exemptions; not added in the 13 Nov 2025 modifying EO either. The full 50% cumulative rate applied to Carajás fines and Tubarão pellets shipped to US Gulf/East-coast steel mills (Cliffs Tubarão pellet feed, Severstal Columbus, Nucor) from 6 Aug 2025 until SCOTUS termination 24 Feb 2026. Eight-month window. Vale is named in company_refs:. |
| §232 copper Proclamation 10962 | tariff | 4 | 50% on copper articles + derivatives; cathode + concentrate + anode + scrap exempt. Salobo + Sossego export US-bound concentrate (Asarco/Freeport intake). Net positive — derivative-tier 50% creates demand-side pull for Vale's input concentrate at the US smelter gate. |
| Proclamation 11021 (strengthening §232 Al/St/Cu) | tariff | 5 | Confirms 50% on full customs value (eliminates copper-content carve-out). Concentrate exemption preserved. Reinforces Vale's structural advantage as non-China-origin US-facing concentrate supplier. |
| §301 Brazil investigation | trade-remedy | 3 | USTR §301 over PIX, ethanol, Mercosur deforestation, IP — non-tariff but provides the trade-policy umbrella for any post-IEEPA-SCOTUS replacement tariff regime. |
| US-Argentina reciprocal trade & investment agreement | trade-agreement | 3 | Sets the template for Brazil's prospective US bilateral; Vale-Argentina exposure is currently minimal (no active mine; greenfield-only) but the framework is the negotiating reference. |
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lei 15.122/2025 Economic Reciprocity Law | trade-remedy | 4 | Brazil's first statutory retaliation framework; Decreto 12.551 of 14 Jul 2025 stood up CINCEC machinery 16 days before EO 14323. Vale named in consultative pool. Defensive — the credibility-of-retaliation premium is institutionally embedded before EO 14323 fires. |
| Nova Indústria Brasil (NIB) 2024 | industrial-policy | 3 | Parent statute under which Mover programme, Brasil Semicon, low-carbon hydrogen, and the strategic-minerals debentures sit. Vale qualifies for NIB credits across iron-ore-decarbonisation (green pellets), Class-1 nickel transformation, and copper-foil downstream. |
| Mover programme Lei 14.902/2024 | industrial-policy | 3 | BRL 19.3bn auto-decarbonisation credit envelope through 2029. Downstream beneficiary of Vale Class-1 nickel + Salobo copper foil for Brazilian-assembled EVs (Stellantis Goiana, BYD Camaçari, GWM Iracemápolis). |
| PlanGEO 2026-2035 | industrial-policy | 3 | 145 priority research areas, 10 commodities (REE/Li/Cu/Ni/Mn/graphite/Sn/Au/P/K). Heavy overlap with Vale's existing Carajás + Sistema Sul-Sudeste exploration footprint. Asymmetric advantage to incumbent footprint. |
| Portaria MME 120/2025 strategic-minerals debentures | industrial-policy | 3 | R$5.2 bn/year unlocked private capital via Lei 12.431 incentivised + Lei 14.801 infrastructure debentures. Vale-relevant downstream products enumerated: nickel sulphate, cobalt sulphate, copper foil, REE oxides. Vale is named in company_refs:. |
| PL 2780/2024 PNMCE | industrial-policy | 3 | R$5bn FGAM fund + 20% processing tax credit + 0.3% gross-revenue R&D levy + CMCE prior-approval rights over takeovers of mineral-rights holders. Vale is named in company_refs:. Chamber-approved 6 May 2026; pending Senate then presidential sanction. |
| Brasil Semicon programme | industrial-policy | 3 | Indirect — Vale's copper foil + Niobium-oxide line are upstream of any Brazilian semiconductor-substrate ambition. |
| Lei 14.948/2024 low-carbon hydrogen framework | industrial-policy | 3 | Pellet-plant decarbonisation pathway — Tubarão I-VIII is Brazil's largest single industrial-hydrogen consumer when DRI conversion happens. |
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keppres 1/2025 hilirisasi task force | industrial-policy | 4 | Cross-ministry coordination giving the nickel-policy stack a presidential-level enforcement spine. |
| PP 19/2025 tiered Minerba royalty | tax | 4 | Tiered royalty 14-19% (vs prior 10%) on nickel ore; PT Vale Indonesia's Sorowako saprolite stream takes the full incidence. |
| PP 28/2025 risk-based licensing + smelter moratorium | industrial-policy | 4 | OSS-platform moratorium on new intermediate-nickel lines (matte/MHP/NPI/FeNi) — forecloses Pomalaa HPAL's MHP-output route and forces escalation directly to Class-1 sulphate chemistry. |
| UU 2/2025 fourth-amendment Minerba | industrial-policy | 4 | Statutory layer entrenching the hilirisasi architecture as primary statute (requires National Assembly action to reverse). |
| Permen ESDM 17/2025 RKAB annual quota | industrial-policy | 4 | ~33% RKAB quota cut for 2026; PT Vale Indonesia ore-supply tightens at exactly Pomalaa first-fill. |
| Permendag 12/2026 export-policy fifth amendment | trade-remedy | 3 | Fifth amendment to Permendag 23/2023 export-licensing regime; tightens unprocessed-ore export reporting. |
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Council Two-New equipment-renewal stimulus | subsidy | 3 | Construction-equipment + building-renovation cycle = the floor under Chinese rebar/HRC demand = floor under Carajás iron-ore demand. The Two-New extension/expiry is the Vale macro hinge. |
| MOFCOM Announcement 79 steel-export licensing | export-control | 3 | Constrains Chinese steel exports → keeps domestic mills running → protects Pilbara/Carajás iron-ore demand. Counter-intuitively bullish for seaborne iron-ore. |
| MOFCOM REE extraterritorial controls 2025-10-09 | export-control | 5 | Indirect — Vale's REE prospect at Carajás (light REE laterite + by-product) gains structural value as supply-architecture diversification under PL 2780 PNMCE. Cited as a responds_to antecedent for PL 2780. |
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simandou iron-ore JV conventions | industrial-policy | 4 | Direct competitive supply — Simandou's 65%-Fe Blocks 1-2 (WCS consortium) + Blocks 3-4 (Rio-Chinalco) ramping 2026-2028 creates the only structural seaborne challenge to Carajás 65%-Fe premium grade. Vale's competitive moat (the only Carajás-grade premium-fines supplier) compresses as Simandou ramps. |
| Action | Type | Sev | Why it touches Vale |
|---|---|---|---|
| India-Brazil critical minerals MOU | trade-agreement | 3 | Direct vehicle for Vale to convert nascent Indian steel-mill demand (Tata, JSW, SAIL) into long-term contractual offtake; PNMCE-eligible processing capex can be co-financed under the MOU. |
Chamber-approved 6 May 2026; the mining lobby (AMC) is pushing the Federal Senate to strip the CMCE's veto power over takeovers. Watch for whether the Senate retains the CMCE-veto provision (sovereign- protection layer for Vale) or strips it (re-exposes Vale to opportunistic takeover during commodity-price troughs). Outcome materially repositions Vale's strategic-acquisition risk.
phased-tariff schedule (15% from 1 Jan 2027, 30% from 1 Jan 2028) on refined copper is contingent on this review. Salobo III sanctioning is contingent on the Commerce-review outcome and refined-cathode demand signal at US smelter-refineries.
since 2023; the Pomalaa-Ford-to-Huayou pivot (2024) already triggers IRA §30D FEoC-taint on the Indonesia Class-1 pathway. Carve-out valuation is highly sensitive to whether VBME pivots its Class-1 ambitions to a non-Indonesian asset (Voisey's Bay expansion, Long Harbour refinery debottleneck, or a new Canadian/Quebec greenfield).
national-emergency declaration under EO 14323 remains in effect even after the IEEPA tariff terminated on 24 Feb 2026; a §122 / §301 / §201 replacement vehicle is the open USTR option. Lei 15.122 / CINCEC retains the retaliation infrastructure.
programme was rolled forward through 2025; 2026 extension is the binding macro variable on Chinese iron-ore demand at the Pilbara cost curve.
decision converted VBME's Indonesia footprint from an IRA §30D-eligible Class-1 sourcing chain into a structurally FEoC-tainted asset under Treasury rules. Either (a) the carve-out IPO surfaces a Class-1 strategy pivot to Sudbury / Voisey's Bay / Long Harbour (Western IRA-eligible chain) — equity value upside on §30D + Mover + CMPTI eligibility — or (b) Vale retains VBME inside the parent and accepts the parent-level IRA §30D discount on Indonesia output, with Pomalaa surplus rerouted to Chinese precursor demand.
cleanest single-asset upside under §232 / Prc. 11021 / Mover programme copper-foil eligibility, contingent on the 30 Jun 2026 Commerce refined-copper review.
pellet plant + Lei 14.948 low-carbon hydrogen framework + Mover-programme green-steel incentives uniquely position Vale as the seaborne blast-furnace-DRI substitution partner. The CBAM definitive-phase iron-ore-pellet pricing (post-2026 import-charge incidence) is the pricing-translation event.
Carajás-province exploration footprint + the Onça Puma nickel sulphate + Salobo copper-foil downstream make Vale the asymmetric incumbent beneficiary of Brazil's domestic strategic-minerals financing stack — the only firm with the integrated permitting + offtake + transformation capacity to operationalise debenture-financed projects within bond tenors. Greenfield entrants do not have the optionality stack to capture the same incentive density.
1. EO 14323's iron-ore exposure was never in Annex I and the 13 Nov 2025 modifying EO didn't add it either. US steel-industry analysis reads the IEEPA-tariff regime as "softened" after the November exemption pass, but the agriculture-only exemption pattern left Vale's iron-ore + pellet exports under the full 50% cumulative rate for the entire 8-month window (Aug 2025 → Feb 2026). Sell-side that modelled iron ore as "structurally exempt by lobbying pressure" missed the timing — the SCOTUS termination, not lobbying, was what cleared the regime. The structural read forward: under any §122 / §301 / §201 replacement vehicle, Brazilian iron-ore + pellet is a candidate target line again because the agriculture-services-aircraft-energy coalition that won November exemptions has no industrial-metals constituency. Vale's hedge against a replacement-vehicle re-strike is the Cliffs / Steel Dynamics / Nucor pellet-feed dependency, NOT a political-economy exemption pathway.
2. Lei 15.122/2025 was institutionally engineered to be operational 16 days before EO 14323 fired. Brazil's Economic Reciprocity Law was sanctioned 11 Apr 2025; the implementing Decreto 12.551 + CINCEC machinery was stood up 14 Jul 2025; EO 14323 was signed 30 Jul 2025. The credibility-of-retaliation premium was therefore baked in before the US action — Lula could have invoked CINCEC fast-track countermeasures on Day 1 against US imports. He chose not to (the conciliatory stance that produced the Trump-Lula 6 Oct 2025 bilateral). The strategic disclosure is in the non-invocation — the same pattern Eramet's non-invocation of ICSID revealed in the Indonesia / Gabon context. The structural read for Vale: Brazil's restraint was a strategic disclosure that the bilateral trade relationship is too valuable to its iron-ore + agricultural-exporter coalition to escalate first, which materially increases the probability of a §122 / §301 replacement tariff regime because the US side anticipates limited retaliation.
3. VBME's Class-1 nickel sulphate IRA §30D pathway is FEoC-tainted bilaterally — and equity research is modelling only the Pomalaa-Huayou side. Treasury §30D FEoC rules disqualify any Chinese-affiliated Class-1 nickel from the consumer-EV tax-credit chain. The Ford → Huayou Cobalt JV pivot at Pomalaa (2024) created the FEoC taint on Pomalaa directly. But the structurally more important issue is the Sorowako matte pathway: PT Vale Indonesia's Sorowako matte is converted at Sumitomo's Niihama (JP) — a Japanese non-FEoC route — into Class-1 sulphate. The PP 28/2025 OSS moratorium on intermediate-nickel lines forecloses Pomalaa MHP production but DOES NOT touch Sorowako matte; the Permen ESDM 17/2025 RKAB quota DOES tighten Sorowako saprolite ore supply. The non-obvious is that Sumitomo's Niihama-routed Sorowako matte → Class-1 sulphate is a structurally rare IRA-§30D- eligible Asian Class-1 sourcing chain that the equity-research FEoC-discount on VBME ignores. Material to the VBME carve-out valuation.
4. Carajás 65%-Fe premium-grade fines + Tubarão pellets + Mover programme green-steel + CBAM definitive phase form a uniquely convergent four-policy stack that nobody else in the seaborne iron-ore market can replicate. Carajás 65%-Fe is the only seaborne supply that meets the gangue-content threshold for direct-feed blast-furnace decarbonisation (without sintering); Tubarão's eight pellet plants are the only such complex on the seaborne side; Lei 14.948 + Mover programme provide the Brazilian-domestic green-steel incentive layer; CBAM definitive phase (2026-01-01 onward) prices premium-fines decarbonisation benefit into EU steel-mill paying prices. The four converge to a structural premium-fines pricing pivot that even Simandou (Rio-Chinalco Blocks 3-4 + WCS Blocks 1-2) cannot match because Simandou lacks the integrated pellet-plant complex. Equity research models iron-ore as a single benchmark (62%-Fe Platts) plus a premium-fines differential — the structural read is that the differential is widening as CBAM-induced demand for premium-fines decarbonisation outpaces low-CO2 supply growth.
5. PNMCE CMCE veto over takeovers is a sovereign-protection layer the equity-research narrative treats as a constraint. PL 2780/2024 PNMCE establishes the Comitê de Minerais Críticos e Estratégicos with prior-approval rights over takeovers, foreign-acquired participation, and access to strategic geological information involving mineral-rights holders. The mining lobby (AMC) is openly campaigning in the Senate to strip the veto. Sell-side reads CMCE as a constraint on management M&A flexibility; the structural read is sovereign insulation. Vale has no controlling shareholder post-2020 de-corporatisation, so during a commodity-price trough a Saudi/Chinese/Glencore consortium could in principle accumulate a control block — CMCE veto closes that path. The structural-protection value of CMCE to Vale's existing shareholders is non-trivially priced into PNMCE outcome scenarios. Watch the Senate disposition closely: if CMCE veto is retained, Vale takeover-defence framework is sovereign-anchored; if stripped, Vale re-enters the M&A perimeter.
VBME carve-out scope + Class-1 strategy pivot. Vale has signalled a VBME carve-out IPO since 2023. The Pomalaa-Ford-to-Huayou pivot in 2024 already FEoC-tainted the Indonesia Class-1 pathway under Treasury §30D rules. The carve-out IPO valuation rests on whether management commits to a non-Indonesian Class-1 strategy (Voisey's Bay expansion + Long Harbour refinery debottleneck + a Quebec/Canada greenfield aligned to the US-Norway Critical Minerals MOU and the Canadian Build-Partner-Buy defence-industrial framework), or accepts a structurally lower carve-out multiple by carrying the Indonesia FEoC-taint forward. The decision window is Q3-Q4 2026 (post-Senate disposition of PL 2780 + post-§232 refined-copper Commerce review + Indonesia Permendag 12/2026 export- policy fifth-amendment implementation pass). The Sumitomo Niihama-routed Sorowako matte → Class-1 sulphate non-FEoC pathway is the structural asymmetry that makes the decision asymmetric in favour of carve-out at a higher-than-headline-FEoC-discount multiple.
Vale is structurally the policy-instrument-diverse South American analogue of Rio Tinto but with a distinctive Brazil-sovereign anchor (PNMCE / Lei 15.122 / Portaria MME 120 / PlanGEO) that no other diversified-mining major carries. Cross-axis:
copper-concentrate anode-slime byproduct stream (parallel to Aurubis Hamburg + Rio Kennecott + Glencore Horne; Vale's anode-slime recovery is under-disclosed in segmental reporting). MOFCOM REE extraterritorial 2025-10-09 is cited as a responds_to antecedent for PL 2780 PNMCE.
Vale Indonesia (Sorowako + Pomalaa); paired comparator with Eramet's Weda Bay (also FEoC-tainted via Tsingshan). Vale's distinctive read: Sumitomo Niihama matte route is the structural non-FEoC asymmetry Eramet's Weda Bay lacks.
premium-fines + Tubarão pellets CBAM-translation pricing.
foil (Mover programme + IRA EV-incentive linkage to Stellantis Goiana + BYD Camaçari + GWM Iracemápolis assembly lines).
no Russia exposure post-2022).
Vale sits in 6 distinct policy axes simultaneously, joint-densest with Rio Tinto in the existing dossier corpus, and uniquely covers the Brazil-sovereign critical-minerals stack vertex that no other dossier touches.
Refresh quarterly; trigger events for re-write: (a) Senate disposition of PL 2780/2024 PNMCE (CMCE-veto retention or stripping); (b) §232 Commerce refined-copper review (30 June 2026); (c) §122 / §301 / §201 US-Brazil replacement vehicle for post-SCOTUS-terminated EO 14323; (d) VBME carve-out IPO filing or formal abandonment; (e) Indonesia Permen ESDM 17/2025 RKAB quota Q1 2026 allocation; (f) Two-New 2026 extension or sunset.
sources: block: White House, Federal Register, Planalto, Câmara dos Deputados, MME, Indonesian Presidential / ministerial gazettes, PRC State Council and MOFCOM, Guinean conventions registry).
statements (B3 + SEC F-20).
technical-update disclosures.
Rossi Watanabe legal commentary on PL 2780 / Lei 15.122 / Portaria MME 120 / Decreto 12.551. Baker McKenzie + Covington & Burling on EO 14323 / Brazilian response. CRS IN12614 on §232 copper. Thompson Coburn + HSF Kramer Brazil tariff tracker.
From the company’s own filings and dated disclosures — top-5 concentration and related-party tables where the filer’s regime compels them, named supply and offtake agreements where it does not. This is a disclosure, not a netting: a named supplier concentration is shown beside the exposure score and never adjusts it. Figures are the fiscal years labelled, not a current snapshot.
Recorded as customer because the Huali/Pomalaa HPAL joint ventures process PT Vale Indonesia's Sorowako/Pomalaa nickel ore into MHP that Huayou further refines into nickel/cobalt sulphate and PCAM for EV batteries (Huayou is simultaneously JV equity partner and HPAL-technology provider, not a pure offtaker). Per Vale's 25-Aug-2023 press release: Definitive Cooperation Agreement targeting 60,000t nickel + ~5,000t cobalt/year in MHP from the Sorowako block (Huali project); parallel Pomalaa HPAL facility (with Ford Motor Co. as third equity partner) targets ~120,000t/yr contained nickel. No per-tonne offtake price or volume split disclosed in this release.
Wheaton's 2025 AIF (Exhibit 99.1 to its 40-F, dated 2026-02-19; direct exhibit URL returns 403 to automated fetches, replaced here with the live EDGAR filing index): a 2018-06-11 precious metal purchase agreement to acquire from Vale Switzerland S.A. (a Vale subsidiary) 42.4% of cobalt production from the Voisey's Bay mine (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada) until delivery of 31 million pounds, then 21.2% thereafter. Wheaton buys a fixed share of Vale's Voisey's Bay cobalt at a discount, delivered in refined metal — the streaming-company equivalent of a customer. Stream commodity is cobalt (one of this dossier's scored materials); does not apply to Vale's iron-ore/nickel/copper/manganese/rare-earths lines.
Alternative track — a counterparty read from primary filings, never merged into the exposure score. Absence of a name is not absence of a relationship: Filers name only the counterparties their regime compels them to name, and several of this company’s largest are disclosed by size with no name at all.
Ranked by buyer-relative risk, highest first.
3 of 5 of your scored CRMA-strategic materials breach the EU’s own Art. 5 65% single-third-country ceiling (global-production proxy).
| Material | Controlled by | You | Global | Band | Art. 5 | Input share | Substitute | Laws | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalt | 🇨🇳 CN 78% refining | 75 | 62 | High | EXCEEDS 78% | Low | some | 37 | ▲ rising |
| Neodymium | 🇨🇳 CN 85% refining | 74 | 72 | High | EXCEEDS 85% | — | some | 50 | ▲ rising |
| Manganese | 🇨🇳 CN 90% refining | 71 | 69 | High | EXCEEDS 90% | Low | none | 12 | ▲ rising |
| Copper | 🇨🇳 CN 48% refining | 60 | 59 | Elevated | within 48% | Med | limited | 52 | ▲ rising |
| Nickel | 🇨🇳 CN 36% refining | 56 | 55 | Elevated | within 36% | High | limited | 29 | ▲ rising |
You = buyer-relative score (this company's disclosed footprint vs. the controller). Global = buyer-agnostic supply risk. Substitute = ease of swapping the material out (none = locked in). Input share = the material's disclosed magnitude in the company's input basket (HIGH/MED/LOW only where a public filing quantifies it; — = unrated). Descriptive effect-size, never scored.
Art. 5 = does the global top single-country share breach the EU's own CRMA Art. 5 diversification ceiling (no more than 65% of a strategic raw material from a single third country)? A conservative global-production PROXY for the EU-import denominator — descriptive only, sits beside the score, never merged into it (— = non-strategic material). Reg. (EU) 2024/1252 Art. 5 ↗
Per-material factor scoring on a 1–5 likelihood×impact scale, mapped to the Art. 24(2)(b) risk-factor framework. The headline score above is a portfolio RAG; this matrix is the assessment — it is where two companies with the same binding chokepoint diverge.
| Material | Geopolitical | Concentration | Price / market | Substitutability | Import reliance | Logistics · ESG · Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalt | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | company input |
| Neodymium | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | company input |
| Manganese | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | company input |
| Copper | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | company input |
| Nickel | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | company input |
1 = very low … 5 = very high — a standard supply-risk likelihood×impact scale (the form a competent authority expects for the Art. 24(2)(b) factor analysis, not a CRMA-numbered scale). Public-source factors are pre-filled from the engine's primary sources (USGS concentration, IPTM government actions, EU import data); the three rightmost factor categories need company / Tier-1 supplier data and are flagged as input under Art. 24(3). Hover any cell for its evidence.
Every new filing and every amendment (rate change, scope change, repeal) touching this company's materials in the window above. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date.
Restrictive government measures on this company's materials, newest first — each links to its primary government source.
+ 96 more in the register.
The Art. 24(2)(c) vulnerability assessment, made explicit. For each leading exposure we model the move in this company's buyer-relative score under two distinct supply-disruption scenarios — the production footprint held fixed, only one lever moved at a time so each delta isolates one shock:
Under the 🇨🇳 CN shock, these disclosed plants carry the binding Cobalt exposure:
Counterfactual: Indonesia extends the hilirisasi ore-ban template (2020 nickel → 2023 bauxite) to the next rung of battery-mineral exports — tightening upstream supply for cobalt intermediates, lithium feedstock and graphite alongside the existing nickel + aluminium regime. Direct-hit lines are basket issuers whose binding material is a battery-cell input (nickel, cobalt, lithium, graphite) — irrespective of controller, since the template-export is global supply-chain pressure not bilateral targeting.
The binding exposure this precedent lands on — Cobalt — is a material Vale S.A. produces, so this is an output-market event for this company, not a supply vulnerability. No modelled stressed delta is shown: the buyer-relative stress models a rising cost of an input, which is the wrong direction for a supplier of the material, and we would rather show no number than a wrong-signed one. It is never netted against the consumer-side levers in §6.4 — those are reported separately.
role: tag or the producer-sector classifier (one classifier on disk, generated 2026-10-06) — for this company the basis is a disclosed dossier tag. It enters no score.🇨🇳 CN has issued 2 restrictive actions on Cobalt since 2016, severity flat (5.0 → 3.0).A descriptive trajectory of past official actions — not a forecast.
You hold exposure to 3 of these 27 materials (Cobalt, Copper, Neodymium) — your binding Cobalt exposure is one of them.
Demonstrated cadence: 🇨🇳 CN has widened its restricted-material list a median of 5.9 months apart across 7 distinct restriction dates since 2016 (n=6 intervals).
Response coupling: when 🇨🇳 CN restricts, our causal register records these counter-moves —
Second-order exposure cascade: the retaliation to one chokepoint has historically landed on another material you depend on —
| Type | Scenario | Today | Stressed | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy | Cobalt — 🇨🇳 CN escalates cobalt controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime | 75 | 81 | +6 |
| Concentration | Cobalt — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for cobalt — the second source is lost (full 78%+ monopoly) | 75 | 89 | +14 |
| Policy | Neodymium — 🇨🇳 CN escalates neodymium controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime | 74 | 78 | +4 |
| Concentration | Neodymium — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for neodymium — the second source is lost (full 85%+ monopoly) | 74 | 84 | +10 |
| Policy | Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN escalates manganese controls to a full export-licensing / ban regime | 71 | 77 | +6 |
| Concentration | Manganese — 🇨🇳 CN becomes the single source for manganese — the second source is lost (full 90%+ monopoly) | 71 | 77 | +6 |
A zero delta means that lever is already modelled at maximum on that material — today's score already prices it in. This is why the two scenarios are shown together: where a material's policy lever is already maxed (zero policy delta), the concentration shock still carries a real delta, and vice-versa. Each stressed score isolates its one lever; all other factors are held at current values.
No material crosses the significant-vulnerability threshold on the input side — every scored material here is one Vale S.A. produces, and Art. 24 addresses the use of a strategic raw material as an input. The Art. 24(4) mitigation duty is not triggered on the public-source evidence; the mitigations below are precautionary.
Reported separately (not an Art. 24(4) trigger): Manganese clears the same numeric bar but is a material Vale S.A. produces. That is an output-market concentration — relevant to revenue and to counterparties who buy from this company — not an input dependency the company must mitigate under Art. 24(4).
Stated threshold (so the conclusion is reproducible and auditable): buyer-relative band ≥ High AND substitutability hard/none AND ≥ 1 in-force restrictive measure on the material, assessed over the 0 materials this company buys (the 5 it produces are excluded from the test and listed above). The CRMA does not fix a numeric definition of “significant”; the company may adopt a stricter or looser threshold and should record it here.
Proposed, announced or draft regulation that is not yet in force but would touch this company's at-risk materials if it passes. Forward-looking early-warning — the likelihood shown is an honest band derived from the legislative stage, not a forecast or a fabricated probability. Kept separate from the enacted register above: nothing here is law yet.
Bills at introduction (pre-committee) in US historically become law ~5% of the time (n=37,132, GovTrack — 117th–118th Congresses) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
Bills at out of committee in US historically become law ~21% of the time (n=1,687, GovTrack — 117th Congress (2021–2023)) — a base rate for comparable bills, not a forecast for this one. source ↗
Likelihood band is derived deterministically from the legislative stage (announced → low; draft-published / in-consultation → moderate; passed-committee → elevated; passed-vote / awaiting-signature → high) — a reproducible, source-traceable proxy, not a probability estimate. Where shown, the modelled impact-if-passed re-uses the same buyer-relative stress engine as the enacted scenarios above: it holds this company's production footprint fixed and escalates the proposed measure to a full export-licensing / control regime — the conservative upper bound for a measure that may pass only as a partial cap. The delta is the move from today's score to that stressed score; companies with no modelled production footprint show no delta.
Forward-looking read on the binding chokepoint, from the recent trajectory of policy on these materials. Directional, not a forecast.
Every scored material here is one Vale S.A. produces, so the Art. 24(4) buyer levers — qualify an alternative supplier, re-source, substitute the input — do not apply to this company. The output-side items below are what a concentrated producer's risk office actually acts on. We render them rather than a generic diversification list because a prescription addressed to the wrong side of the market is worse than none.
Under the EU Critical Raw Materials Act (Reg. (EU) 2024/1252), a Member State identifies the large companies (Art. 2(29): >500 employees and >€150M net worldwide turnover) using strategic raw materials to manufacture a listed strategic technology (batteries, renewables, hydrogen, traction motors, heat pumps, aircraft, data-storage equipment, robotics, drones, satellites, advanced chips). Those companies must, at least every three years and to the extent the information is available to them (Art. 24(2)), assess their strategic-raw-material supply chain. Where suppliers do not provide the data on request, the assessment may rely on the Commission's monitoring dashboard (Art. 20(4)) or other publicly available information (Art. 24(3)) — which is the evidence base this report assembles. Board reporting (Art. 24(5)) is voluntary unless the Member State mandates it (Art. 24(6)).
| CRMA provision | Obligation | Where addressed |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 24(1) | Member State identifies the company as in-scope (uses an SRM to make a listed strategic technology). | Scope & applicability |
| Art. 24(2)(a) | Map where the strategic raw materials are extracted, processed and recycled. | Exposure register + Supply-risk factor analysis |
| Art. 24(2)(b) | Analyse the factors that might affect supply. | Supply-risk factor analysis (factor matrix) + The laws that threaten it |
| Art. 24(2)(c) | Assess vulnerabilities to supply disruptions. | Stress test + significant-vulnerability conclusion |
| Art. 24(3) | Where supplier data is unavailable, rely on Commission (Art. 20(4)) / public sources. | This report's basis — see Methodology & sources |
| Art. 24(4) | Where significant vulnerabilities are found, assess diversifying or substituting. | Significant-vulnerability conclusion + Priority mitigations |
| Art. 24(5)–(6) | Report results, sources, significant risks and mitigations to the board. | This document — board-ready, PDF-exportable |
This report pre-fills the Art. 24(3) public-source half of the assessment. The company-specific inputs — employee/turnover thresholds, bill-of-materials volumes, the tiered supplier map, and formal board adoption — remain the company's to complete; they are flagged as “company input” where they appear.
Article 24 applies only when both size thresholds are met and a Member State has identified the company as making a listed strategic technology with strategic raw materials.
| Threshold test | This assessment |
|---|---|
| Average employees (last FY) > 500 | company input |
| Net worldwide turnover (last FY) > €150M | company input |
| Uses a strategic raw material as an input | company input — all 5 scored SRMs here are ones this company produces, not buys; input use is not evidenced by this assessment |
| Manufactures a listed strategic technology | diversified-mining (confirm against Annex) |
| Formally identified by a Member State authority | company input |
Production-concentration figures: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 + the production dataset behind each material page. Policy measures trace to the primary government sources below.
Each material's global supply-risk index blends five weighted factors: concentration of refining/processing (35%), active trade-control & policy pressure (25%), import reliance (15%), substitutability (15%), and price stress (10%). The buyer-relative score then scales the relational factors (concentration / policy / import) by this company's production-footprint alignment against each material's controlling country — bloc-neutral factors (substitutability, price) are left intact.
Caveats. The footprint is the company's assembly / manufacturing geography applied uniformly across all materials — a first-order proxy, not per-material input tracing. Scores are an analytical judgement on public data with a transparent weighting, not a market forecast or investment advice. Production shares reflect 2024-2025 figures and the policy position as of 2026-09-30; the register is continuously maintained and should be re-pulled against each new policy action.
MACROLENS · CICONIALABS · GEOPOLITICAL SUPPLY-RISK REPORT (EU CRMA ART. 20–25) · report generated 2026-10-06
Tip: the change log above defaults to the last 30 days. Append ?since=YYYY-MM-DD to this URL for a custom start date (e.g. ?since=2026-04-01).
This is a description of the actual automated pipeline (verifiable against this repo's own cron schedule), not a contractual commitment.